There are no scientific references in this article.
It is self-referential. The few references about the picture becoming clearer does NOT undermine TToE. Anymore than quantum physics is clarifying our picture of TToG (gravity).
You would never accept this level of claptrap from fake climate “scientists.”
Do not accept it from fake natural “scientists.”
crev.info has all the credibility of Bab Bee, without the yuks.
I speak of course to true Conservatives who are interested in facts and not apologetics.
Facts: I love them. I get the warm fuzzies when presented with some.
Did you mean that Dr. Bergman’s article was self-referential?
You do not seem to understand that he comments on an article in “New Scientist” by Alison George and Michael Marshall.
Here is the link for that article:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0262407921011222
I am registered with ScienceDirect through Elsevier. One must log in and pay $1.99 for the pdf, depending on how one is registered, such as through an institution, to read it in its entirety.
At my age it is very difficult for me to be respectful to an individual such as yourself who claims that the challenges to the evolution myth are unscientific. Of course that is not an argument anymore than is your ad hominem against crev.info likening them to “Bab Bee without the yuks”. Since you cannot engage with Dr. Bergman’s point you must pretend he doesn’t have one.
“Interested in facts and not apologetics,” you say?
“True Conservatives,” you say?
You can now go back to your religious group meeting and report on the effect of your mighty denunciation of us creationists. The other evolutionist fundamentalists will be proud of your defense of the “Truth”, saying, “You are a true Conservative!” as they pat your back and let you go first in line at the buffet table.