If the fraud isn’t fixed Jesus Christ could run with Napoleon as his veep and would loose.
Re fraud:
That is the elephant in the room that people don’t seem to realize, still… or refuse to acknowledge.
The one, single, issue that animates Democrats to absolute fury, is the issue of auditing the election results from 2020; that tells you all you need to know.They have their Talking Heads and sycophants working overtime on all of their talkshows, calling it “The Big Lie”…
Well of course but I wouldn’t be entirely apoplectic.
Even with an unprecedented level of fraud and a hostile media, a mere 42,921 more votes in AZ, GA and WI give Trump 269 electoral votes and change the outcome of the election. Here’s a thing I made of the closest elections in the 20th and 21st century in real terms. I calculated the smallest number of votes that would be needed to be gained (or deleted from the winner) to change the outcome and calculated what % of total national “popular vote” this number represented. Number of states needed to flip is in parenthesis.
2000 538 (1) 0.0005%
1916 3,774 (1) 0.0204%
2020 42,921 (3) 0.0270%
1976 25,581 (2) 0.0314%
1960 23,745 (5) 0.0345% or 40,859 (3) 0.0594%
2016 77,739 (3) 0.0567%
2004 118,602 (1) 0.0970%
1948 58,587 (3) 0.1201%
In terms of the total % of popular votes you see only ultra close 2000 and 1916 were closer. Despite all the fraud they succeeded by the skin of their goddamn commie teeth.
Note also how scant Carter’s victory really was, as close as Kennedy’s, 25K votes in Ohio and Mississippi. In Nixon’s case I aimed to give him a majority but it’s possible he could have made a deal with conservative dem electors if Kennedy hadn’t gotten a majority. GOP was actually crushed in 1948 but Dewey nearly won anyway because of Henry Wallace’s third party bid (he cost Truman NY and nearly CA and OH, though he wasn’t on the ballot in necessary Illinois).