[E. Pluribus Unum]

"The decision to not hear the case suggests that the Supreme Court justices have little appetite for election-related cases."

[butlerweave]

California has a Voting Process ?

[blackdog]

After 35 years in my line of work I still don’t get to pick and choose my tasks.

[Bullish]

...little appetite for election-related cases.

And no appetite for a Constitutional govt either it seems.

[Petrosius]

Correct decision. Constitutionally the states can pick their electors any way they choose.

[qaz123]

And that is a good thing. All these new laws getting signed, even though some seem to not have any of the teeth that we’d all love them to have, the Lefties have no where to go.

State matter = State Court.

Does that mean that the system is perfect? Nope. But, at least it’ll keep them on the home team field and not have a case from Georgia end up in the 9th Circuit. Hopefully.

[pfflier]

This is not exactly a benchmark barnburner in election law.

I believe each state can determine their electoral college apportionment, including winner take all, which has and is, a tradition for most.

[qaz123]

One thing I’d be interested in seeing is if states enacted a “electoral college” type thing. I doubt there would too many states with Democrat Governors. Sizable portions of states we all consider BLUE have very large Republican populations. Outside of Cali and some of the New England states, most of them have Republican controlled legislatures. Be real interesting if the the Governors in Michigan, Pennsylvania, NY, Louisiana, Kentucky, Nevada didn’t rely on the fraud and last minute ballot stuffing from the inner city votes and the heavy Dem areas.

Then again, even in some of them, if they didn’t allow any of the results to be tabulated that day, sealed all the ballot boxes and started counting the next day, the Dem’s wouldn’t be able to stuff the boxes at the last minute to squeak out their wins.

[AndyJackson]

California “does not treat any voter or group of voters differently from any other or prevent anyone from casting a vote.”

Neither did the Soviet Union.

[Republican Wildcat]

"The decision to not hear the case suggests that the Supreme Court justices have little appetite for election-related cases."

Possibly - but it was also a rather ridiculous and meritless case.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

The separate sovereign states control how their electoral votes will be, which is precisely how the founders set it up. The sovereign states are the fundmental building blocks of the nation.

It is not a “winner take all” state vote system that is the problem. It is the electorates of the commie liberal states that is the problem.

If every state apportioned votes by the ratios won in each state, you would basically have nothing more than a popular vote.