The Spike in Death Reports Following COVID-19 Vaccination Was Caused by a Mistake: CDC

A sudden jump in the post-COVID-19 vaccination death reports is not correct and was the result of an “error,” according to a U.S. health agency.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Friday said a passive reporting system it runs with the Food and Drug Administration had received 12,313 reports of death among those who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

That was a sharp increase from the previous number of reports, 6,079.

The jump would have effectively doubled the percentage of post-vaccination death reports, from 0.0018 percent to 0.0036 percent.

But a CDC spokeswoman told The Epoch Times the number the agency has displayed on its website is not correct.

“It is double what it was yesterday and so it definitely is incorrect,” the spokeswoman said. “We checked our stats internally and it’s only 6,000. So someone doing an update misrepresented that or made a mistake, in other words.”

“We caught it this morning ourselves and noticed that it had doubled suddenly,” she added.

The spokeswoman was unable to say when the error would be fixed. “It’s being worked out,” she said.

Investigative journalist Alex Berenson first reported on the number in question, which stems from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

“The new figure means CDC has now received more reports of deaths following Covid vaccination than ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED IN THE 30-YEAR HISTORY OF VAERS,” he wrote on Twitter.

“We don’t know at this point why the number of death reports in the system doubled in a week. Probably the answer is not a new surge in deaths, but older deaths being added to the system. But given VAERS’s importance as a monitoring mechanism, CDC must explain quickly,” he added.

Australia has had SIX alleged covid deaths THIS YEAR (915 deaths to date).

today, the FIFTH death THIS YEAR from vaccine has been reported:

22 July 2021: news.com.au: 44-yo Tasmanian man dies after receiving first dose of AstraZeneca
A 44-year-old man has died in hospital after receiving his first dose of AstraZeneca, after contracting the very rare blood-clotting side effect.
by Catie McLeod
The 44-year-old man, who died in hospital last weekend, was a confirmed case of the very rare blood-clotting syndrome thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, known as TTS.
He is the fifth Australian whose death has been linked to the AstraZeneca immunisation, all of which have occurred after the first dose of the vaccine...
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/44yo-tasmanian-man-dies-after-receiving-first-dose-of-astrazeneca/news-story/63176dcd36891c786fc5da0fbb4a87ed

Australia is in complete covid melt-down, closed State borders, healthy people lining up for hours to be tested (coerced in thousands of cases as they are caught via QR Codes being in “hot spots”), and others begging to be vaccinated.

...they would probably do it on the front end rather than having to go in and clean up after the fact. ...

Mistakes happen sometimes. Then the numbers must be "revised".

You can bet that this mistake won't happen again.

My personal estimate is that we have about 450,000 deaths caused by the mRNA treatment to date. They have been and will continue to be categorized as coincidental heart attacks, strokes, embolisms, and platelet destruction syndrome which have no connection with the jab that the patient received in the previous 30 days.

Note that over 200 million people in this country have received the treatment, so the estimated death rate is still very low. Not much comfort there for the families of the afflicted, but there it is.

Watch the life insurance companies and their shifting actuarial tables for the confirming indicators. Also follow the specialized industry journals which are studying death rates that are increasing at 25% more than expected (even accounting for the natural Boomer die-off). They are already hinting at the possibility of correlations with the mRNA treatment. No one will say that just yet.

It is younger people (25-60) who are seeing the higher-than expected increases. There is big money riding on getting these actuarial forecasts correct and they have usually been much more accurate than now. They have much more data than CDC and it is probably more accurate. And unbiased.

They will not allow themselves to lose big money on a politically correct narrative. They can buy, or at least rent, the necessary politicians to make sure they don't lose. Watch what they do.

If they wanted to manipulate the data they would probably do it on the front end rather than having to go in and clean up after the fact.

Sure ... in a perfectly corrupt world that would be true. But I'm certain not every CDC employee is evil, not everyone is going along with the experiment, not everyone is completely unaffected having no loved ones harmed by the jab, not everyone's heart is hardened to damage being done.

https://www.covidvaccinevictims.com/victims

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.