[JaguarXKE]

404 Page not found.

[ex91B10]

Bet they still cant’t drink or by beer though...

[CodeToad]

ping

[TianaHighrider]

Praise God for each and every win and good news!

[Disambiguator]

The thing is, you can OWN a handgun at age 18, but you just can’t buy one from a licensed dealer.

It’s like making aerial fireworks illegal to use, but you can still buy them.

[ProgressingAmerica]

This makes sense.

States have the authority to set an age, that’s how their constitutions are set up. The Federal Government has no purview here. Shall not be infringed is absolute.

[Dick Bachert]

[Impala64ssa]

Good!! When my Mom’s uncle was 18 we was being shot at by nazis. Fortunately thanks to his govt issued rifle and training he received courtesy of the US Army he took out a couple of them and was eventually HONORABLY DISCHARGED.

[Eleutheria5]

Stop the pigeon! Stop the pigeon!

[RandallFlagg]

Didn’t the ban originate from GCA 1968?

[zeugma]

Here is a Direct link to the decision iteself. Lots of good information in there.

[Nifty]

I’ve had issue with this forever. If we put an 19 year old in the back of a APC or a Humvee with a machine gun and ask them to go die for us, but they come back and can’t own a firearm....................no effing sense.

[Gay State Conservative]

Many states (almost all of them Rat Party cesspools) have blatantly unconstitutional laws violating 2nd Amendment rights. My state,for example,being the one that was just recently quashed in a 9-0 SCOUTUS vote on a 2A case,has a law stating that the state's Attorney General has the authority to deem a particular weapon "unsafe" and ban it from the state.

Why can't SCOTUS,once and for all,make it clear that "shall not be infringed" applies to every city and town,every county and every state in the nation???

[justme4now]

I only got part way through the "decision" before I had to stop!

I have problems with the following!

We then ask, as our precedent requires, whether the government has met its burden to justify its infringement of those rights under the appropriate level of scrutiny.

(Under the 2ND, There can be no justification to deny the 'right' to own a gun!)

... a federal law prevented her from buying from a licensed dealer who would perform a background check to verify that she was not a felon or other prohibited person.

(If a person is legally walking around as a free man, that is all one needs to know!
If that person has escaped from prison .. it is not up to the rest of us to prove that we aren't criminals!
Who could possibly be "another prohibited person?)

Later that year, Congress amended the law to prohibit licensed dealers from selling any firearm to those under 18 ..

(As has been ruled by the SCOTUS themselves:
In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.)

"All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
Marbury v. Madison

.......................................
I would also point out that ... All so called gun laws are unconstitutional!

The Constitution is a throttler on Government powers .. Not a yoke on "We The People"