Posted on 05/09/2021 7:18:59 PM PDT by Triple
I agree - MIT is being a bit cute/mocking in this piece. That is why the mystery nucleosides mention strikes me. Did they miss the talking point that said “Don’t talk about the modifications to the RNA?”
Great video -
It seems Gates started planning/funding the creation of these gene therapy approach vaccines many years ago.
Around the time the WHO was developing vaccines with “birth control” built in as an added feature.
And Trump walked right into the trap with “Operation Warp Speed.”
They already had the mRNA program ready and waiting.
Oh yeah, did you know that one of the heads of the drug companies handling their own jab, said that covid is going away this summer and that when that happens they will be raising the price of their jab to $150. (Now that may be the emergency thing goes away. I don't really know what he meant.)
Like what? It is going to be over AND they will be raising their price? Would it make sense that if it was going away wouldn't they not need the shots anymore?
All this for a genetically-engineered cold virus.
I need me a flipping break.
No argument here.
- Hard to grasp the depth of the evil we are facing.
But watching that clip of george bernard Shaw in the Gates video: would send a chill down a mortician’s spine. (Re Eugenics)
My understanding of this (and I am not a geneticist, but rather a Computer Scientist, who is used to a different scheme for encoding information) is that the “modified nucleosides” are simply substitutions. If you think of the generic code in terms of the alphabet of AGCT, there are several base-pair substitutions that can be made that in certain circumstances express exactly the same amino acids, but the resulting protein might fold differently. I read an explanation of this that claimed that if you just took the coding for the spike protein and used it in the vaccine verbatim, the produced protein was misshapen (did not ‘stand up’ like it was supposed to) due to not being attached to a virus therefore was useless. The base-pair substitutions were able to produce exactly the same protein, but in a way that was correctly folded and therefore induced the correct immune response. Again, though, IANAG.
Don’t forget that when the invader is a “virus”, the virus is actively attacking cells to produce these clones. The vaccine doses (which in my understanding are identical, first and second) are effectively inert, except maybe tying up some ACE2 receptors temporarily. They cannot reproduce, and are only there in order to induce the immune system to recognize and react to them. In other words, they don’t need to be ‘fought off’. If the immune system doesn’t get to some of them, they will simply degrade harmlessly.
Not really. - the lipid coat around the mRNA in the vaccine does not need to bind to a receptor site/protein to pass into the cell.
———-
it is possible that the substitute nucleosides are not analogs, but are different naturally modified nucleosides with control functions . They are most likely (but a guess) methylated adenosine. (But they could be less-natural analogs.)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167638/
Follow the link above to see details on why methylated adenosine is my best guess.
This type of RNA modification and/or targeting is what may save my husband’s life. He has CML which is the Philadelphia chromosome very rare type of leukemia. This technology concept has been studied and tested for over a decade.
It is great new technology. I sincerely hope it helps your family.
The threshold for treating sick people is very different than the one for administering a new approach to healthy people.
BTW: Gene therapy is often turned down by sick people, due to the risks involved.
I was talking about after transcription. I believe that they had to do some substitutions so that the mRNA resulted in the production of a correctly shaped S-protein…the issue being that using the exact sequence from the virus resulted in a misfolded protein being produced in the absence of a virus particle to support it.
Ok - and that would be separate from the modification needed to make the RNA more durable.
I also have autoimmune diseases. We both got the Pfizer vaccine. Time will tell, but as of now, I have no concerns. My sister and 2 closest friends all work in hospitals with critical patients and have seen some of the worst of Coronavirus. They are healthy, younger and have all had the vaccine.
All of my doctors, all younger than me, have had the vaccine. I’ve also known firsthand people (5 so far) that have died from COVID - all under the age of 50. Another friend is a “longtermer” after being on a ventilator last summer. This morning, I found out that my previous next door neighbor who is my age (50’s) was released from the hospital yesterday after kidney failure and multiple transfusions from her 2nd bout with COVID. I haven’t heard yet if she had the vaccine.
If this thing is as bad as some fear, we will be in short supply of medical assistance from surgeons, doctors, nurses, EMS, etc because most have had the vaccine.
Time will tell. To quote ALL of my Healthcare providers...this may not prevent me from getting COVID, but it gives me a fighting chance to survive it.
Many health professionals are also not getting vaccinated at least until it is approved by the FDA. (Not EUA)
Meant to say thanks for the kind words. No luck with first tier drug. Should know more about the 2nd tier drug effect in a couple of months. We’re on the bone marrow transplant list now but no match yet. The drug could be huge if it works.
Moderna is a cancer company that has not fielded a single vaccine in its history. They also have no testimonials from patients they have saved with their miracle cures.
Oh this stuff works alright. Just look at the VAERS reports for all the symptoms and they are all eerily similar. All immune system malfunctions.
The doses are not the same in the double kill shots. I think the first is not that many particles injected. The second has more. If you look at VAERS you will see that most of the problems started after the 2nd injection.
I fully agree with you that something is off. Way more testing and analysis needed to be done before a rollout like this. I did verify that the first and second doses are identical for both Pfizer and Moderna though. The more intense response is probably due to the “prior knowledge” of the immune system.
Straight from the Pfizer Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers:
“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.”
Note the word at the beginning of the ingredients list, “includes.” The ingredients in the cookies I baked yesterday INCLUDED eggs, flour and butter. They also had other ingredients.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.