Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happens if the Election Audits Go Trump's Way?
American Thinker ^ | Jun 13, 2021 | Clarice Feldman

Posted on 06/13/2021 7:53:37 AM PDT by upchuck

What will the military, the Supreme Court, and the people eventually do?  How will the military, the Supreme Court, and the masses react to the outcome?  How will the military move, how will the Supreme Court rule, and eventually do the masses rise up and take to the streets...if it becomes clear that the presidential election of 2020 was compromised, was stolen, or at the very least had way too many abnormalities and illegalities and thus the wrong person is possibly sitting in the White House?  What happens if it becomes clear that President Trump was re-elected and the Progressives actually stole the election?  What happens if we find out that the election was manipulated?  What happens if?

We might find out these answers in the coming months.  Maybe.  What about the forensic audits of the popular votes in the contested key states?

Before the actual election in November, President Trump predicted cheating as you've never seen before.  President Trump said there would be voter fraud like never before in U.S. history.  Many people throughout the White House believed and were certain that something felonious was about to happen.  At 10:30 on Election Night, President Trump was up by good margins in the key states.  Then the key states shut down the election tabulations of votes "for the night."  (By the way, the stopping of counting votes for the night had never happened before in presidential history.)  And then when we woke up in the morning, after the tallying of votes was supposedly shut down "for the night," Joe Biden had pulled ahead, stayed ahead, and assumed the White House.  As of this writing, Biden has 306 Electoral College votes, and President Trump has 232 votes.  Two hundred seventy votes is the magic number to win the presidency.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lolcow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-216 next last
To: Chickensoup

I wonder how much old joe kennedy paid Nixon


121 posted on 06/13/2021 10:09:22 AM PDT by JVahey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Only this is not by Clarice Feldman, as the link says the author is: Andrew W. Coy


122 posted on 06/13/2021 10:21:22 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Wrong, your little ignorisae doesn’t understand how it works.

A grant of Quo Warranto removes the wrongful officeholders and orders the rightful officeholders to be sworn in.


123 posted on 06/13/2021 10:22:54 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Trump will be reinstated. There is no other remedy. He won and he’s the President. End of story.


124 posted on 06/13/2021 10:25:45 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“nothing....JFK stole the election from Nixon in 1960....”

That’s true. Everyone knew it. JFK bragged about it. But Trump isn’t Nixon. This will be different.


125 posted on 06/13/2021 10:25:50 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Faith, not fear. Faith, not faintheartedness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Read the history. JFK got a winning number of ECs the same way Biden did, i.e., via cheating in Daly’s Chicago. Ghost and dead voters turned out, and old Joe paid well. JFK bragged and laughed about it. Joe asked Jack, “You didn’t think I was going to buy you a landslide, did you?”


126 posted on 06/13/2021 10:29:54 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Faith, not fear. Faith, not faintheartedness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

The evidence presented MUST be incontrovertible — to keep the press from lying about it.

I am extremely interested in seeing an analysis of the ballot markings, in particular whether or not they were printed or copied on a machine.

That would be a tough one for the press to spin.


127 posted on 06/13/2021 10:32:34 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

The Constitution says Obama and Harris are ineligible.

The Constitution ceased to have relevance on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 when ALL of our elected and appointed abrogated it by swearing in a British subject/Kenyan/Indonesian.


128 posted on 06/13/2021 10:33:25 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

For that to work we would need an honest Supreme Court.

We don’t have one.


129 posted on 06/13/2021 10:34:52 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Nothing will happen. Absolutely nothing.


130 posted on 06/13/2021 10:36:11 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (THE BEST IS YET TO COME - (PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jvette; Dead Corpse

Let me know when you two start killing people.


131 posted on 06/13/2021 10:37:24 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The Constitution says Obama and Harris are ineligible. The Constitution ceased to have relevance on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 when ALL of our elected and appointed abrogated it by swearing in a British subject/Kenyan/Indonesian.

I made no argument about the likelihood that the courts would have the courage to decide appropriately.

132 posted on 06/13/2021 10:37:46 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
A grant of Quo Warranto removes the wrongful officeholders and orders the rightful officeholders to be sworn in.

Your have a vivd imagination, I'll give you that.

133 posted on 06/13/2021 10:42:31 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

To say there is no way to remedy a stolen election is nonsense. As Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, governments can be overthrown when they become lawless tyrannies.

The U.S. Constitution is no sacred license to allow massive election fraud. Fraud negates what would otherwise be lawful.

If the USA cannot continue as a single country because of wicked liars and cheaters sidestepping honest elections, trying to impose their evil on others, that is nothing new in history.

The U.S. Constitution does not require the righteous to meet evil half way. Half way to evil is still evil.

Those of you satisfied with no solution to massive election fraud had better find a bunker.

If a stolen election must be condoned, where would there be any future “line in the sand?” Why would these wicked people stop there?

Look at what these criminals have done to this country in just four months of this year.

Can the round up of the righteous be far behind? Look for cattle cars full of good people heading for the camps.

A civil war over an obviously stolen election is a real possibility.


134 posted on 06/13/2021 10:44:41 AM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
A grant of Quo Warranto removes the wrongful officeholders and orders the rightful officeholders to be sworn in.

Yes, about a grant of Quo Warranto being used. But I would think that the grant would return the new results back to the state legislatures where they would have a chance to re-certify.

135 posted on 06/13/2021 10:44:50 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative; All
All that will happen is we will have the “proof” of the massive Election Fraud that the Leftists say does not exist.
Of course they will deny it is proof, but it may open a few eyes for those who have been on the fence about this.


There is quite a bit of proof that the election was stolen. Mike Lindell has done a great job of showing the statistical evidence. The best evidence of how deep the conspiracy is is probably inadmissible evidence in a civil court. The NSA may have warrantless wiretaps, either that they conducted, or that were conducted by a foreign intelligence agency like the Israelis, and forwarded to the NSA. The Insurrection Act would apply in this case. There is some speculation that Trump actually invoked it secretly. I hope he did.
136 posted on 06/13/2021 10:52:35 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

These types of articles are ridiculous.

Even if by some miracle all of the audits go Trump’s way and the media reports it as such and the public believes and accepts it, the only mechanism would be impeachment to remove a sitting administration (if they do not resign). Biden was still elected by the Electoral College.

That would make Nancy Pelosi President...even if we assume the House would impeach and the Senate would convict both Biden and Harris if they did not resign.


137 posted on 06/13/2021 10:53:14 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
But I would think that the grant would return the new results back to the state legislatures where they would have a chance to re-certify.

If an office holder is removed through a writ of quo warranto then the office is vacant and is filled in the manner the law requires. In the case of the presidency it would be Harris as president. And if she were removed then Pelosi would be president. Nothing in law allows the losing candidate to be appointed as a replacement.

138 posted on 06/13/2021 10:54:29 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No standing.


139 posted on 06/13/2021 10:55:33 AM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
But I would think that the grant would return the new results back to the state legislatures where they would have a chance to re-certify.

Agree...I don't see how the states could be left out of it...In fact, I think the writ would apply to the Electors. They were the ones directly elected by fraud.

140 posted on 06/13/2021 10:56:12 AM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson