Posted on 06/17/2021 7:35:21 AM PDT by Red Badger
This article by Dr Gérard Delépine was first published in French on Global Research’s French language website mondialisation.ca. The English text below is an AI Translation with some minor edits by Global Research. This article demonstrates unequivocally that mortality and morbidity has increased dramatically as a result of the vaccine. The incidence of Covid positive cases has also increased.
“And everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months”
Dr Delépine carefully analyses the pre and post vaccine trends for 14 countries in major regions of the World.
The latest official figures for the European Union which are rarely acknowledged by the mainstream media indicate the following:
From late December 2020 to May 22, 2021:
12,184 deaths and 1,196,190 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots (Moderna, Pfizer-BionTech; AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen). Serious injuries are of the order of 604,744 (i.e more than 50% of total injuries) The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA gene-edited vaccine has resulted in the largest number of fatalities: Total reactions for its mRNA vaccine Tozinameran: 5,961 deaths and 452,779 injuries to 22/05/2021 While Pfizer has the largest numbers of deaths and injuries, the EU Commission has largely placed the blame on AstraZeneka.
Ironically, not only does Pfizer have a criminal record with the US Department of Justice for “fraudulent marketing”, the EU Commission has chosen Pfizer BioNTech as its “Reliable Partner” for the production of 1.8 billion doses over the next 3-4 years, in a contract which is currently under negotiation.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, May 27, 2021
Two months ago, we tried to alert people to the paradoxical results of the covid19 vaccines by publishing the pre- and post-vaccination mortality curves for Israel and Great Britain [1] which already showed that these vaccinations were followed by ‘a considerable increase in contamination and mortality lasting 6 to 8 weeks after the start of vaccination. [2]
Since this period, vaccination campaigns have spread worldwide even to countries where covid was not present. And everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months. [3]
How many deaths and severe accidents will it take for executives, WHO, health agencies FDA, EMA among others, to look at the proven results of this experimental pseudo-vaccination in the real world and derive the results from it? consequences ?
Reminder of the proven facts published by the WHO We present below the epidemic curves of the most vaccinated countries as published by the WHO (with our comments in red).
ASIA In Nepal, a country of 28 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign, using the Chinese vaccine and the Indian Astra Zeneca, began at the end of January 2021. So far, after ten months of the epidemic, the country had 270,092 confirmed cases and 2017 deaths and the daily average of new cases s ‘amounted to 350. Four months after vaccination began, the epidemic has exploded with a current average of 8,000 new cases daily. As of May 22, Nepal had 497,052 (+ 90%) confirmed cases and 6,024 deaths (+ 200%.)
In Thailand, a country of 70 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign using the Chinese vaccine began in the first week of March. So far, since the start of the epidemic, the country has only recorded 25,000 infected and 83 deaths attributed to Covid19.
Since the start of vaccination, in 2 months, the number of infected has multiplied by 5 (123,066 on 22/5) and that of deaths by 9 (735 on 22/5). In Cambodia, a country of 27 million inhabitants
In Mongolia, a country of 3.3 million inhabitants
South America In Colombia , a country of 50 million inhabitants country severely affected by the disease, the epidemic began to decline sharply until the start of the vaccination campaign on February 18, 2021. Since then, the number of daily infections has quadrupled and daily mortality has multiplied by 3
Chile, country of 18 million inhabitants Vaccination began on December 24 and a total of nearly 17.1 million doses of the vaccine have been administered to less than 20 million people. But despite the highest vaccination coverage rate in South America and harsh confinements, the number of daily infections and the number of deaths remain close to triple what they were before the start of the vaccination campaign …
In Brazil, a country of 217 million inhabitants Vaccination began on January 18 as weekly mortality stabilized around 7,000
Middle East In the United Arab Emirates, a country of 10.5 million inhabitants
EUROPE In Hungary, a country of 9.8 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign, which began at the end of February, was followed by a sharp increase in weekly contaminations, which rose from 25,576 on February 25 to 62,265 a month later, before gradually falling back to the pre-vaccination level. In two and a half months, Hungary has doubled its figures of infected (400,000 to 800,000) and deaths (from 14,000 to 29,000) reached after 11 months of epidemic
In Romania, a country of 20 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign began at the end of December at a time when the epidemic was waning, and according to official data from May 4, 21 Bucharest has the highest vaccination rate in the country with 31.2% of its eligible population vaccinated. . But shortly after the start of vaccination, the number of daily infections and mortality increased. Before vaccination after ten months of the epidemic, Romania had 618,000 infected and 15,000 dead. After five months of vaccination, she counts twice as much.
Monaco, country of 38,000 inhabitants had only 3 deaths before vaccination and 32 since vaccination
Gibraltar, 34,000 inhabitants : vaccination of the entire population was followed by an 800% increase in mortality from 10 to 94)
What can be deduced from these official data. Hypotheses The Israeli and British Pyrrhic victories [4]
Vaccination advocates claim vaccinations in Israel and Britain have been successful, as current, daily contaminations and mortality are low.
But these apparent successes correspond in fact to the disappearance of a large part of the people at risk (the “harvesting ”) achieved by vaccination and to the spontaneous regression of the disease observed also in countries with little vaccination.
Vaccine “harvesting” In these two countries, the mortality attributed to Covid increased sharply for 4 to 6 weeks, equaling all the deaths in 2020. The covid per vaccination mortality curve in Israel is demonstrative.
The “harvest” of 1,404 people in January and 949 others in February, the equivalent of a full year of Covid mortality without a vaccine (the year 2020) sharply reduced the number of Israelis at risk, resulting in de facto probably a decrease in the apparent risk of mortality in the coming year, in this age group.
But along with this decrease in its original target, the virus has mutated to attack other segments of society and especially younger age groups.
In November 2020, data from the Israeli Ministry of Health revealed that Israel had detected 400 cases of the coronavirus in children under the age of two. In February 2021, that number increased to 5,800.
The same “harvesting ” has been observed in Great Britain. As the Covid19 threatens only a small part of the population (the elderly with comorbidity), the peri-vaccination disappearance of a large part of this population (as much as the deaths of the year 2020) at risk, mathematically reduces mortality observed, at least transiently.
Since the British vaccination campaign, the average mortality per million inhabitants in Great Britain (934 / M) is more than double that of the Netherlands (411 / M).
The natural regression of the epidemic Also explains the drop in mortality as shown in the comparison between the highly vaccinated Great Britain and the very poorly vaccinated Netherlands
The mortality curves per million inhabitants follow the same temporality in these two neighboring countries. That of the United Kingdom suffers from a much higher peri-vaccination peak, the current mortality in the Netherlands is slightly higher reflecting the absence of the English “harvest”.
The current vaccination, accelerator of the epidemic and mortality?
The review of the main countries which have adopted broad vaccination shows that in real populations, generalized vaccination behaves more as an accelerator of the epidemic and of mortality than as a prevention thereof. [5]
In all highly vaccinated countries, the mortality recorded during the two months after vaccination is equal to or exceeds that of the whole of 2020.
LACK OF SOLID EXPERIMENTAL DATA The tests of these vaccines were insufficient, without hindsight, because they are in progress. The first results are promised for early 2023.
None of them pointed out the possibility of a possible increase in contamination and mortality, which fortunately appear to be transitory. They are not very informative on the more or less serious side effects, such as the frequency of early vascular accidents in the days following vaccination, or the multiplication of miscarriages and menstrual disorders in women for example and of course the possible more complications. late in the medium and long term.
The race for accelerated vaccination at all costs could ultimately be ineffective for popular confidence in all vaccinations. There’s no point in running, you have to start on time, La Fontaine would have said. But new billionaires like the CEO of Moderna probably don’t think like the turtle in the Fable who has already amassed a fortune.
THE FUTURE IS EARLY TREATMENTS MASTERED BY FIELD PHYSICIANS Transparent studies are essential to understand the mechanism of these transient worsening of the epidemic after vaccination and to deduce possible preventive measures, if a new outbreak occurs.
Especially since the future, after this vaccine hecatomb, remains very uncertain. The leaders who have violated the bases of medicine and democracy by imposing express vaccination without respecting the usual procedures for the safety and effectiveness of drugs placed on the market, all find themselves promising their populations early treatment for future waves, thus proving, like Boris Johnson, that they no longer believe in the vaccination they have imposed. [6]
MEDICINE SHOULD NOT BE DECIDED BY POLICY Health policy should no longer be imposed or guided by often inaccurate simulations (and their displays sometimes influenced by policies as English scientists admit), but should be based on respect for democracy and clinical experience. field physicians possibly guided by simple non-binding recommendations.
All data must be transparent like the figures of the Sentinels Network which reflects the number of real patients, consulting doctors for clinical signs. Much more reliable than the perennial contamination figures based on unreliable PCR tests.
FREEDOM TO CARE AND BE CAREFUL Surtout les médecins doivent être autorisés à traiter librement leurs patients avec tous les moyens à leur disposition sans diktat bureaucratique, et ce dès le début de la maladie, comme dans toute autre pathologie. Dès le début de l’épidémie, les traitements précoces basés sur les antibiotiques, macrolides, l’hydroxychloroquine, l’Artemisia, les vitamines D et C et le zinc, puis l’ivermectine étaient connus et diabolisés par les médecins de plateau au service de nouvelles drogues hors de prix comme le remdésivir, et surtout des futurs vaccins.
The political choice to prohibit the free choice of treatment by the authorities has led in several countries of the world, including France, to numerous deaths, at least part of which was preventable. The ongoing trials will give voice to the families of the victims without repairing the irreparable loss of a loved one.
ESSENTIAL MORATORIUM Totalitarianism, systematic censorship and persecution of opponents and the suppression of fundamental freedoms in science, medicine and economics only lead to more or less long-term catastrophes, including for those responsible for them.
It is high time to go back to the proven facts and to their critical examination without a priori. In all countries, experimental vaccinations were followed by an increase in contamination and mortality attributed to Covid19 and the appearance of mutants. As long as the phenomenon has not been elucidated, a moratorium on anticovid vaccinations is essential and urgent.
Dr Gérard Delépine, cross-posted from Global Research.
Notes:
[1] Great Britain: actual results of the anti-Covid-19 vaccination as of March 29 – (ripostelaique.com) [ ↩]
[2] Analysis of the results of the anti-Covid19 vaccination in Israel as of February 23, 2021 – Nouveau Monde (nouveau-monde.ca) [ ↩]
[3] https://nouveau-monde.ca/et-surgit-une-hecatombe-post-vaccinale/ [ ↩]
[4] A Pyrrhic victory is a tactical victory, achieved at the cost of losses so heavy to the winner that they compromise his chances of final victory. [ ↩]
[5] F Gobert Since we were vaccinated (anticovid), the average daily mortality has increased in 13 countries out of 14 Agoravox https://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/sante/article/depuis-qu-on-vaccine- anticovid-la-233252 [ ↩]
[6] https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/boris-johnson-veut-un-traitement-precoce-contre-la-covid-dici-lautomne [ ↩]
They're not "anti-vaxxers", they're opposed to forced experimentation on human beings as was specifically addressed in the Nuremberg Code in 1947 after the Nazis decided to commit atrocities on those they considered less than human.
My conclusion?
From Top to Bottom, they all lied about the stats from the beginning and at ever stage since then. Even after they new they had problems, they simply lied more.
I never believed their published stats. I don’t believe anything from the Media, the Experts or from the Fed Gov.
I opted out, will not participate.
Which of those disciplines best qualifies the doctor to opine on vaccines and infectious diseases? Or are all those doctor thingies alike?
One doesn’t need to be a genius to avoid going to an orthopedic surgeon for infectious disease and vaccine advice.
“ Which of those disciplines best qualifies the doctor to opine on vaccines and infectious diseases? Or are all those doctor thingies alike?”
Well, post your credentials here and we can judge if you are a credible source.
Be sure to list your publications.
I’m not relying on my credentials, I’m relying on my observation about the flaws in his analysis.
Likewise, I didn’t start out criticizing his piece based on his credentials but on his choosing unrealistic dates for when populations got vaccinated.
Do you have something to say about my critique?
Internet doctors with Credentials? LOL!
Well, fair enough, but without your credentials we know nothing about the value of your "observation.
Not sure you’ve thought this line of argument through. If credentials determine correctness Fauci’s immaculate.
It’s trivially easy to find strong vaccine supporters with better qualifications than Dr. Delepine.
If you’re not comfortable using your own reasoning powers to evaluate these claims, fine, but blindly trusting the person with the longest resume may not serve you well.
It is never size, it is expertise.
The man is trained in 2 medical areas, has had a very long and successful practice with real patients, has an expertise in statistical analysis, and is widely published.
I consider all of those areas to add expertise and credibility to this doctor.
Why do you say that? Moderna claims the same basic thing in their filings with the SEC. They said it was considered gene therapy.
“ Not sure you’ve thought this line of argument through. If credentials determine correctness Fauci’s immaculate.”
Fauci has been nothing but a bureaucrat for decades. He also funded gain of function research which likely caused this in the first place. Not too wise to use him as an example.
Take the jab if you want but don’t get all pissy when others point out things that go against the narrative you and CNN have found yourselves in the same side of,
You’ll be very hard pressed to find someone with better credentials to deal with a viral pandemic. Like him or not, that’s just a fact.
It was the FReeper I was talking to who was touting the importance of credentials, not me. Maybe take it up with them?
“ You’ll be very hard pressed to find someone with better credentials to deal with a viral pandemic. Like him or not, that’s just a fact.
Despite his credentials, he has performed terribly.
The man is corrupt and compromised and funded the lab that unleashed the pandemic.
So incredibly embarrassing. Do you actually believe this nonsense?
Because there is no “gene editing” involved. If Moderna actually said that, they are taking liberties with the term. A vaccine is not a ‘therapy’. A therapy is what you give to a person already suffering from a disease to treat that disease. A vaccine is to prevent the occurrence of a disease. By definition it cannot be therapy and certainly not ‘gene therapy’.
Which reminds me, I still need to answer your question on the definition of a vaccine. I haven’t forgotten, just kept putting it off. I will get to it at some point.
They changed the definition of vaccine to include these gene therapy things during the pandemic. If you try to provide proof, make sure you go back in time as words matter, and changing definitions don’t count.
They (Moderna) indeed said it was considered gene therapy. I suspect they know more about the products they developed than you do. I also don’t think they would be sloppy with their words in an SEC filing.
You do know that none of the “vaccines” actually PREVENT the disease, right? That’s not news to anyone so I assume you know that. Knowing that makes your point about a vaccine being to prevent the occurrence of a disease moot. None of them do that. They are supposed to lower your reaction to it. You know, like a therapy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.