Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arkansas woman suing police after PIT maneuver flips her car going 60 mph while she was pregnant
FoxNews ^ | 06/10/2021 | Paul Best

Posted on 06/10/2021 5:26:05 AM PDT by ScubaDiver

Nicole Harper says the PIT maneuver 'placed her life and the life of her unborn child at risk'

An Arkansas woman is suing an Arkansas State Police officer who she says "negligently performed" a Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT) maneuver that resulted in her car flipping over on the highway at 60 miles per hour in July 2020.

Nicole Harper, who was pregnant at the time, was clocked going 84 mph in a 70 mph zone last summer, according to the lawsuit. Within seconds of Arkansas State Police Officer Rodney Dunn turning on his patrol cruiser's overhead lights, Harper pulled over to the right lane, turned on her emergency blinkers, and slowed to 60 mph.

She was "unable to safely stop her vehicle on the right or left shoulder due to concrete barriers and a reduced shoulder being on both sides of the road… leaving [her] with no room to safely pull over her car," the lawsuit states.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; misconduct; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
She was following, to the letter, the instruction from the state of Arkansas...

Harper also contests that she did exactly what she learned to do in driver's education when being stopped by a police officer.

"Pull over to the right side of the road – activate your turn signal or emergency flashers to indicate to the officer that you are seeking a safe place to stop," the Arkansas Driver License Study Guide reads.

Sometimes, police and the departments that employ them are their own worst enemy. They never seem to miss an opportunity to demonstrate they're government employees. According to reports, this imbecile is still on the job.

1 posted on 06/10/2021 5:26:05 AM PDT by ScubaDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver
She was "unable to safely stop her vehicle on the right or left shoulder due to concrete barriers and a reduced shoulder being on both sides of the road… leaving [her] with no room to safely pull over her car," the lawsuit states.

If a cop decides he wants me to pull over, on a road with no shoulder, then I will move over as much as I can, and stop in the traffic lane. It will have been HIS decision to want me to stop there.

2 posted on 06/10/2021 5:29:52 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver

I doubt that the cop knew she was pregnant, so that shouldn’t be the issue.


3 posted on 06/10/2021 5:31:19 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Whatever doesn’t kill you will make you stronger. Except bears. Bears will definitely kill you.h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver

There are two sides to every story. If there was no room to pull over due to concrete barriers, then there was no room for the cop to perform a PIT.


4 posted on 06/10/2021 5:32:40 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver
was clocked going 84 mph in a 70 mph zone

In my area, the interstates are marked as 55 mph, and the routine flow of traffic is 80 mph.

5 posted on 06/10/2021 5:34:15 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Well both sides of this story are on video. Clearly the woman wasn’t trying to flee. The cop was power tripping. And likely should find another line of work.


6 posted on 06/10/2021 5:36:05 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller
"I doubt that the cop knew she was pregnant, so that shouldn’t be the issue."

Really. It was her decision to speed...while pregnant.

7 posted on 06/10/2021 5:37:13 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver

Don’t speed.


8 posted on 06/10/2021 5:37:14 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver

I always thought the PIT was reserved for pursuits when the pursued vehicle is a danger to traffic or the public. They usually just chase until the perp makes a mistake or runs out of gas/stops from spike strips.

This seems like really extreme overreaction by the cop. Strange policy if they PIT after 30 seconds.


9 posted on 06/10/2021 5:39:47 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The left does not want dialogue; it wants compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Don’t speed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, good luck with that. Just keeping up with traffic so that one doesn’t get run over or have endless maneuvers being made close around one’s vehicle means by definition that one must speed.


10 posted on 06/10/2021 5:40:45 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh please. 84 in a 70? Guess he should have shot out her tires if the PIT maneuver didn’t work.

The cop was in the wrong. Period. I hope he gets whats coming to him.


11 posted on 06/10/2021 5:42:32 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

“I doubt that the cop knew she was pregnant, so that shouldn’t be the issue.”

It is an issue for influencing jury emotions and damages.


12 posted on 06/10/2021 5:43:24 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

yeah, I agree, this was an extreme over reaction by the police officer that put the woman and anyone else in the areas life in danger over basically nothing. This would be like spraying bullet into a crowd because someone jaywalked!


13 posted on 06/10/2021 5:45:35 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScubaDiver
Hardly any traffic. There is a brake down lane of sorts though narrow. Shouldn't be an issue though because she could have pulled over as far as she could and you know cops will leave their vehicle sticking out further because it protects them from getting run over as they stand at your window. However, she had just driven under a sign that said 1 mile to exit and he could have waited to see is she pulled off the exit. It's not like she was trying to outrun him. I find them both guilty of stupid.


14 posted on 06/10/2021 5:45:45 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

That is true.

But if you’re keeping up with traffic and not posing a hazard, then it’s not likely you’ll get pulled over either.

There has to be more to the story about why he pulled her over.


15 posted on 06/10/2021 5:47:01 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Having been trained in using the PIT any thing over 30mph is considered deadly force.

Using at 60 in this situation doesn’t on the face of the story seem proper.


16 posted on 06/10/2021 5:48:17 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

“Both guilty of stupid”? What did she do wrong exactly? She slowed down and put on her flashers. Any cop with an iota of common sense would know she wasn’t trying to flee. I likely would have done exactly what she did.


17 posted on 06/10/2021 5:48:47 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner

>>Having been trained in using the PIT any thing over 30mph is considered deadly force.<<

That is really interesting. Puts a different perspective on the story for sure.


18 posted on 06/10/2021 5:50:14 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The left does not want dialogue; it wants compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Don’t speed.

So the penalty for speeding, 10-15 mph over the speed limit and likely going with the flow of traffic, slowing down, moving the right lane, putting her blinker and hazard lights indicating that she acknowledged she was being pulled over but waiting to find a safe place to do so, that IYO justifies the cop ramming her from behind and flipping her car over? SMH

19 posted on 06/10/2021 5:51:06 AM PDT by MD Expat in PA (No. I am not a doctor nor have I ever played one on TV. The MD in my screen name stands for Maryland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: metmom
There has to be more to the story about why he pulled her over

The video I saw started with her passing him at that speed. I am guessing that is what set him off.

20 posted on 06/10/2021 5:54:05 AM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson