Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Spreading misinformation isn’t helpful.
Yes they had and have a test for Covid that works.


2 posted on 07/31/2021 2:45:59 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Leave me alone, I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HereInTheHeartland
Spreading misinformation isn’t helpful.

Yes they had and have a test for Covid that works.


  1. This isn't misinformation.
  2. Sure they did. <\EXTREME SARCASM>

6 posted on 07/31/2021 2:48:18 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

And your CDC information contradicts other’s CDC information? Who’s right? Who’s wrong? Who eventually suffers?


8 posted on 07/31/2021 2:49:05 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Identify As Vaccinated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

80 pages. Have at it and let us know your results.


9 posted on 07/31/2021 2:51:07 PM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

“The FDA document, available from the FDA.gov website, is entitled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel .” The document astonishingly admits:

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

Then the FDA supplied the misinformation...


10 posted on 07/31/2021 2:51:18 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

I know how you feel. I don’t believe anything coming from the CDC either.


13 posted on 07/31/2021 2:56:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who shot Ashli Babbitt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Impressive

A Free Republic Vaxxer Karen showed up on comment 2 on the thread. Well done!

14 posted on 07/31/2021 2:56:52 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (F*ck Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland
They don't have any test in the field that differentiates the Delta variant!!!

The PCR test being used employs a 35 to 40 X multiplier on the sample, while all multipliers past 30X render the results meaningless.

(FYI these are logarithmic scales, not simple multipliers, which is much worse)

18 posted on 07/31/2021 3:02:14 PM PDT by G Larry (Force the Universities to use their TAX FREE ENDOWMENTS to pay off Student loan debt!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

biden, fauxi, and the cdc recommending vaccines for our citizens to stop the spread of a virus while biden opens the border, invites, welcomes, and spreads thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a “global pandemic” reeks of hypocrisy and proves our government doesn’t care about our health and safety...


22 posted on 07/31/2021 3:06:45 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value as well as making people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Oh, Okie-dokie. /s

“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation."

33 posted on 07/31/2021 3:15:25 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

you think this document is a fake?


38 posted on 07/31/2021 3:18:49 PM PDT by Theophilus (Dems fear fear. Christians fear God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

..a test that works?..technically it functions but its results are diagnostically worthless... the CDC has just trashed the PCR test they have been using for 18 months...I’m sure they did that because it works.


41 posted on 07/31/2021 3:21:14 PM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

why should we trust the cdc?...


50 posted on 07/31/2021 3:38:20 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value as well as making people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Spreading misinformation isn’t helpful.

And we’re supposed to believe these same tests showed there was no Flu virus in the Fall / Winter of 2020.


54 posted on 07/31/2021 3:56:26 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

The guy who invented the test says it doesn’t work You are the one spreading misinformation


60 posted on 07/31/2021 4:05:40 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Define “works”.

Does working mean that the tests accurately identify the Covid-19 virus and excludes all others?

Or does working mean that the tests generate the statistical basis for imposing a tyrannical lockdown on the people, destroying businesses and the economy, and facilitating a scheme by which legally and constitutionally required safeguards are ignored allowing massive fraud in a presidential election?


69 posted on 07/31/2021 4:28:47 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Fake news, fake election, fake president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

BS

Liar


71 posted on 07/31/2021 4:29:55 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The Republican Party is DEAD! It took 160 years but The Whigs Struck Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

The Alberta government has said they don’t.

Realize you’ve been lied to over and over.


82 posted on 07/31/2021 5:30:07 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson