Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2021 12:53:23 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: knighthawk

The idiot. It is not a loss of control of the machines for the overseeing entity to provide them to an auditor. However, it IS to allow Dominion to run everything and not provide the county with passwords or full access.

All machines must be open code for anyone to examine. And weighted votes are pure corruption. It should be an exceedingly simple program that merely tallies a count. There should be no connectivity of any kind, no USB ports, nothing. Like a computer used for classified work.


2 posted on 05/22/2021 12:58:24 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

This dim bulb apparently thinks the Senate can exercise it’s constitutional right to full oversight somehow without being able to examine ballots or machines.

Arizona was corrupted in this election. If it was honest, they wouldn’t be resisting this hard. They would be pleased to prove everything to the world.

The election was corrupt.


3 posted on 05/22/2021 1:01:06 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

She is a frigging idiot. Now I agree the machines should not be used, but not for her reason. They shouldn’t be used because they should go back to hand counting. Now her reason is that the software may be compromised - the Cyber Ninjas could have changed the code. She is either an idiot or intentionally lying ( probably both ). She has the original Dominion software held in escrow. All you have to do is take a hash of that ( which has probably already been done and is in escrow along with the software ). Now just go to each of the machines and take a hash of the software on the machine. If they match, nothing was changed.


4 posted on 05/22/2021 1:06:20 AM PDT by TheCipher (To my mind Judas Iscariot was nothing but a low, mean, premature Congressman. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Every damn Dominion machine owned by Arizona should be decertified, and sent to a shredder.


5 posted on 05/22/2021 1:08:15 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Der Impfstoff macht frei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Arrest. Prosecute. Sentence. Execute.


7 posted on 05/22/2021 1:41:28 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Does anyone know if she is a Soros paid poltiical whore?


8 posted on 05/22/2021 1:50:50 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Absolutely decertify ‘em all, then destroy ‘em. Get new, secure equipment from an honest, open source supplier.


9 posted on 05/22/2021 2:01:29 AM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan (Deplorably Neanderthal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Maybe the Democrats have a DIFFERENT CORRUPT COMPANY that will supply DIFFERENT CORRUPTED MACHINES for 2022.


12 posted on 05/22/2021 3:00:47 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Scumbag of State fraudulent election-stealer Katie Hobbs called President Trump and his supporters neo-nazis.

One would think she'd know after looking in a mirror.

13 posted on 05/22/2021 3:39:30 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I don’t see the down-side to ending the use of these machines in future elections.


14 posted on 05/22/2021 3:44:00 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (The 2020 election was stolen from MY President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I love this Maricopa county BS.

These machines will never be used again after the results of the audit come out so, yes, the audit is going to used again.

Not because they have been tainted or have been tampered with by the audit team, but because they are designed from the ground up to steal elections via fraud.

15 posted on 05/22/2021 3:57:27 AM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Decertify the machines should mean the election results would be decertified.


16 posted on 05/22/2021 4:30:27 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I have grave concerns regarding the security and integrity of these machines, given that the chain of custody, a critical security tenet, has been compromised and election officials do not know what was done to the machines while under Cyber Ninjas’ control.

Those Cyber Ninjas who had cameras pointing at them all the time?

17 posted on 05/22/2021 5:22:09 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I have grave concerns regarding the security and integrity of these machines, given that the chain of custody, a critical security tenet, has been compromised

These eff'n Rats are so damn clever. That statement is 100% correct. Chain of custody was broken - by Maricopa County.

This is just an attempt by Democrats to inoculate themselves against the audit findings. It is a constant campaign of twisting facts and lying to seed doubt. I can only hope that enough people see through this and it comes back and bites the Rats in the ass.

18 posted on 05/22/2021 5:22:22 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” ― Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

19 posted on 05/22/2021 5:24:20 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I’m very interested in what I see as an under-investigated election issue:

Who certified the DVS equipment, and did they follow the law in doing do? If so, the law need to be revised substantially.

How can any “authority” approve and certify an election system with an inherent capacity for changing votes, no transparency, proportional vote counting, etc.? Proving intent of the designers matters, but it isn’t required to see that these systems are easily compromised and hard to monitor. Should NOT be certified for use anywhere in America. Any official who certified them is either incompetent or criminal, and needs to go immediately.


26 posted on 05/22/2021 8:52:18 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson