Posted on 06/11/2021 12:21:09 PM PDT by Red Badger
FINALLY! The lawsuit we’ve all been waiting for! An exhaustively researched, very tightly reasoned, and persuasively pled complaint condemning the Government’s COVID-19 response was filed today in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to hold the minute martinet, Anthony “Fluttering Fastball” Fauci and his co-conspirators at DHHS, CDC, NIH, and FDA accountable for their reign of terror over America.
Forty three named and unnamed plaintiffs led by America’s Frontline Doctors have sued Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Xavier Becerra, both personally and in his official capacity, Director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony Fauci, both personally and in his official capacity, Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Dr. Janet Woodcock, both personally and in her official capacity, DHHS itself, FDA itself, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), NIAID itself, and John and Jane Does I-V.
The theory of the case is that the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis,” enabling vaccine manufacturers to “reap billions of dollars in profit by exploiting the fears of the American people.” The complaint further alleges that the vaccines “have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 disease” themselves.
Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The Complaint alleges that the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) under which various “unapproved, inadequately tested, experimental, and dangerous” COVID-19 vaccines have been sold and administered are unlawful on multiple grounds and must be terminated immediately. The multiple grounds supporting termination of the EUAs, and by extension, administration of all COVID-19 vaccines, follows.
First, the Complaint alleges that the Emergency Declaration upon which the EUAs are all based was unjustified. Second, that the DHHS Secretary has failed to satisfy the “criteria for issuance” of the EUAs set forth in Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c). Third, that the DHHS Secretary has failed to satisfy the “conditions of authorization” mandated by § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A). If the District Court finds any of these grounds to be legally sustainable, the EUAs must as a matter of law be terminated.
Plaintiffs Seek Multiple Rulings and Damages From Individual Defendants The Plaintiffs are asking the District Court to review whether there was a true “public health emergency” and to find that, since there was no such actual emergency, that DHHS did not have the authority to declare such an emergency, which would likewise nullify the EUAs.
the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis”
The Plaintiffs are also asking the District Court to determine that the EUAs and extensions thereof are unlawful based on the grounds set forth above, that the Defendants have violated customary international law by engaging in non-consensual human medical experimentation, and that they have unlawfully failed to implement protections for human subjects in medical experimentation.
They are further asking the District Court to enjoin the enforcement of the overall “public health emergency” declaration and renewals, enforcement of the EUAs, and extension of the EUAs to children under the age of 16.
Finally, the Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The case is Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00702-CLM. A copy of the complaint follows.
Americas-Frontline-Doctors-v.-Becarra-COMPLAINT-1-FILED
https://magainstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Americas-Frontline-Doctors-v.-Becarra-COMPLAINT-1-FILED.pdf
it’s called sarcasm... but thank you for playing
Should be class action on behalf of the “American People” against “Fauci, et al”!
Yet being sarcastic about standing would imply that standing requirement shouldn’t exist.
Thanks for playing.
don’t understand me so fast, no, it does not.
where on earth or in space did you ever get that impression?
that’s your interpenetration of my words, not what i said
a: unless the military coup and executions are real,
there will NEVER be free, fair elections again.
b: congress already did something. sedition, treason,
antipathy to their voters, and the GOP help the
CCP to remove a fraction of native US voters by bioweapon.
Can this court case end in Fauci’s execution for mass murder?
It's a civil suit, not a criminal charge.
I no longer believe in the tooth fairy and I do not expect that our government, including the Judiciary, can or will deliver us from the utter corruption of their undertakings.
“Can this court case end in Fauci’s execution for mass murder?”
BTW. “Hitler’s doctor”. Dr. Karl Brandt was hung, not because he directly killed anyone. Brandt was convicted solely for his role of oversight of human medical experiments conducted without Informed Consent of the human subjects.
These “injections” are highly experimental and the public has been misled to believe that they are “approved”.
So, there is a precedent.
https://humansarefree.com/2021/05/who-trials-crimes-against-humanity.html
Which one of the three requirements to establish legal standing would you change?
The lawsuit I am waiting for is the one I think Janice Dean will file.
That lady takes no prisoners.
I suspect she has had more to do with making the public aware of Como;s evil actions than any other single individual.
How many Thousands of People DIED in the US because of Google, Twitter and Facebook making FALSE CLAIMS about Proven Treatments for the Fauci Flu?? Where is that Lawsuit!?
Law suit against Fauci PING!
So no true conservative should believe that the party suing must have suffered real, identifiable damage or will suffer real identifiable damage if the action they are suing over is allowed to continue? No true conservative believes that the party being sued must the party who caused that damage? No real conservative believes that the court must be able to redress the damage caused through their ruling? That's what true conservatives should believe?
Take Fauci’s passport away before he flees to China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.