Posted on 07/30/2021 10:44:20 AM PDT by knighthawk
Twitter has come under fire for locking the account of conservative commentator Dave Rubin over a post where he said COVID-19 vaccines aren't working as promised, officials want a federal mandate and booster shots are in the works.
Rubin, whose new book is released today, tweeted Thursday evening that society should 'take a pause' amid the vaccine rollout.
'They want a federal vaccine mandate for vaccines which are clearly not working as promised just weeks ago,' he wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I agree with Rubin. Just wondering why the Democrats are pushing for the mandate. They are doing this insanity for a reason!
I agree with Rubin. Just wondering why the Democrats are pushing for the mandate. They are doing this insanity for a reason!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IMHO they are doing it to beat the truth emerging...race to get as many jabbed as possible before they lose control of the narrative when true facts break through the wall of censorship and people start realizing that what Rubin (as well as others) said is true.
Rubin isn’t even a “conservative” - he’s a “reluctantly pro-choice” moderate!
IMHO they are doing it to beat the truth emerging...race to get as many jabbed as possible before they lose control of the narrative when true facts break through the wall of censorship and people start realizing that what Rubin (as well as others) said is true.
Am I the only one who gets sidetracked by the sidebar at ukdailymail?
IMHO they are doing it to beat the truth emerging...race to get as many jabbed as possible before they lose control of the narrative when true facts break through the wall of censorship and people start realizing that what Rubin (as well as others) said is true.
—
This process is very much in keeping with Leftist “thinking” which inevitably inverts cause and effect and decouples observations with “wants”.
- If you corner a leftist on the failure of communism, they’ll always claim it just wasn’t done “right” or the whole world has to do it for it to work. Never mind that any working economic system will scale from person-to-person to entire civilizations.
- Leftists think printing money will magically create “wealth”, whereas money is only a representation of capital (good and services).
- Leftists think if you don’t make something a crime, the crime goes away. No, the reporting of it may go away, but the event still happens.
- Leftists, with the vaccine, wanted it to work. If shown contradicting evidence that the vaccine is failing or not operating as expected, instead double-down and demand more vaccinations. As if persisting in going in the wrong direction, because you “want” a particular outcome will make it happen.
They’ve got it set up just as if drivers were passing a train wreck.
Makes perfect sense.
Here’s the reason:
Start at 3:50 mark.
https://rumble.com/vk9rmy-episode-1120-dirty-dozen-the-12-most-dangerous-people-in-america-pt.-1.html
Listen closely when she mentions “deliverables”.
He's gay, used to be on the "Young Turks" until they kicked him out.
Good points.
They also seem to be setting up the unvaccinated as the scapegoats...
This is hillarious, Rubin even appeared on Louder With Crowder’s Parody of “The Young Turks”
“YOU BROKE MY HEART!!!!!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsVONO75utI
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/07/30/17/46100923-9844825-image-a-46_1627663200161.jpg
That’s what got me. Not gory by any means.
What he said is true. But it’s not truth that twatter is promoting. It’s the official party line.
what needs to happen is countries banning twitter and ilk for suppressing the truth-
Dave Rubin is NOT a Conservative! He is a realist.
I don’t use Twitter and neither should you.
DAs, cops, and judges will let crime run rampant. Guns will be blamed and guns will be banned.
The Revolutionary War was fought for less than what is happening now.
That's according to the only comprehensive sexual behavior study done in America called something like "The Sociology of Sexuality" and done for the NIH by Univ of Chicago. The researchers were surprised to learn that the people who had sex the most frequently were the ones who had these three characteristics: said they were Christian, married, said they attended church regularly. LOL The same for the people who stated being happiest with their sex life. LOL The same for the women who reported most frequently reaching the big O. LOL
When it comes to sex worldly people just talk, talk, talk up a game. Christians walk the walk. LOL
The jab of mRNA (synthesized strand of genetic material) is a package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful S-1 spike protein.
Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission. That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.
The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs as a vaccine.
Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device (a bio-weapon) in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.
No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug. The jab is not a living or biological system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.
Stated Objective
As to why the vaccine hype, the most important quote of this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a quote made in 2015 by Peter Daszak, head of Eco-Health Alliance and long-time collaborator with Dr. Fauci and NIAID on gain of function research.
In 2015, Duszak said,
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
See Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses.
It’s not hard to figure that SARS-CoV-2 was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And it’s the easiest thing to describe because they are the ones that said it. And the Occam’s Razor reality is they've said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit.
When I see a person wearing a ski mask, waving a gun, and standing with a bag of money in front of a bank; I will make the assumption that that person might be a bank robber.
Similarly, if I have somebody who says we need to use the media to hype a medical countermeasure which is in fact the injection of a synthetic, recombinant chimeric protein developed off of a computer simulation, I’m actually going to listen to the motivation for why that might be being done; I will listen to the person doing the manipulation who says investors will follow where they see profit.
You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrators.
Masks
Through April 2020, the official recommendation by the Journal of the American Medical Association was was unambiguous:
“Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”
Part of that lack of evidence in fact showed that cloth facemasks actually increased influenza-linked illness.
In contravention to established science, States, municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for the promulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergency stating a “belief” that face masks limit the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmed that a mask prevented the transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2. Simply stated, a "belief" is not a medical countermeasure.
All parties mandating the use of facemasks are not only willfully ignoring established science but are engaging in what amounts to a whole population clinical trial. This conclusion is reached by the fact that facemask use and COVID-19 incidence are being reported in scientific opinion pieces promoted by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others.
Social Distancing
Social distancing of up to 6 feet has been promoted as a means of preventing person-to-person transmission of influenza-like viruses. While one study (Werner E. Bischoff, Katrina Swett, Iris Leng, Timothy R. Peters, Exposure to Influenza Virus Aerosols During Routine Patient Care, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 207, Issue 7, 1 April 2013, Pages 1037-1046,) hypothesized that infection could happen in a 6 foot range, the study explicitly states that person-to-person transfer was not tested and viability of the virus at 6 feet was not even a subject of the investigation.
That did not stop the misrepresentation of the study to be used as the basis for an unverified medical counter measure of social distancing. To date, no study has established the efficacy of social distancing to modify the transmission of SARS CoV-2. Public health officials have merely referenced this article.
In contravention to established science, States, municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for the promulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergency stating a “belief” that social distancing of a healthy population limits the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmed that social distancing of any population prevented the transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2.
FTC Act
It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made. As a result, every party promoting the use of face masks is violating the FTC Act.
Further, under 21 CFR § 50.24 et seq., it is unlawful to conduct medical research (even in the case of emergency) without a series of steps taken to:
a. Establish the research with a duly authorized and independent institutional review board;
b. Secure informed consent of all participants including a statement of risks and benefits; and,
c. Engage in consultation with the community in which the study is to be conducted.
All of these laws have been broken. All relevant authorities in the United States must cease and desist the use of face masks until the matters above are rectified.
Establishment Clause
The Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Forcing someone to "believe" that a thing might work not based on facts but based on a belief alone is tantamount to a religion and is prohibited without limitation. Not even the Supreme Court's seminal decision on vaccines, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), alters this fact.
Reason and an ordered society demand the current wall of bravo sierra regarding SARS-CoV-2 be challenged and torn down down brick by brick.
Novel Variant
According the CDC,
To tell which variant might might be present in a specimen, scientists must perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) on that specimen. At this time, WGS is available for surveillance purposes only, not for individual diagnostic purposes.
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) described by CDC does not establish the genome sequence of the "delta variant" is novel from COVID-19.
There is no evidence that the delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else on GISAID. The fact that we are now looking for a thing/variant doesn’t mean that it is a thing/variant because we are looking at fragments of a strand of genetic material and the fact is that we can choose any fragment in the genome sequence and call it a thing/variant.
For example, I could come up with "omega variant" tomorrow and I could say I’m looking for this sub-strand of either DNA or mRNA, or even a protein, and I could run around the world saying “fear the omega variant.”
The problem is because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a compositing process – it’s what we can call in mathematics an interleaving – we don’t have any point of reference to actually to know whether or not the thing we’re looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even genomic sense.
And so we’re trapped in a world where unfortunately if you go and look at the papers that isolated the delta variant and actually asked the question is the delta variant anything other than a selection of a sequence in a systematic shift of an already disclosed other sequence, the answer is it’s just an alteration and when you start and stop what you call the reading frame. There is no evidence of any novel anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
