There are many medication protocols which are effective in cutting death by 85% in high risk patients (elderly, comorbidities etc.)
Posted on 06/12/2021 4:55:30 PM PDT by BeauBo
(President Trump's Operation Warp Speed Update)
(The pace of vaccination picked back up on this report - New Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths may be levelling off at a new lower plateau - the more transmissible Indian "Delta" variant is now established in the USA, accounting for about 4% of new US cases, but already the majority of new cases in the UK)
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 374,397,205 (21,396,900 J&J)
Administered: 308,112,728 (11,457,011 J&J)
People Vaccinated, At Least One Dose: 173,391,711
Fully Vaccinated: 143,119,077
(Excerpt) Read more at covid.cdc.gov ...
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 983,000 (OK) (100 J&J)
Administered: 1.6 Million (Strong) (73,000 J&J - Very Weak)
People Vaccinated, First Shot: 634,000 - (OK, back up like the week prior).
Fully Vaccinated: One Million (Strong)
% Total Population with at least a First Shot: 52.2 (up 0.2)
Those ≥ 18 Years of Age (Adults): 64.3% (up 0.2)
Those ≥ 65 Years of Age: 86.7 % (up 0.1) (76.1% Fully Vaccinated - up 0.2)
Cases and Deaths seem to have begun levelling off, at a much lower level, Nationwide. New hospitalizations continue trending downward, but may have also begun slowing their decline/plateauing.
359 Deaths (flat)
Vaccinations jumped on this report, from the low levels of the last week, back up to what they were, when we were on track to meet the 4th of July goal (around 650K first shots per day). Not making up the lost ground, but not falling further behind.
The Indian "Delta" variant (B.1.526) is now established in the USA, accounting for about 4% of new cases. It is the fastest spreading of the variants of concern, about 40% more transmissible than the original strain. It is already the dominant strain in the UK.
Seems we may have some additional States reporting weekly rather than daily?
The chart below shows reports of death from 1990 to the present. Guess why the line goes vertical at the end of 2020 and into 2021?
There are many medication protocols which are effective in cutting death by 85% in high risk patients (elderly, comorbidities etc.)
Safe, effective medications have been available all along.
Early Treatment Protocols (Collection of Covid-19 resources, treatment and prophylactic protocols)
As information of breakthrough cases of Covid keep slipping past the gatekeepers, the public will realize medication protocols are more effective than repeated injections with dangerous experimental 'products' which have never been used on the public before.PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL”
BitChute ^ | May 28, 2021 | Jim Meehan, M.D
COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]
If these are Friday’s numbers, people are probably scheduling the shots so they won’t miss work if they have a reaction.
Lot of vaccinees infected with Delta at Canadian hospital.
Mild cases, one ICU- don’t know if vaccinated.
https://globalnews.ca/news/7943610/calgary-foothills-hospital-covid-19-delta-outbreak-vaccinations/
This is fine. /s
That’s a good point.
Or making out their will. Just in case.
>>Note the latest June 11 updates include almost 6000 reports of deaths after Covid ‘vaccinations’ and the CDC is withholding from publishing most of the reports it receives. There’s also paralysis, cerebrothrombo accidents, strokes, blood clots, neurological damage, anaphylaxis and others which defy description.<<
Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Similar to the media conflation of “from COVID” and “with COVID” when describing deaths.
6,000 deaths out of 170 million people is 6/170,000. Not quite lightening strike (1/500,000) but up there. By comparison your probability of getting killed in a car crash is around 1/100.
It is perfectly OK to be skeptical, even distrustful, of the COVID vaccine.
But it is NOT a Conservative value to be like the msm and torture facts and logic to make a political point.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Similar to the media conflation of “from COVID” and “with COVID” when describing deaths.
6,000 deaths out of 170 million people is 6/170,000. Not quite lightening strike (1/500,000) but up there. By comparison your probability of getting killed in a car crash is around 1/100.
It is perfectly OK to be skeptical, even distrustful, of the COVID vaccine.
But it is NOT a Conservative value to be like the msm and torture facts and logic to make a political point.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pompus misdirection on your part is not a sign of me torturing facts and logic.
I say it over and over (CDC is withholding records) and people just keep quoting the 6000 reports as if that is all there are.
There are many, many more records. about half of all reports published to VAERS for Covid-19 'vaccines' are from the first 7 weeks of 'vaccine' administration, at that time only 36 million doses had been shot into people.
So, how can half of all reports in VAERS cover 36 million doses and the other half cover another 260 million doses? The CDC is not publishing most of the records it receives, and it appears to be selecting which records it wants to publish.
A recent update was indeed ominous - it showed that most of the records were appended to December and January, again, this driving the death rate up for specific weeks. That meant initial estimates for records published plus records not published which was around 14,400, were far too low.
