That's racist!
It’s racist to work for the NY Times.
The first one to bring up race is the racist.
But if it had emerged from Oslo, then it would be okay to say that.
He needs to download his narrative update.
The NYT is racist.
Assclowns have a way of opening their mouths and exposing themselves.
But somehow it's not racist to blame whites for all the plagues spread during the Little Ice Age in the then continental U.S. as well as everywhere else.
That's racist!
There is new evidence to show that China locked down all domestic traffic internally by end January 2020 but pushed to open foreign travel till end March.
Data from Tom Tom traffic index, a traffic location site that covers 416 cities across 57 countries show that as a result of this strategy, China, intentionally or otherwise, was able to lockdown its cities unknown to the world.
While this reduced the spread of the Corona virus within China, China’s aggressive foreign travel policy lead to a virus explosion worldwide. ...”
______________________________________
“In February [2020], after the U.S. imposed travel restrictions on China, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus publicly chastised countries for adopting the policy.”
Article: The World Health Organization Bows to China
Brett D. Schaefer, April 28, 2020
===================================================
Former Vice President Joe Biden now says he supports travel bans to contain the Chinese coronavirus after all – after he previously called the China travel ban issued by President Donald Trump in late January “xenophobia.”
Deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield told CNN on April 3 that Biden “supports travel bans that are guided by medical experts, advocated by public health officials and backed by a full strategy,” adding, “Science supported this ban, therefore he did too.”
Was that before or after looking at a poll that said Trump would do a better job dealing with this crisis than Biden?
Asking for the potentially hundreds of thousands of American lives President Trump saved by acting decisively in the early days of this pandemic at a time Biden was hysterically complaining about “reactionary” travel restrictions.
And why wasn’t Biden the first one explaining his new position on this issue? Why tell us now? And why pretend he was in favor of it all along when he never supported it at the time? Why not just admit he was wrong?
Biden not only didn’t support the ban, he explicitly opposed it, repeatedly saying it was unscientific, even though it turns out it ultimately was backed up by the science. Which, you don’t need a medical degree to understand. It’s just common sense.
Travel restrictions are just another form of social distancing from those traveling from the hotspot at the time, which was China, to prevent the American people from coming into contact with others who had been exposed to the virus, just as not going to work if you’re sick might.
https://www.cerescourier.com/opinion/editorial/biden-flips-china-travel-ban/
__________________________________________________________________________________
“Biden has said China isn’t a threat and has downplayed their ongoing campaigns to undermine the U.S. geopolitically, militarily and economically.
“China is going to eat our lunch? Come on, man,” Biden said during an Iowa campaign stop last summer. “I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us.” “The fact of the matter is we can do all we need to do without punishing anybody,” he continued.
Biden’s position on China is dangerous and not based in reality. For years the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been sending Chinese students to America’s top doctorate programs in order to gain access to university research labs. There, they steal intellectual property from the highest levels of U.S. science.
Now, we know China’s dangerous handling of viruses in its own labs has led to one of the most devastating and fastest economic destructions in global history.”
The Hill, Katie Pavlich, opinion contributor — 04/29/20
Wow . . . really creative, aren’t they? . . . .
Conclusions
1. The PRC has learned to use the language of ‘victimization’ (”RACIST!”) as weapon against the US.
2. US Media is is heavily influenced or out-right owned by the PRC.
It’s clear that they can’t really overuse the highly effective racist accusation. It works. It’s been embedded so effectively in the American psyche that the reaction from most people is automatic. Even when they know it’s a fake accusation, they are unable to oppose it. Its the democrats superpower.
We are getting our “news” from corrupt and ignorant people
It’s a sign of the Times.
EVERYTHING is racist with these woke goofballs.
They’ve worn the race card out....nobody gives a shite anymore.
Let’s simplify everything... it’s racist to Disagree with liberals.
Gotta give China credit for one thing: When they buy something, it stays bought. The mob could have learned a thing or two from the racketeering organization known as the PRC.
Over the last several decades, China has invested HEAVILY in media properties, academic institutions and NGO/ThinkTanks and that investment has paid off in spades the last year and a half.
We are going to see a lot of Chinese agents exposing themselves.
These people are dangerous. They would rather allow the chicoms to get away with releasing a deadly virus than call them on it and be branded “racist.”