Posted on 05/13/2021 11:10:27 AM PDT by george76
Say what you will about President Harry Truman, but at least he didn't leave the White House a suspiciously rich man. He also actually went home, to Independence Missouri, and moved into a modest house he didn't own. It was the same house belonging to his wife's family where he had lived with Bess (and his mother-in-law!) decades earlier.
Flat broke, and unwilling to accept corporate board positions or commercial endorsements, Truman sought a much-needed loan from a local Missouri bank. For several years his sole income was a $113 monthly Army pension, and only the sale of a parcel of land he inherited with his siblings prevented him from nearly "being on relief," as Truman allegedly stated. In the 1950s, perhaps almost entirely to alleviate Truman's embarrassing financial situation, Congress authorized a $25,000 yearly pension for ex-presidents Truman and the much-wealthier Herbert Hoover.
Contrast this with the luxe post-presidential life of the Reagans in Bel Air, or the still-unfolding saga of the Obama's jet-setting life between Kalorama, Palm Springs, and Oahu!
But even if Truman's homespun honesty and common man persona sometime wore thin, he deserves enormous credit for the startling admission that he regretted creating the CIA. Speaking to a biographer in the 1960s, less than 20 years after signing the National Security Act of 1947, Truman expressed a sense of foreboding about what the agency had become, and would become:
Merle Miller: Mr. President, I know that you were responsible as President for setting up the CIA. How do you feel about it now? Truman: I think it was a mistake. And if I'd know what was going to happen, I never would have done it.
This is decidedly not the kind of thing ex-presidents usually say. We won't expect George W. Bush to announce his regrets over invading Iraq anytime soon. But Truman's instincts were right, even if he couldn't have imagined what the CIA and the entire Deep State nexus would become. In Truman's era, spying and subterfuge were physical endeavors, involving skilled agents and analog technology. Today the covert arts don't require James Bond, but instead a trained technician who can pull information from a server farm.
The digital revolution gives modern intelligence agencies vastly more power than they had during the Cold War spy days: they simply access existing metadata, from whatever source, rather than collect it in real time. And intelligence gathering is not just a supplementary form of warfare waged against hostile foreign governments, but also a domestic political tool that allows Deep State actors to strike at civilian and political targets. As Mr. Trump has discovered, the "strike" can consist of a coordinated media attacks, leaks from trusted officials, and even bizarre triangulations aimed at pinning his election on Vladimir Putin.
One justification Truman provides for his action is the old bureaucratic unicorn known as "consolidation," which is often promised by politicians but never delivered. When then-congressman Ron Paul and his staff furiously argued against the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, GOP congressional leaders assured us that an entirely new department would actually consolidate several different agencies and functions. "It will save money!", they told us, to bring all of these disparate federal employees under one efficient umbrella. Fast forward to 2017, and DHS is just another failed department with a thousand-page, $42 billion annual budget.
But Truman apparently bought into the consolidation argument:
Truman: the President needed at that time a central organization that would bring all the various intelligence reports we were getting in those days, and there must have been a dozen of them, maybe more, bring them all into one organization so that the President would get one report on what was going on in various parts of the world. Now that made sense, and that's why I went ahead and set up what they called the Central Intelligence Agency.
Unfortunately it was only in hindsight that Truman came to see the "Iron Law of Oligarchy" at work, which posits that all organizations-- particularly government bureaucracies-- eventually fall under the control of an elite few. That elite, he came to understand, did not include the president or his cabinet:
Truman: But it got out of hand. The fella ... the one that was in the White House after me never paid any attention to it, and it got out of hand. Why, they've got an organization over there in Virginia now that is practically the equal of the Pentagon in many ways. And I think I've told you, one Pentagon is one too many.
Now, as nearly as I can make out, those fellows in the CIA don't just report on wars and the like, they go out and make their own, and there's nobody to keep track of what they're up to. They spend billions of dollars on stirring up trouble so they'll have something to report on. They've become ... it's become a government all of its own and all secret. They don't have to account to anybody.
That's a very dangerous thing in a democratic society, and it's got to be put a stop to. The people have got a right to know what those birds are up to. And if I was back in the White House, people would know. You see, the way a free government works, there's got to be a housecleaning every now and again, and I don't care what branch of the government is involved. Somebody has to keep an eye on things.
And when you can't do any housecleaning because everything that goes on is a damn secret, why, then we're on our way to something the Founding Fathers didn't have in mind. Secrecy and a free, democratic government don't mix. And if what happened at the Bay of Pigs doesn't prove that, I don't know what does. You have got to keep an eye on the military at all times, and it doesn't matter whether it's the birds in the Pentagon or the birds in the CIA.
This is a remarkable statement by Truman, even if delivered during a relatively unguarded moment with a trusted biographer. It shows a humility and willingness to admit grave error that is lacking in public life today. It also stands on its own as a inadvertent libertarian argument against state power itself.
Did Truman stand by his statements about the CIA? Yes and no. Speaking to Esquire in 1971, he continued to praise the agency as a needed consolidation:
When I took over the Presidency he received information from just about everywhere, from the Secretary of State and the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Department of Agriculture. Just everybody. And sometimes they didn't agree as to what was happening in various parts of the world. So I got couple of admirals together, and they formed the Central Intelligence Agency for the benefit and convenience of the President of the United States . . . So instead of the President having to look through a bunch of papers two feet high, the information was coordinated so that the President could arrive at the facts. It's still going, and it's going very well.
Hypocritical backpedaling on Truman's part? Perhaps. But his biographer Merle Miller calls the Esquire quote "pretty faint praise," and more importantly Truman never ordered the removal of his brief chapter on the CIA from the Plain Speaking biography. His mea culpa still stands, in print. So while he could not have fully imagined what the CIA would become, he knew in his gut he had made a terrible mistake-- a mistake we are only beginning to understand today thanks to WikiLeaks.
Huh? You mean the "Wild Bill" Donovan who cozied up to Stalin, and welcomed the greatest ever Soviet spy penetration of the U.S.? Do a little research.
This isn't to say the CIA's an improvement. Every bureaucratic organization has to be purged regularly or it becomes a power unto itself: the IRS is a great example.
Truman won by voter fraud. It’s a democrat tradition.
So Truman killed JFK by accident....
You are WAY off base on that. Do you have any proof. I will post more after work.
Very interesting. And of course it’s well known that Eisenhower had some thoughts on the military industrial complex.
Harry had a little short memory with Ike, didn’t he?
“So was Schumer.
That Schumer, one of the senior members of the U.S. Senate, would admit on national television that he is scared of the intelligence agencies was one of the most alarming statements I have ever heard. That tells you who is really running the country.
I thought the documentaries about Jason Bourne were pretty good.
They/it probably owned even a few small airports on both coasts and on the Gulf.
In succession, Secretaries of State Byrnes, Marshall and Acheson were aware that their in-house Intelligence and Research division (especially during the years headed by Ivy League savant William Langer) was being asked to perform duties and provide studies much in excess of the capability of personnel available to the Department of State. It was their compliance that led to the genesis and then expansion of Truman’s CIA. One way or another, with the Cold War building, there would have been a CIA whether Truman liked it or not.
He was socialist swine that sounded like Al Gore on economics.
I don’t think Ex-Presidents getting rich was a thing yet or I’m sure he would have cashed in. As the product of a corrupt KC political machine I’d doubt he’d have had a moral objection.
Having just read the history of the CIA and it’s beginnings you are way off track here. It’s a lot more complicated than you think and the center of it all were the Dulles brothers.
The Intelligence Community runs the US, and much of the world. They are completely unaccountable. Flynn was kneecapped because he stated he was going to audit them, find out how out of control they are. They got to the judge, of course, and ensured Flynn would never be out from under a cloud. Long enough to remove Trump.
IC Corruption - bump for later...
If I had to vote for “best” 20th century RAT president, Truman gets my vote for at least being “least bad” RAT. Certainly I find him more likeable and honest than the sleazy corrupt horndog JFK and his faux “Camelot” persona. Ironic since Truman was a product of one the most corrupt RAT political machines in the country at the time, as you noted. I still would have voted for Dewey over Trump, and the Fair Deal was pretty much New Deal lite. But meh, JFK would have done a lot more damage if he had lived.
yep-ignorant article-on Truman and on reference to Reagan’s $s, he wasn’t even in top 10 richest presidents and he worked in private sector for 30 years. Reagan wasn’t that rich-yes house in Bel Air but that money came from his movie and advertising days-his ranch house was tiny, linoleum floors, he used ties to put a foot stool at the end of the bed so he didn’t have to buy a longer bed-and he did a lot of the work
He was also anti-communist, not communist-friendly like Nixon.
Bull. And the "other" conservative President of the 20th century, Ronald Reagan, certainly DISAGREED with you on that, as he OPPOSED Kennedy in 1960 because Kennedy was TOO LIBERAL. Even more incredible, Reagan was a "Democrat for Nixon" at the time (he didn't officially switch parties until 4 years later) so Kennedy was TOO LIBERAL for Reagan WHEN REAGAN WAS STILL A DEMOCRAT. No doubt because JFK was from the east coast liberal elite wing of the party rather than being an old fashioned faux "conservative" RAT from the south (and even those RATS were hardly "conservative" on economic issues)
Here's a nice speech from 1962 where Kennedy pushes for Bernie Sanders style socialized medicine. If that's your idea of "conservative", I'd hate to see what liberal looks like:
John F Kennedy argues for universal healthcare
>> He was also anti-communist <<
Fun fact I recently learned a year or two ago: the "anti-communist" JFK helped END the Hollywood blacklist against communist sympathizers by publicly promoting the film Spartacus after the American people discovered the film's screenwriter was blacklisted communist Dalton Trumbo. The resulting outcry lead to an attempt to boycott the film, but JFK promoted Trumbo. Kennedy even "crossed the picket line" of people protesting Trumbo from being reinstated to Hollywood after the fallout from his communist activities.
JFK was "anti-communist" the same way Joe Biden was "against" Presidents using executive orders. It polled well with swing voters.
=President Warren Harding has entered the chat=
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.