Even if we knew how many records the CDC had, and how many reports of deaths were among them, we'd need to multiply by at least 100 to get an idea how many adverse events 'really' occurred because only 1% of adverse events are ever reported to the CDC.
Also - the chart shows that Covid-19 reports containing deaths are increasing dramatically and already dwarf those of any other vaccine in VAERS 30 year history.
Something is HORRIBLY wrong with Covid-19 vaccines. It's not just deaths. Dramatic destruction of quality of life (inability to work, having to learn to walk again, constant siezures, worsening neurologic diseases and more) are reported in unacceptably large numbers yet there are some on FR that keep waving their arms shouting 'Nothing to see here" or chiding those who post vax data for 'torturing logic.'
>>Something is HORRIBLY wrong with Covid-19 vaccines. It’s not just deaths. Dramatic destruction of quality of life (inability to work, having to learn to walk again, constant siezures, worsening neurologic diseases and more) are reported in unacceptably large numbers yet there are some on FR that keep waving their arms shouting ‘Nothing to see here” or chiding those who post vax data for ‘torturing logic.’<<
Rather than strengthen your position, you have weakened it. There can be only two possible scenarios:
1) The data are so faulty as to be useless (which is what your post says). Thus, there is nothing to talk about as you have no facts (since there are no facts) to back up your position and it is all conjecture.
2) The data are accurate and therefore you have no facts to back up your position and it is all conjecture.
That is the entire argumentation universe. Choose one.
OMG! We have to shut everything down now!/s
God help us if something like a real killer disease, such as the black death, gets loose.
~~~~~~~~~~~
This is how they cover up 'vaccine breakthrough'. The constant introduction of 'variants' into discussion are meant to absorb the blame for breakthrough infections or the more serious ADE, a side effect noted in viral vaccinations through the failed history of attempts to develop them.
With ADE, people are overly sensitized to a pathogen so that when exposed, they over react and become more severely ill than they would have become if not vaccinated. This can cause cytokine storm and death. But initial ADE (sensitization) can look like Covid-19.
Nobody has been “vaccinated” against Covid 19.
They have been injected with a bioweapon.
I actually hope that Trump will work to pull his brand from this.
Warp Speed was to develop and produce a “vaccine”.
That job is done, and, frankly, whatever you think of the vaccine, its developer is becoming implicated in the release of the virus, itself.
The entire project is turning to programs of inoculation that I don’t think Trump had anything to do with, anyway.
This whole thing stinks to high heaven, and Trump had better stick to taking credit for good work done when it was good.
Just my opinion.
>>Something is HORRIBLY wrong with Covid-19 vaccines. It’s not just deaths. Dramatic destruction of quality of life (inability to work, having to learn to walk again, constant siezures, worsening neurologic diseases and more) are reported in unacceptably large numbers yet there are some on FR that keep waving their arms shouting ‘Nothing to see here” or chiding those who post vax data for ‘torturing logic.’<<
Rather than strengthen your position, you have weakened it. There can be only two possible scenarios:
1) The data are so faulty as to be useless (which is what your post says). Thus, there is nothing to talk about as you have no facts (since there are no facts) to back up your position and it is all conjecture.
2) The data are accurate and therefore you have no facts to back up your position and it is all conjecture.
That is the entire argumentation universe. Choose one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No, I have not weakened my position. I have demonstrated the basis by which we can estimate that the true number are far, far greater than 6000.
Your reasoning is flawed so I will not choose from your flawed sub selection.
The purpose of the CDC’s VAERS is to detect signals or patterns. Not all data has to be present to detect unacceptably high numbers of deaths, myocarditis, paralysis, strokes etc. reported post Covid “vaccines”.
The CDC’s intentionally undercounting negative effects has been demonstrated by highly qualified analysts looking at the data they have released. We can choose to ignore the fact that the public trust and safety is being violated and abused, or we can use statistical analyses to try to get an idea how many deaths are occurring.
Harvard researched reporting - it determined 1% of real events are reported to CDC. We can ignore that and scream “nothing to see here” or we can grasp whatever scraps of information out of the hands of our abusers and share it.
I am curious, why would you look at a graph showing an average of 200 - 300 annual deaths or less for the past 30 years shooting up to 6000 reports of death in the past 6 months and, even if you choose to pretend my statements about undercounting don’t exist, decide a 20 to 30 times increase in reports of death signal all is well or that nothing can be gleaned from that information?
This is probably about where we will stay. Smoldering disease from unvaccinated and a few cases from vaccinated. It will not go back to where it was.
It’s everyone’s choice but a virus will do what a virus will do. They are impressive things.
No evidence the vaccine has spun down the SARS cases & fatalities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.