Posted on 06/17/2021 7:35:21 AM PDT by Red Badger
They're not "anti-vaxxers", they're opposed to forced experimentation on human beings as was specifically addressed in the Nuremberg Code in 1947 after the Nazis decided to commit atrocities on those they considered less than human.
My conclusion?
From Top to Bottom, they all lied about the stats from the beginning and at ever stage since then. Even after they new they had problems, they simply lied more.
I never believed their published stats. I don’t believe anything from the Media, the Experts or from the Fed Gov.
I opted out, will not participate.
Which of those disciplines best qualifies the doctor to opine on vaccines and infectious diseases? Or are all those doctor thingies alike?
One doesn’t need to be a genius to avoid going to an orthopedic surgeon for infectious disease and vaccine advice.
“ Which of those disciplines best qualifies the doctor to opine on vaccines and infectious diseases? Or are all those doctor thingies alike?”
Well, post your credentials here and we can judge if you are a credible source.
Be sure to list your publications.
I’m not relying on my credentials, I’m relying on my observation about the flaws in his analysis.
Likewise, I didn’t start out criticizing his piece based on his credentials but on his choosing unrealistic dates for when populations got vaccinated.
Do you have something to say about my critique?
Internet doctors with Credentials? LOL!
Well, fair enough, but without your credentials we know nothing about the value of your "observation.
Not sure you’ve thought this line of argument through. If credentials determine correctness Fauci’s immaculate.
It’s trivially easy to find strong vaccine supporters with better qualifications than Dr. Delepine.
If you’re not comfortable using your own reasoning powers to evaluate these claims, fine, but blindly trusting the person with the longest resume may not serve you well.
It is never size, it is expertise.
The man is trained in 2 medical areas, has had a very long and successful practice with real patients, has an expertise in statistical analysis, and is widely published.
I consider all of those areas to add expertise and credibility to this doctor.
Why do you say that? Moderna claims the same basic thing in their filings with the SEC. They said it was considered gene therapy.
“ Not sure you’ve thought this line of argument through. If credentials determine correctness Fauci’s immaculate.”
Fauci has been nothing but a bureaucrat for decades. He also funded gain of function research which likely caused this in the first place. Not too wise to use him as an example.
Take the jab if you want but don’t get all pissy when others point out things that go against the narrative you and CNN have found yourselves in the same side of,
You’ll be very hard pressed to find someone with better credentials to deal with a viral pandemic. Like him or not, that’s just a fact.
It was the FReeper I was talking to who was touting the importance of credentials, not me. Maybe take it up with them?
“ You’ll be very hard pressed to find someone with better credentials to deal with a viral pandemic. Like him or not, that’s just a fact.
Despite his credentials, he has performed terribly.
The man is corrupt and compromised and funded the lab that unleashed the pandemic.
So incredibly embarrassing. Do you actually believe this nonsense?
Because there is no “gene editing” involved. If Moderna actually said that, they are taking liberties with the term. A vaccine is not a ‘therapy’. A therapy is what you give to a person already suffering from a disease to treat that disease. A vaccine is to prevent the occurrence of a disease. By definition it cannot be therapy and certainly not ‘gene therapy’.
Which reminds me, I still need to answer your question on the definition of a vaccine. I haven’t forgotten, just kept putting it off. I will get to it at some point.
They changed the definition of vaccine to include these gene therapy things during the pandemic. If you try to provide proof, make sure you go back in time as words matter, and changing definitions don’t count.
They (Moderna) indeed said it was considered gene therapy. I suspect they know more about the products they developed than you do. I also don’t think they would be sloppy with their words in an SEC filing.
You do know that none of the “vaccines” actually PREVENT the disease, right? That’s not news to anyone so I assume you know that. Knowing that makes your point about a vaccine being to prevent the occurrence of a disease moot. None of them do that. They are supposed to lower your reaction to it. You know, like a therapy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.