Posted on 06/27/2021 9:27:40 AM PDT by proust
Don’t think of this as a bad sign, it’s exactly what’s expected from an effective but imperfect jab.
A MailOnline headline on 13 June read: “Study shows 29% of the 42 people who have died after catching the new strain had BOTH vaccinations.” In Public Health England’s technical briefing on 25 June, that figure had risen to 43% (50 of 117), with the majority (60%) having received at least one dose.
It could sound worrying that the majority of people dying in England with the now-dominant Delta (B.1.617.2) variant have been vaccinated. Does this mean the vaccines are ineffective? Far from it, it’s what we would expect from an effective but imperfect vaccine, a risk profile that varies hugely by age and the way the vaccines have been rolled out.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
One of the guests on the Dark Horse blog said, roughly, if I wanted to design an experiment to optimize the evolution of a virus, I would do nothing different than what the government is doing with the vaccines. (Optimizing the evolution of a deadly virus is not something the government wanted to do. It is an unexpected side effect of the hysteria to get a vaccine as soon as possible.)
The spike protein the vaccines induce our immune system to produce, is, in itself, a cytotoxin. This was not something the vaccine designers expected. This is why, when the vaccine gets into cells not in the target muscle, like the heart, that the heart gets inflamed.
>>Nothing like hoodwinking the People<<
Interesting masonic term used. lol>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well I suppose you could say that people in general have forgotten how to meet on the square and level.We live in the age of lies and prevarication.
Why that’s Pierre DeLecto!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.