Evolution is just the excuse to inject some more Synthetic Racism into the mix. The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.
“Scientific” America should take some time to denounce Nation of Islam’s radical racist take on history and their story of the wise African scientist “Yakub” who made white devils to be the embodiment of all evil in the world.
CRT teachings are pushing that line of thought in our schools. Born with “original sin” merely by skin color.
Especially with Darwin writing in it his observation that red ants carried their slave black ants in their mouths and that the red ants might cease to exist without their black ant slaves.
That was published in 1859. The very next year the Christian abolitionists won the presidential election (1860 - Lincoln). Then the next year (1861) the Dims seceded to literally fight a war to keep blacks in chains.
But, hey. Let's keep saying the Bible is the one that's racist. LOL
Let’s see . . the first two thirds of the modern Bible was written by Jews. The last third was written by diverse authors.
How, again, is this White Supremacy?
The evo-religion has many many cult members here on FR....
…Man, like every other animal, has no doubt advanced to his present high condition through a struggle for existence consequent on his rapid multiplication; and if he is to advance still higher, it is to be feared that he must remain subject to a severe struggle. Otherwise he would sink into indolence, and the more gifted men would not be more successful in the battle of life than the less gifted. Hence our natural rate of increase, though leading to many and obvious evils, must not be greatly diminished by any means. There should be open competition for all men; and the most able should not be prevented by laws or customs from succeeding best and rearing the largest number of offspring.""We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”
-Charles Darwin, Descent of Man
In the Darwinian view of humans as animals, what would cause us to stop practicing animal husbandry within our own species? Reduce the meaning of "human" to "just another animal", and eugenics is fair game. Scientific data is well supported in animal husbandry. Eugenics is only abhorrent to those who recognize that there is something transcendently special about humans.
In the early decades of the 20th century, Human Zoos were created where thousands of indigenous peoples were put on public display and touted as “missing links” between man and apes. Their public display was arranged with the enthusiastic support of the most elite members of the scientific community, and it was promoted uncritically by America's leading newspapers.
With Darwinism, there is always an inferior race and a superior race - there must be an intermediate bridging the gap - or as Darwin states:
“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”If Darwin allowed Dawkins to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist then he also allowed scientists to be an intellectually fulfilled racist.
- Charles Darwin, Descent of Man
Racism and eugenics were the hallmarks of the theory of human evolution in the early 20th century, representing a clear consensus of evolutionary biologists as well as other scientists and leaders in higher education and government (endorsed by the Supreme Court in 1926). Eugenics is an ugly part of American history that was taught to our children (See: Hunter’s Civic Biology ) - a movement that caused the compulsory sterilization laws in 30 U.S. states that resulted in more than 60,000 sterilizations of disabled.
At the core of the current theory of evolution is materialism/naturalism and this is a worldview with consequences. For example, as Stephen Meyer points out -the constitution assumes:
In contrast, under the materialistic picture of reality pervasive in our culture, you get this:
These are not Conservative principles and is partially to blame for our current state of affairs.
When some die they are gonna have a big hot surprise..
No surprise here...we were warned long ago:
“Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.
“Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”
Matthew 5:10-12
Communists abhor religion of any type.
According to the Bible, everyone since the Flood is descended from Noah and his wife. Also, according to the Bible, Noah’s wife is a descendent of Cain, so we all are. So how do she associate “descendant of Cain” with a particular race?
Anyone who still believes the ‘man and chimps’ DNA are 98% the same should look at the number magic needed to make that claim. If you can open your mind to the possibility that the data was ‘massaged, I would suggest the following YT video.
https://youtu.be/deV99oPnKlI?t=586
It is from Answers in Genesis, but if you can put aside any objections to that for a minute, I think you might find that the section on genetics was well-presented, reasonable and believable enough to at least plant a seed of curiosity in your mind.
No, they want it and all religion gone because as long as you have a creator, who endowed you with rights, they have resistance to them making you property of the state.
If your rights do not flow from your creator then they are just granted and taken away by fiat arbitrarily which is what they want
No.
They want to kill you.
The goal is eliminating Christianity, White man’s religion. At the same time they are promoting a religion that caters to man’s basest instincts, and which will be happy to wipe out every Christian.
Evolution is just the excuse to inject some more Synthetic Racism into the mix. The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.
Well, the evolution theory does have something to do with apes I believe.
PS - It's hard not to notice the left calls Muslim Arabs non-white and Christian Arabs, white. Yet more evidence that white/non-white are political categories.
There could have been animals that evolved to some extent, but if so, then they did it in this earths first creation, not post Genesis 1:2.
There are really only 3 choices.
1) Mankind evolved and the Bible is a lie.
2) God created mankind in His image in the beginning and young earth creationists are correct.
3) God created mankind in His image after destroying whatever was here on earth after Genesis 1:1 and before Genesis 1:2. In that case, young earth creationists are incorrect.
Choose wisely!
Bkml
Actually, the word adom/Adam means ruddy one or red one. No white or black there.
Interesting twist. It was the evolutionist who saw the African as a primitive being, not fully human. And Margaret Sanger initiated the reduction of these sub-humans.