MIT Scientist: Covid Vaccines May Cause Diseases in '10 to 15 years' (Exclusive Video)

RAIR Foundation USA ^ | July 2, 2021 | RAIR Foundation

[E. Pluribus Unum]

“We are in for a big surprise down the road,” Dr. Stephanie Seneff predicts.

RAIR Foundation USA is honored to present an exclusive interview with prominent scientist Stephanie Seneff about her take on the impact of mRNA vaccines. RAIR also features Scientist Madeline Weld, Ph.D., Physiology and Biology who has graciously used her background to write about the interview for RAIR’s readers (scroll down).

Dr. Seneff serves as Senior research scientist at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and is the author of Toxic Legacy, How the Weedkiller Glyphosate Is Destroying Our Health and the Environment. The MIT scientist wrote a research paper with Dr. Greg Nigh titled: “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19” for the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.

...

• Dr. Seneff “anticipates that there will be long-term damage that won’t instantly be linked to the vaccine. Developments, such as an increase in auto-immune and neurodegenerative diseases, which may take 10 to 15 years before manifesting themselves.” “We are in for a big surprise down the road,” she predicts.
• Dr. Seneff believes the vaccine would exacerbate symptoms of those with Parkinson’s.
• Those who claimed that mRNA would not impact DNA are “wrong.”
• Spike protein “really has become the most toxic part of the virus” and exists when Covid is gone.
• “Among the possibilities she foresees is an increase in Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (CJD), a prion disease (or protein misfolding disease) comparable to mad cow disease.”
• “There is an epidemic of Alzheimer disease, which people are getting at an increasingly younger age. The recklessly and haphazardly implementation of the vaccine roll-out will contribute to this trend.”

Watch the video and see more below:

[Ceebass]

Post the link.....

It’s in the 3rd paragraph of the article!!!!

Did you read the article before you panned it?

[ETCM]

Weak excuse for an idiotic post. But hey, that’s your story, so go ahead and stick to it.

[PGalt]

thanks for posting

[Pelham]

“It does grant her credentials for not being a charlatan.”

A charlatan is someone who pretends expertise in a field where they have none.

Seneff is claiming to be an expert on the biochemistry of glyphosate and of the human body. She has neither.

Likewise a biochemist who pretends expertise in computer science when they have none are themselves charlatans.

It’s really that simple. Well, except perhaps in the pretend world of sloppy thinking and illogic that Seneff and her fan club here inhabit.

[Pelham]

There’s a lot of links in the article. No one knows which one you were referring to without you identifying it. Try using your head for a change.

[wgmalabama]

Honestly. Honest answer please. Do you think the vaccine was rushed. I have my opinions on why it was (first genElation was nasty). I’m afraid that if it turns bad PDJT will be made the scape goat. Disagree with that aspect. The vac was rushed. It would be interesting to know the intel at the time.

Is the vaccine needed now ? Seems the disease risk is low and The vaccine long term risk might now outweigh the benefits.

Honestly, is this all worth it. The only sane answer is no. I am not talking vaccinating high risk people, nursing homes ... I’m talking 12-29 year olds please be honest. The answer is NO.

[Pelham]

“There is a 40 page paper with facts and logic at the link with 10 pages of references. You should read it.”

This will be fun.

The head of the “International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research” is a linguistics PhD named John Oller Jr. and who claims to be an instructor at the “Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge”. More about that later.

Here’s his linked in page where you’ll find his CV, which oddly enough includes no medical education at all. Imagine that.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-w-oller-jr-3947b223

His 2nd in command is Christopher A. Shaw, PhD, Professor, Department of Ophthalmology. Well at least he is somewhat in the medical field, although it’s eyes and not virology.

Shaw was the coauthor of a study claiming a link between aluminum in vaccines and autism. But the paper was retracted due to data manipulation; “ figures published in the study were deliberately altered before publication”.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ubc-autsism-vaccine-paper-retraction-chris-shaw-1.4351855

“Co-authored by Dr. Chris Shaw and Lucija Tomljenovic, it reported aluminum-triggered responses “consistent with those in autism.” Shaw said he and Tomljenovic drew their conclusions from data that was “compiled” and “analyzed” for the paper, rather than raw data.

“Dr. Chris Shaw, a neurobiologist and professor at UBC, co-authored the paper. He said he requested a retraction from the journal and notified the university. (Chris Shaw)
However, subsequent scrutiny has raised questions about the validity of the data, with one doctor calling the paper “anti-vaccine pseudoscience.”

“The allegations were published last week on Retraction Watch, a site that reports on withdrawn papers as “a window into the scientific process.”

“By the middle of September, commenters on PubPeer — a database where users can examine and comment on published scientific papers — pointed out that figures in the study appeared to have been altered, and in one case lifted directly from a 2014 study also authored by Shaw and Tomljenovic.”

This “Journal” has issued exactly 3 issues. This isn’t PubMed or anything remotely like it. It’s a forum for Oller, Shaw, and their friends to publish their own material and give themselves a veneer of respectability. If their studies were legit they would be published by nih.ncbi PubMed which actually is peer reviewed and publishes thousands of papers.

The “Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge” actually is mentioned in a March 2020 nih.ncbi paper, but maybe not in a good way; see what you think-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144200/

“Dr James Lyons-Weiler, the CEO of the “Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge,” made an appalling online statement on 3 February 2020, which claimed the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic was most likely constructed via laboratory recombination. In the results, he showed SARS-CoV-2 had a unique inserted sequence located in the middle of its spike glycoprotein gene that had no match in other coronaviruses. Furthermore, he claimed this unique sequence was similar to some sequence in pShuttle-SN a common expression vector used in research laboratory.

To check on his claim, we ran a thorough analysis on his results, and found some serious mistakes in his distorted analysis. Thus, we drew an opposite conclusion that there was no evidence to support the theory for the formation of SARS-CoV-2 in a laboratory.

First of all, this unique sequence is not specific to SARS-CoV-2. By aligning several coronaviruses discovered from natural sources, our result showed that this “unique” sequence from SARS-CoV-2 was also found in other coronavirus, with a high sequence identity. This indicated that this particular fragment in SARS-CoV-2 spike gene was widely spread in naturally existing coronaviruses and was not from laboratory.

Second, how should we explain the sequence similarity between this SARS-CoV-2 spike gene fragment and the sequence in pShuttle-SN? This is indeed another misleading statement from James Lyons-Weiler, who described pShuttle-SN as a vector. We carefully analysed the source of pShuttle-SN, and realized that pShuttle-SN was built in 2005 as an expression plasmid carrying sequence of spike gene from SARS-CoV, the coronavirus responsible for 2003 SARS epidemic. The pShuttle-SN should not be called as a vector but a plasmid generated from Adeno-XTM to study SARS-CoV. The real empty vector was Adeno-XTM expression system, which had no significant homology to any part of the genome of SARS-CoV-2. Since pShuttle-SN had a fragment of the spike gene from SARS-CoV, which was similar to that from SARS-CoV-2, it was no wonder the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene fragment was found to match with some sequence in pShuttle-SN. On an added note, our results indicated its sequence similarity to the pShuttle-SN fragment was lower than to the natural coronaviral sequences.

In conclusion, we found the so-called unique sequence in the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene was widely available in coronavirus from natural source, opposite to what James Lyons-Weiler had claimed. The pShuttle-SN plasmid contained a fragment from the spike gene of SARS-nCoV, which caused the similarity match between it and the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequence. We call upon Dr James Lyons-Weiler to take his responsibility to make a public correction to his un-supported claim.

[jonrick46]

Dr. Seneff is uniquely unqualified to be writing about medicine, chemistry, or toxicology. She is not an M.D.; far from it. Senneff’s advanced degrees include M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering, and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Her position is Senior Research Scientist at the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT, which can only lead me to conclude that I should have an electrician remove my gallbladder.

[Rebelbase]

[jonrick46]

Dr. Seneff has no education in the vaccine field. Her writing about Glyphosate caausing COVID-19 have received severe criticism. She is indeed another anti-vaxxer spreading misinformation.

[jonrick46]

Good luck with your illusions. The Moderna tests required a stack of documentation that would sack up to the height of the Emmpire State Building. If that stack was right in front of you, would you say that it was an illusion?

[Safrguns]

Nothing tells the truth like a good graph.

[roving]

The site you got that from are also global warming idiots. No credibility.

https://www.mcgill.ca/channels/article/mobilizing-small-businesses-fight-climate-change

[jonrick46]

Your post would make a great satire in a theater production. It indeed shows much creativity that I would envy.

I can imagine the words, “The Great Vax” in neon above the theater entrance. I can imagine the opening scene with a dark line of people distanced 6 feet apart walking along to get their Vax with the sounds of people screaming in horror as the Great Vax gives them the plunge and . . .

Oh boy! That play would be great fun to watch!

[roving]

No vaccine was needed. Just a fraction of the reported deaths were actually from covid. They blamed all deaths on covid as long as they tested positive using a test that isn’t meant for covid.

These vaccines have the worst track record for being unsafe in the history of vaccines.

[Born to Conserve]

She reminds me of people I know with cognitive dissonance. But, I know a lot of chemistry and biochemistry (for an amateur), and I didn’t hear a lot of mistakes. She may be really bright.

Think about Mel Gibson’s character in “Conspiracy Theory”. Same chattering.

If she is crazy, she is the kind of crazy that can give you ideas. Think of the broken clocks that are right twice a day and imagine a broken clock that is right dozens of times a day.

Definitely food for thought here. But think carefully.

[Irenic]

I’m so sick of this Covid crud.

Nobody cared much if someone had the flu shot or not, why this hyper concern if somebody is vaccinated for Covid or not?

A childhood friend that’s living in San Fran area of California called me tonight, she’s complaining that she can’t get her extra 300 unemployment and that she needs it until September.

I had some sympathy until suddenly it was an attack on unvaccinated people and Texas especially— we’re keeping her from working.

Yep, she said she saw on the news, Texas had the highest rate of infection. I bit my tongue through some other leftist crud but once it became my fault for her not working—I was done.

I just can’t do it.

[roving]

You seem like the kind of person who sits with other sheep who got the shot and exchange stories about you experience.
Probably wear your vaccination card stapled to your shirt.

[familyop]

She’s a laugh riot!

Who is Stephanie Seneff?
VaxoPedia
By Vincent Iannelli, MD
July 28, 2017
https://vaxopedia.org/2017/07/28/who-is-stephanie-seneff/

“Stephanie Seneff has found a new way to blame vaccines for making kids autistic – she claims that they are contaminated with glyphosate...Stephanie Seneff is a computer scientist from MIT who thinks that exposure to glyphosphate is causing everything from autism and Alzheimer’s to peanut allergies and Celiac disease. Interestingly, she had another theory that all of these things were caused by low fat diets and vitamin D deficiency before she got obsessed with glyphosate.”

[Freedom56v2]

The RAIR Foundation?
The Roswell Artist-in-Residence Foundation is funded in part by the National Endowment for the Arts...
Scientists?
Ha!

---

Seriously? If you are going to write a condescending/ critical/snarky, you really should make sure your research is correct...

RAIR Foundation?

RAIR Foundation!

https://rairfoundation.com/about/

RAIR Foundation USA (Rise Align Ignite Reclaim) is a grassroots activist organization comprised of everyday Americans leading a movement to RECLAIM our REPUBLIC from the network of individuals and organizations waging war on Americans, our CONSTITUTION, our BORDERS and our JUDEO-CHRISTIAN VALUES.

RAIR is an integrated media platform amplifying the voices of the silent majority, while informing the citizenry of the daily ASSAULTS on FREEDOM and fostering grassroots leaders and activists in order to COMBAT the THREATS from Islamic supremacists, RADICAL LEFTISTS, and their allies.

Using RAIR’s “Four Pillar” strategy of Education, Community, Action and Coalition; RAIR’s grassroots-based approach empowers citizens to neutralize these attacks on their communities.

RAIR’s bottom-up approach to neutralizing the attacks on our liberties has the potential to shift the power back to the citizens. RAIR will document the activities of key subversive players that currently enjoy little scrutiny in the current media landscape, exposing their activities and creating strategies to counter them. RAIR will unleash unprecedented citizen activism and cultivate community leaders, filling a gaping void in the movement for liberty.

RAIR Foundation...Has NOTHING TO DO WITH ROSEWELL OR ARTISTS...Would not be surprised to find a Freeper or two who belong...HA