Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
All Brandi Levy needed was a good spanking from her father.
They didn't any more important issues to rule on?
The question before the court was if the cheerleader was Hot or Not. Justice Thomas looked at the evidence, explaining his dissent.
400 plus peaceful protesters are having their first amendment rights violated right now, some sare still in solitary confinement because of it
Justice Thomas' dissent begins on page 34 pf the above opinion.
Why the heck did that have to go to the SCOTUS?
The very first ruling (every subsequent one...) should have been “It’s not a threat to the school or to a student at the school so it is none of the school’s business.”
Do you believe if you go to school or work the school and business have the right to punish you for what you say outside school and work?
They don't.
This is a victory for free speech and a blow to cancel culture.
A long time ago, there was the concept that what you did on your own time was ... well, YOUR time and you could do any legal activity. You know ... freedom.
Then the left starting pushing their cancel culture and they are trying to change it so that you have to conform to their agenda, not only at work, but in school, home and out in public as well.
Good to see that people are getting tired of this BS and are pushing back with lawsuits. Will it be enough? I dont know.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
This is a critical ruling!
It says free speech extends to social media.
ie you can’t attack or ban people from employment based on what they say on social media.
What is a self-deleting Snapchat? You post it and it deletes itself? That don’t make no sense as the hillbilly once said. ...brilliant.
Seems like a lot of people forget that these First Amendment cases don’t reach the Big Bench because the people involved are pleasant and admirable, and gosh darn it people like them.
It really doesn’t matter how foul and despicable the ‘speaker’ might be, they still have their First Amendment rights. And NOTHING in the Bill of Rights says anything about limiting those rights based on age.
Which brings up other interesting questions, of course.
Large tattoos at that age? What’s her future plans? A stripper’s pole?
American law..like much of politics..has become a clown show.
Now Levy and family must sue skool for legal fees.
