Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2021 9:18:02 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski

So lady’s will show signs of breast cancer and men will show signs of prostate cancer. While they may be “false” highs, what is the vaccine doing to create conditions similar to those of cancer?

Meanwhile we are testing this on 5-11 year olds. 5-11 year olds….


2 posted on 06/12/2021 9:23:10 AM PDT by walkingdead (We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Because the vaccines contain new instructions for your cells to produce a spike protein that is located on the virus. This induces your cells to make that protein which your body then is supposed to react to by producing antibodies. This can induce the body to do unexpected and unwanted things, like attacking itself, similar to arthritis. This protein produced by our own cells can also cause anaphylactic shock. This technology has had numerous failures and the idea we are using this mostly failed technology on millions of people is insane.


3 posted on 06/12/2021 9:23:55 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

My recent PSA readings during my 6-month check-up ran “0.15”. I don’t have a thing to worry about, post inoculation.


5 posted on 06/12/2021 9:29:57 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

If you got vaxxxxed get a blood test for Vit D level
Reports of very very low levels after vaxxx
Apparently does a job on your natural immunity


9 posted on 06/12/2021 9:51:42 AM PDT by silverleaf (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

There are some statements in the piece that readers should think twice about… particularly guys that are of the age where the issues of PSA tests and prostate cancer frequently come up when talking to doctors.

1. “It’s Dr. Diego Rubinowicz who said, in a report by CBS12, that it is the PSA levels for men who are being tested, often routinely, for prostate cancer, that are affected. The report explained prostate cancer is a common cancer for men, with a quarter of a million cases or thereabouts diagnosed in 2021.”
2. “But the doctor said he’s been seeing elevated PSA test levels in men who got vaccinations, not necessarily related to cancer, which the high numbers typically signify.”

The first quote above carries with it the insinuation that PSA tests can be used to detect prostate cancer. The second quote is a bit more cagey in that it suggests the PSA numbers may indicate something else...

Medical ideas have incredible inertia and it’s very difficult to change course once an idea is ‘out there’. The PSA test and it’s supposed connection to prostate cancer is a prime example of this. Men all around the planet have had prostates yanked as a result of ‘elevated levels’ even though there has been an axiom about this for years that basically says… “All men will die with prostate cancer…. Very few will die because of it.”

Here’s some history about this issue.... Dr. Thomas Stamey, MD was the medical research who wrote and published the first paper in 1987 that suggested that the diagnostic test for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a very good marker that indicated the presence of cancer. As a result, PSA tests have been routinely conducted once men get to a particular age.

Here is what is less well known…. In 2002, Dr. Stamey wrote another paper (published in the Journal of Urology in 2002 and 2004) that essentially refuted the conclusions of his 1987 paper. Basically what he said in 2002 was that after studying the issue for another 15 years, he has concluded that the PSA test was important and useful…. but it was useless for detecting cancer. What his further research found was that if the test was done and there were elevated PSA levels (between 2 and 10 ng/ml), that indicated a condition called benign prostatic hyperplasia….. a harmless increase in prostate size.

There are plenty of documents that can be found that discusses the Dr. Stamey and the PSA test…. It is touched on in this piece that was a notification of Dr. Stamey’s passing in 2015…. https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/09/thomas-stamey-expert-on-prostate-cancer-and-psa-test-dies-at-87.html


16 posted on 06/12/2021 10:34:54 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

So the PSA test isn’t so “prostate-specific” after all.

How many guys have gone through radiation “thanks” to false positives?


24 posted on 06/12/2021 1:01:16 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson