Posted on 05/12/2021 5:15:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that births in the USA reached another historic low in 2020.
For the sixth consecutive year, the birth rate dropped -- this time by 4%. The average annual drop in the five previous years was 2%.
The rate at which American women are having babies is way below the rate necessary to keep the population steady-state -- that is, for the population not to shrink.
A steady-state population requires a total fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman. In 2020, it was 1.64.
Needless to say, for politicians, there is no problem that does not have a government solution, and the birth dearth is no exception.
Both President Joe Biden and Sen. Mitt Romney have plans for bolstering American families. The president's American Families Plan proposes to spend a modest $1.8 trillion. Romney is pitching his Family Security Act, which proposes per-child government payments up to $1,250 per family per month.
Romney writes in The Wall Street Journal, "Young people are marrying less and having fewer kids in part because they don't feel confident about their job prospects and financial security."
But if less marriage and fewer children are the result of today's economic stress, why is it that in 1960, the fertility rate was 3.58 -- more than double today's 1.64 -- yet today's real per capita income, per the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, is over three times higher than it was in 1960?
According to the Institute for Family Studies, in 2018, 35% of Americans ages 25 to 50 had never been married. In 1970, only 9% in this age range had never been married.
Is this because times got harder? I don't think so. Per capita income in 2018 was 2.4 times higher than it was in 1970.
I don't think our young people are avoiding marriage and children because of concerns about financial security.
I think they are avoiding marriage and children because they don't want marriage and children.
In a Pew Research survey conducted in 2019, 16% said having children is essential for a man to have a fulfilling life, and 16% said marriage is essential for a man to have a fulfilling life, while 57% said "having a job or career they enjoy" is essential for a man to have a fulfilling life.
Regarding women, 22% said having children is essential for a fulfilling life. Seventeen percent said marriage is essential for a fulfilling life. And 46% said "having a job or career they enjoy" is essential for a fulfilling life.
What does it all mean?
In 1960, 9.1% of our population was over age 65. By 2019, 16.2% of the population was over 65.
A graying population, due to fewer and fewer children, means a shrinking portion of the population that is working and producing, and increasingly large numbers of elderly and retirees whom those working must support.
Consider our Social Security system, where retirees' benefits are drawn from the payroll tax paid by working citizens. In 1945, there were 41.9 working citizens for every retiree. By 1950, this was down to 16.5 to 1. By 1990, it was 3.4 to 1. And as of 2013 (the latest data available), it was 2.8 to 1.
Trustees of Social Security report that by 2034, 13 years from now, the system will only have sufficient revenue to pay 76% of the benefits due to retirees.
Per the Kaiser Family Foundation, in 2016, those age 65 and over constituted 16% of our population yet represented 36% of all health care spending.
The collapse of marriage, family and the national birthrate is the result of the secularization of our culture. Faith and values have been displaced by materialism and egotism.
How do we turn it around? As a starter, let's have more parental choice in education so parents can get their children out of public schools and into religious schools, where they can learn values that sustain life.
If Americans won’t have children then I can guarantee that immigrants will be brought in to make up the shortfall. This will be the correct course of action to keep America strong when it’s own citizens won’t bear children.
I am not aware of anything preventing parents from taking children out of public schools and enrolling them in religious schools that will teach them whatever values the parent wants. Their freedom to do so is complete and absolute.
In a secular materialistic culture, committed interpersonal relationships have low utility. When self gratification is the highest value, putting energy into loving other people is seen as a cost with no benefit.
Not everyone can afford to send their kids to private schools. Also not everyone is qualified to home school their children.
“Both President Joe Biden and Sen. Mitt Romney have plans for bolstering American families.”
Oh, thank God. Sarc.
Solution...If you send your kids to a non-public school, you do not pay school taxes. That's really the way it worked in the early years.
and yet both are pedophiles and pedophile supporters,
and Romnsky even made his money at Bain transporting live
children from Planned Parenthood to the companies
that removed adrenochrome and organs.
DEPOPULATORS love it
So then it is about economics and not about values?
My parents put me through 12 years of Catholic school and they did it on one blue-collar income. Did they sacrifice to do so? Yes, but they did it because they thought it was important enough to justify the sacrifice. It never even crossed their mind that maybe the government should be subsidizing their decision. My how things have changed.
What's stopping them? Private schools all across the country are filled with students whose parents also pay taxes that fund their local schools. None of them are expecting a subsidy.
Nothing prevents parents in this country from sending their children to private school or to home school them.
You are correct. Also the idea that it’s the schools that SHOULD instill values is nonsense. Children absorb their parents values.
So I should give up my job to home school?? Or pay school taxes AND TUITION? Tuition is very expensive these days.
“The arrogance of Mark Steyn knows no bounds.” - Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Ambassador to the United States
(hardover jacket of the book...yes, I have both)
UNLESS they fall under the same courts and governance as do western white males. Oppressive child support orders and no say so over the child’s rearing.
Wow, a triple. Don’t see that often.
In other words it's about economics and not values.
So I should give up my job to home school?? Or pay school taxes AND TUITION? Tuition is very expensive these days.
If it is important enough to you then you find a way to do it. Hundreds of thousands of parents in this country were and are faced with that decision, including my own, and the find a way to do it because it's that important to them. If you feel it isn't worth the sacrifice then public schools are there for you.
Also very true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.