Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Climate Justice Myth: How Green Energy Hurts the Poor, the Middle Class, and the Environment
pjmedia.com ^ | 7/12/2021 1708 hrs EDT | Stacy Lennox

Posted on 07/13/2021 4:45:28 PM PDT by rktman

Green New Deal proponents like to throw around the phrase “climate justice.” This phrase refers to the idea that marginalized communities are harmed the most by the predicted impacts of climate change. The reality is that green-energy initiatives often ravage these communities and the environment. The green-energy movement is nothing more than a massive wealth distribution scheme meant to fundamentally change the West’s economic systems.

The goal is evident when you hear Klaus Schwab, founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), talk about the “stakeholder capitalism” framework he has been pushing for the last 50 years. It is also evident in the Environmental, Social, and Governmental (ESG) business reporting framework proposed by the world’s largest financial institutions. It’s ominous that BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has decided to use this framework to evaluate investments.

You should be terrified when Democrats seem to embrace the idea that the government should take over credit scores. The federal government could apply the same ESG criteria to individuals, requiring them to purchase certain types of products or make particular “green investments” in their property or financial portfolios to maintain a decent score. Imagine what could happen to your score if you purchase a gun, homeschool your child, or subscribe to our VIP program.

The “E” is just a mechanism to force the “S” and the “G” portions of the framework. The Social and Governmental parts have the potential to be extraordinarily authoritarian and financially punish “wrong think.” However, the environmental portion harms marginalized populations, makes the middle class more impoverished, and hurts the environment. Here are a few, but by no means exhaustive, examples.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: climaeddon; climatechange; climatechangefraud; ecotossers; gangreen
Owowowowowowow! I know. So in order to make it sound SOOOOO much more betterer, let's rename this garbage, are you ready for it? CLIMATE EQUITY! BOOM! That'll get even the most recalcitrant folks on board. Right? Anyone got the number to get ahold of the brilliant folks up in Sun Valley Idaho at their confab?
1 posted on 07/13/2021 4:45:28 PM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

AOC Calls for Infrastructure Plan to Include Climate Spending ‘Centering Front-Line Indigenous Black and Brown’ Communities

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aoc-calls-for-infrastructure-plan-to-include-climate-spending-e2-80-98centering-front-line-indigenous-black-and-brown-e2-80-99-communities/ar-AAM7mVQ?ocid=a2hs


2 posted on 07/13/2021 4:47:09 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

climate justice = anyone can burn alive in an electric car no matter how rich you are


3 posted on 07/13/2021 4:49:03 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

This green new deal is based on the most regressive taxes - on energy and fuel - which hit the working poor hardest.


4 posted on 07/13/2021 4:51:20 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Rats already know that. It will be their excuse to double or triple the $$$ needed for the Green Nude Eel.


5 posted on 07/13/2021 4:57:28 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Comitia asinorum et rhinocerum delenda sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hard left environmentalists are “watermelons”.
Green on the outside, red in the inside. Communism in a funny party hat.

CC


6 posted on 07/13/2021 5:18:12 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Environment, sustainability, climate change-—NONSENSE! This is about control and taxation, nothing more.


7 posted on 07/13/2021 5:45:49 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“The green-energy movement is nothing more than a massive wealth distribution scheme meant to fundamentally change the West’s economic systems.”

This says it all. But the key to all of this “change” is fraud and ignorance. “Fraud” is what they are trying to feed us, and “ignorance” will become the new “virtue”. But reality is something altogether different. Economic collapse, famine, and ecological destruction is what all this portends, not sustainability.

I wonder what Greta Thunberg will think, if she and her future family are relegated to freeze in the dark, as they starve? Perhaps she might change her name to “Regreta”. She will have plenty of regrets, I’ll wager.


8 posted on 07/13/2021 6:35:43 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (As if.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Bkmk


9 posted on 07/13/2021 6:39:54 PM PDT by sauropod (The smartphone is the retina of the mind's eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson