Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Should Not Count on China’s Climate Goals
Townhall.com ^ | May 22, 2021 | Danielle Butcher

Posted on 05/22/2021 5:12:52 AM PDT by Kaslin

A new report this month from Rhodium Group explains that China’s 2019 greenhouse gas emissions eclipsed emissions from every single developed country in the world — combined. This is the first time China, the world’s worst polluter since emissions began to skyrocket in the ‘90s, has been able to claim this dubious distinction.

The U.S. peaked emissions in 2007 and, according to the IEA, has reduced more emissions than anyone else in the history of energy. We’ve been making historic reductions mainly because of two things considered off-limits by the progressive left: innovative fracking and carbon-free nuclear energy. While our emissions have been decreasing dramatically, China’s emissions haven’t even peaked yet, with a goal set to do so by 2030. This timeline gives China a free pass and an unfair economic advantage over us until then.

While the United States has become the world leader in reducing emissions, China’s unfettered pollution has the potential to negate the good work we have done and must keep doing. We can’t take their pledges on climate, human rights, or anything else at face value. We need to be realistic: China is a bad actor and strong U.S. leadership is needed to actually reduce global emissions.

Despite these facts, the U.S. is still somehow demonized in mainstream global climate rhetoric. The U.S. has work to do in order to continue reducing emissions, but few global actors seem willing to call out China for its excess. Criticism of their environmental record is often met with claims that China is still a developing nation, but the truth is they have the second largest economy in the world — just behind that of the United States.

Democrats often even praise China for their leadership in solar and wind deployment, as if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is doing that with moral conviction and concern for the environment. The truth is different: China’s government commits genocide, locks ethnic minorities in re-education camps, and even sterilizes women. China has only turned to renewables because there aren’t enough fossil fuels within the nation’s borders. That’s why they’ve been building a monopoly on rare-earth elements and critical minerals while keeping costs low with forced labor. Those resources are essential to making solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries for electric vehicles. Not only does the CCP want to minimize any dependence on foreign regimes for energy, but ideally, they want to make other countries dependent on them. For example, they continue to finance coal plants all across the world.

As the U.S. contemplates a renewable energy revolution, we must be careful not to depend too much on Chinese supply chains for rare-earth minerals and the manufacturing of renewable technologies, as some on the left have inadvertently proposed. As a matter of both national security and climate action, the U.S. must prioritize using both American natural resources and labor to fuel this mission. If we do not, we will have learned nothing by the pandemic caused by China’s recklessness.

We must build on what’s made the U.S. the leader in reducing emissions while also jumpstarting our economy following the COVID-19 pandemic. But we also must scale up U.S. mining and manufacturing so we don’t have to depend on the “kindness” of bad actors to fight climate change and fuel our way of life. The only way to reduce global emissions is with American leadership, powered by our free enterprise system and the might of innovation.

No one should trust China for their energy needs, so the U.S. must gain the world’s trust to do so instead. Expanding domestic manufacturing of rare-earth elements and critical minerals necessary for innovative energy technology is a win for our economy, our workers, and the environment. Exporting economical U.S. emission-reducing technologies to high-emitting countries will lower emissions while boosting our economy in the process. Fighting climate change and outmaneuvering China are two intrinsically-entwined goals.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: carbontax; china; climatechange

1 posted on 05/22/2021 5:12:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No kiddind.


2 posted on 05/22/2021 5:13:56 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep...it looks like Republicans are back to being the Republicans of old...demonizing other nations in an attempt to redirect attention from what is going on here.

Not this time.

For starters, what is a safe level of world-wide emissions? I’ve never gotten an answer to this question even though I’ve looked for it for years. China has high emissions because they’ve had to be the manufacturing center for virtue-signaling Americans who want their finished goods, but don’t want the moral stain of actually producing them. We’d rather blame other evil producers while outsourcing our manufacturing and putting our own citizens on welfare.


3 posted on 05/22/2021 5:25:58 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

China has already said they will continue to up emissions for several years...


4 posted on 05/22/2021 5:58:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/553028-chinas-emissions-now-eclipse-the-developed-world-preventing


5 posted on 05/22/2021 6:04:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Another thing to consider about China is they are the ones building coal plants in the rest of the world. From their perspective it is like their funding of roads and ports. It expands their export market and raises living standards. They see it as win win. I see it as Chinese supremacy but that's probably a racist comment.

Contrast that with our own leftists plans for Africa. I heard a woman on NPR a few months ago says "There's no reason that there shouldn't be a solar panel on every hut". The elitism and ignorance is epic. 2.5 million children die every year in the families of the 3 billion people who rely on open indoor fires (often dried dung) for cooking and heating.

A solar panel on a "hut" will not provide heat for cooking on demand. An expensiove array of panels plus even more expensive storage will provide heat on demand, but will cost at least 10 times what China is charging.

Alternatively the "hut" can get a electrical wires strung by Chinese leading from a coal plant built by China. By that point the family will have more than a hut, they will probably have an apartment.

I'm going with China on this one. Our homegrown leftists can ESAD.

6 posted on 05/22/2021 6:37:17 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
China continues to put a new high sulphur coal power plant on-line every 2.5 weeks.

They have NO plans to slow down in the foreseeable future.

They will, however continue producing more non-disposable solar panels to be subsidized by your tax dollars.

China is all to happy to watch America shut down its industry and economy, as they race to dominate world power.

7 posted on 05/22/2021 6:53:57 AM PDT by G Larry (Force the Universities to use their TAX FREE ENDOWMENTS to pay off Student loan debt!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Daniele Butcher is an idiot who seems to believe in global warning pseudo science political control.

She believes the emperor is wearing clothes.


8 posted on 05/22/2021 8:12:58 AM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The authors have the wrong title:

The correct title is:

The U.S. Cannot Count on China’s Climate Goals.


9 posted on 05/22/2021 8:18:26 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Paging Captain Obvious


10 posted on 05/22/2021 11:42:22 AM PDT by Starcitizen (So Indian H1B crybaby trash runs Free Republic moderation??? Seems so. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

11 posted on 05/22/2021 11:43:09 AM PDT by dead (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_vFiUUcBkc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson