Posted on 07/29/2021 2:16:48 PM PDT by NoLibZone
New recommendations from federal health officials this week on when vaccinated Americans should don face masks came with a startling bolt of news: People who have had their shots and become infected with the delta variant of the coronavirus can harbor large amounts of virus just like unvaccinated people. That means they could become spreaders of the disease and should return to wearing masks indoors in certain situations, including when vulnerable people are present.
But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not publish the new research. In the text of the updated masking guidance, the agency merely cited “CDC COVID-19 Response Team, unpublished data, 2021.”
Some outside scientists have their own message: Show us the data.
“They’re making a claim that people with delta who are vaccinated and unvaccinated have similar levels of viral load, but nobody knows what that means,” said Gregg Gonsalves, an associate professor at the Yale School of Public Health. “It’s meaningless unless we see the data.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Well, Deagle was showing that the population of the USA would be reduced 80-90% IIRC by 2025, but of course why was never stated.
And now we know.
Well, Deagle was showing that the population of the USA would be reduced 80-90% IIRC by 2025, but of course why was never stated.
Indeed!
saintgermaine reminds us of this, often.
Good reminder.
Why would Deagel predict this? 🤔
Thx, to both, for your replies. Sounds like it’s natural immunity (the life long kind :)
Good point that their trust in science only goes so far. Then again, we all should not necessarily trust any science that is put out by something likely paid for by industry.
Funding should come with no strings attached.
Including government funding of things such as climate research only funding studies that are with the “consensus”
Why would Deagel predict this?
It appears that Deagle is privy to information that is kept from the general public. My personal hunch is that it is related to this crazy virus and the way the powers to be are more or less FORCING the public to address it with so called vaccines which in the foreseeable future may create more harm than good. Some of these adverse results are already showing up immediately while others predispose the humans having received these shots to adverse reactions in the future which amongst others may lead to an early demise.
. The sad part is that there are other fairly simple treatments as well as prophylactic’s available to counteract this virus without any of these adverse side effects. But like a conspiracy the powers to be have decided to suppress, prohibit and censure any information which maybe useful to the public to fight this virus. For example like Dr. Zalenkov’s regime, HCQ and ivermectin amongst several others as well as the encouragement to improve ones resistance by supplementation with certain nutrients and vitamins.
Also if a patient is deficient in Vitamin D, the T cells aren't activated. Glutathion also is important etc., but if you give the body what it needs for the immune system to function at full measure, you'll for sure be better off than if you are run down and vitamin deficient.
That’s the 64 million dollar question. Deagle just collected data and put it through the grinder.
Not at all political-or so I’ve heard.
Unfortunately access to what their results were based on isn’t accessible to the public.
I’m not sure the stuff we used to have access to is still available. With all the censorship—maybe they got chopped too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.