Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JPMorgan Cuts Off Donations to Republicans Who Objected to 2020 Election Results
The Western Journal ^ | June 5, 2021 at 2:29pm | Isa Cox

Posted on 06/06/2021 11:33:34 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The nation’s largest lender, JPMorgan Chase & Co., is set to resume political donations after pausing them in the wake of the Capitol incursion — but will maintain a freeze on donations to lawmakers who objected to the certification of the 2020 election.

Of course, like much of the narrative surrounding the Jan. 6 riot, this move is reliant upon the notion that objecting to the election is the same as barging into the Capitol in the middle of official proceedings with a motley crew of disgruntled voters and a far-left activist or two.

According to an internal memo obtained by Reuters, JPMorgan’s PAC will not donate to a “handful” of the 147 Republican lawmakers who voted to overturn the results of the 2020 election in January.

The pause will last through the 2022 midterm elections.

I have no memory of JPMorgan or anyone else ending donations to the many vocal and prominent lawmakers who told us for years that the 2016 election was illegitimate, do you?

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chase; jpmorgan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/06/2021 11:33:34 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The nation’s largest lender, JPMorgan Chase & Co., is set to resume political donations after pausing them in the wake of the Capitol incursion — but will maintain a freeze on donations to lawmakers who objected to the certification of the 2020 election.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

did I read somewhere that JPM is THE central bank for some ME country like syria or lebannon??


2 posted on 06/06/2021 11:40:15 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Discrimination suit should be filed.


3 posted on 06/06/2021 11:41:34 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

Sounds like election tampering.


4 posted on 06/06/2021 11:42:28 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Biology is science. Homemade pronouns are narcissism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

more threats based on what one believes or thinks


5 posted on 06/06/2021 11:43:42 AM PDT by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t remember anyone objecting to the electors, although some said they would.


6 posted on 06/06/2021 11:46:01 AM PDT by CottonBall (MAKE REPUBLICANS WHIGS AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

“Discrimination suit should be filed.”

Since donations are, by definition, donations, a discrimination suit is a stretch. I think the issue is, banks require all sorts of government approvals to operate. Bank of America, was, when I researched them during the Obama presidency, below the “stress” point where the government had closed other banks and divided up their assets to more stable banks. But, BOA was and is the Democratic party’s piggy bank. BOA will finance any Democratic venture. Also, BOA has blackballed all the Democratic party bugaboo’s, like arms manufacturers, dealers and anyone in the industry. That’s because, due to the many approvals required, the government owns the banks. Since Republicans never played this game, we never noticed the reverse being true, or BOA and other banks would have made a big show of banning loans to anything connected to the alphabet people or abortions. (Back in the day when the Republicans had a policy on those things.)


7 posted on 06/06/2021 11:49:06 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oops the truth just came out about how our political system and the Republican Party works.

The undies are down and the truth is on full display.

These people are hooked on leashes to big financial business interests like JP Morgan.

The ones losing donations will have to get their money from the little people now instead of the insider outfits or submit to their “Masters”.


8 posted on 06/06/2021 11:52:34 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODYS BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

so now their donations are Bribes


9 posted on 06/06/2021 12:05:33 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

So true.


10 posted on 06/06/2021 12:09:32 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well, my wife and I are determined to give to politicians who primary members who supported impeachment.


11 posted on 06/06/2021 12:20:09 PM PDT by sitetest (Professional patient; no longer mostly dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Correct, you can’t force someone to make a donation. However, a state (let’s say Florida and Texas) can sell all holdings of discriminatory banks (for example BoA and JP Morgan) and prohibit investment in these institutions by the state. If that doesn’t do the trick, strip them of their right to do business in the state.


12 posted on 06/06/2021 12:22:11 PM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good. Any politician that is accepted donations from liberal New York mage-corporations is suspect.


13 posted on 06/06/2021 12:24:35 PM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I’d rather vote for a politician that wasn’t a puppet of JP Morgan anyway.


14 posted on 06/06/2021 12:25:31 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Assange )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just so we all know who holds the leash


15 posted on 06/06/2021 12:30:19 PM PDT by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Last I heard CORPORATIONS are not permitted to donate to political candidates.

Might it be that J.P.Morgan Stanley Pierce Fenner and Finch is BREAKING THE LAW?


16 posted on 06/06/2021 12:35:43 PM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/jpmorgan-chase-co/C00104299/summary/2020

“PAC Summary Data, 2019-2020
Total Raised $1,130,590
Total Spent $998,780”

Shiver me timbers!


17 posted on 06/06/2021 12:37:12 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

this is actually good. it will show us who is in the banks’ pocket and who is not. cut-off away, jp morgan. the people don’t want your puppets in office anyways. A rep in office not beholden to you is exactly what we need.


18 posted on 06/06/2021 1:08:21 PM PDT by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I freaking HATE JPM!


19 posted on 06/06/2021 1:08:50 PM PDT by sauropod (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I believe I’ll return the favor and freeze my donations to Chase.


20 posted on 06/06/2021 1:10:11 PM PDT by McGavin999 (biden is not my president )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson