Posted on 06/19/2021 8:29:09 AM PDT by eastexsteve
I love this one! Read it. It basically says that if the fed wants to come knocking on your door over a federal gun law, they will be on their own. Where I live, they can't round up enough feds to play with a Ouija board!
They ship em in when need be.
Where’s the one for cans?
That isn’t going to stop them. Texas needs to go for the kill shot and pass an amendment to the state Constitution— then TRAIN each generation thereafter.
That ends the BS.
They just signed the same type of bill here in MO.
It looks to me like the Democrats aka Demoncrats are consolidating power. The part that really scares me is them destroying the nations police forces and at the same time purging the military of “domestic terrorists” aka conservatives so that what is left will gladly obey their master Biden & admin and take control of every states’ capitals to “restore peace and tranquility”.
The problem they have in my county is that nobody likes them, and people look for any excuse to confront them. They remember Waco. They pay homage to this:
I can't remember the bill number, but it passed also.
Like the feds want local witnesses to their corruption on the scene anyway.
The problem with that is it will seriously deplete their ranks by kicking out the conservatives. And, since most of the military is from the south (Texas is the second-largest contributing state), guess whose side they would be fighting on.
You Tube has video of the Governor signing that into law. Suppressors made in Texas for Texans and that stay in Texas are legal. Federal law does not prohibit in-state only products. Montana and Idaho some years ago set the precedent with in-state rifles that made the ATF wet their panties.
Yeah well.....
.... I’m a Molon Labe guy. So Molon Labe
our neighbor points out that the more SS officers the feds ship in, the more targets they provide honest loyal Americans seeking to just defend their lives, families, homes, and property
You will resist the Feds when we cannot even have fair elections??
Good luck hero.
Is the Federal govt going to provide secure housing for the families? Do they know what civil war looks like? These RATs can’t plan well enough to run a lemonade stand.
A State Pistol,
Carry Law,
No to Feds,
And Cans !?!
.
God Bless Texas!
I agree that they want to nationalize everything, for control, but who do you think will make up the ranks of what’s left?
It isn’t going to be the country boy, down the street that’s wanted to be in the infantry sine he was old enough to hold stick pretending it was his rifle.
The ranks will be filled with kids like, Heather, who has two mommies.
Army Recruitment Ads: China vs Russia vs USA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfe6d6MzeLM
https://taskandpurpose.com/health-fitness/army-physical-fitness-crisis/
https://sofrep.com/news/a-failing-army-most-recruits-cant-complete-basic-fitness-test/
Thank you for posting eastexsteve.
Pro-2nd Amendment patriots need to start diplimatically asking federal gun agents what specific constitutional clause the so-called federal gun laws that they are enforcing are based on. Then note blank look responses in FR.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Note that it was argued that one possible problem with introducing the Bill of Rights (BoR) is this. Since the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to deal with the some of the rights protected by the BoR, peacetime gun rights for example, the BoR would ultimately eclipse the idea that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to make peacetime restrictive gun laws, even if there was no BoR.
“The defenders of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights would undermine the idea of a government with limited powers." — Ed Feulner, We Almist Didn't Have the Bill of Rights, CNSNews, 12-14-16."
This is the problem that we now have, particularly since parents are no longer making sure that their children are being taught about the significance of constitutionally enumerated federal government powers.
Regarding unconstitutional (imo) peacetime federal gun laws, it is ironic that the states have since given the feds the express 14th Amendment power only to strengthen constitutionally enumerated rights, including 2nd Amendment.
The remedy for unconstitutionally big federal government that oppresses patriots by trying to take away their guns...
For starters, Trump's red tsunami of patriot voters need to primary candidates for federal and state lawmakers who don't clearly promise to do the following. New lawmakers need to make laws that require federal courts and law enforcement officials to inform those accused of breaking a federal law of the specific constitutional clause that the law is based on for further scrutiny of the constitutionality of the law.
Again, consider the following excerpt from United States v. Butler.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
I think it’ll be interesting to see how this all plays out. I’m watching for sure. Where local LE comes down on this will certainly be mixed. I’m unsure about sheriffs and state. Anyway good luck to the guys willing to be test cases. Even so a jury gets the final say. My hats off to your legislature and gov for having so spine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.