Posted on 05/06/2021 6:12:30 AM PDT by Red Badger
Arizona’s top elections officer Katie Hobbs on Wednesday alleged multiple points of concern regarding the forensic audit of the 2020 presidential election currently underway in Maricopa County.
The Epoch Times In a letter to former Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a Republican who is the state Senate’s liaison for the audit, Hobbs outlined 13 points of concern over how the audit is being run. This included seven points of concern over counting procedures that the state Senate and audit contractor Cyber Ninjas disclosed, as well as six points of concern over what her observers saw at the audit site.
Under terms of a lawsuit settlement filed on Wednesday, defendants Bennett, Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, and the lead auditor, Florida-based Cyber Ninjas have 48 hours to respond to Hobbs’ concerns. If the concerns are not addressed, Hobbs could take them back to court for breach of contract.
The audit began on April 23 and continues at Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, a venue the auditors have booked and secured until May 14.
Hobbs, a Democrat, alleged that the procedures governing the audit do not ensure accuracy, security, and transparency.
“I’m not sure what compelled you to oversee this audit, but I’d like to assume you took this role with the best of intentions,” she told Bennett in the letter. “It is those intentions I appeal to now: either do it right, or don’t do it at all.”
The Arizona Democratic Party filed a last-minute lawsuit against state Senate leadership to try to stop the audit from going ahead but their bid to immediately halt it was rebuffed by a judge. The settlement means the case has concluded.
“The settlement in ADP v Fann requires the Senate to have procedures to protect our ballots, election equipment, and data. Today, I put the Senate on notice that security shortfalls remain and must be addressed under the agreement,” Hobbs said in a statement.
The official Twitter account for the audit, run by Bennet’s team, said late on Wednesday that Hobbs “continues to make baseless claimes [sic] about this forensic audit but has never led an election audit in her entire career.” The message declared, “The audit continues!”
The group furthermore encouraged Twitter users to retweet if they think audits are a state right. Another statement released later on Wednesday reads, “Democrat [Secretary of State Katie Hobbs] who does not support election audits or transparency now wants the Federal Government to get involved in the Arizona Senate forensic audit. Arizona has the authority to conduct this audit without interference from the Feds!”
Bennett did not immediately respond to a request for comment over the contents of Hobbs’ letter.
He told the Arizona Capitol Times late Wednesday of Hobbs’ concerns, “I think that most of the things in her letter are completely unfounded. And the ones that have a little bit of legitimacy can be dealt with pretty easily.”
Bennett did not elaborate as to what concerns would fall into the latter category.
Among the seven concerns based on the disclosed procedures, Hobbs alleged that there were “no procedures for hiring qualified, unbiased counters.” She noted that former State Representative Anthony Kern, a Republican, has been among the people counting the ballots in the audit.
Kern’s name is listed on the ballot “not only as a candidate for State Representative but as a Presidential Elector—the exact race for which he is counting,” Hobbs wrote, adding, “While these facts would be disqualifying in any professional recount or audit, unfortunately, there are additional reasons why Mr. Kern is not trustworthy to fulfill this role.”
Hobbs in her letter also took aim at a number of procedures that she said “appear better suited for chasing conspiracy theories than as a part of a professional audit,” which included using UV lights to search for watermarks, measuring the thickness of ballots, searching for folds in ballots, and looking at ballots under a microscope.
She said these measures are “completely unnecessary steps if the goal of the audit is to validate the election results.”
She also questioned how tally sheets from ballot counters would be added up, and noted that her office had “received no real explanation” over the matter “other than that an accounting firm will handle it later.”
“This is not transparency. Further, it appears that a single person enters the totals from the tally sheets into an electronic spreadsheet, leaving wide open the opportunity for error, inadvertent or otherwise,” she wrote. “At minimum, a bipartisan team of at least two individuals should aggregate the tally sheets or otherwise confirm that data is entered accurately for aggregation.”
In addition to concerns over the disclosed procedures, Hobbs alleged in her letter that observers from her office have seen a number of problems, which include inadequate physical security of ballots, unattended computers at the forensic analysis tables, constantly changing rules in the audit procedures since the beginning of the audit, and “frequent violations” of the procedures that do exist.
The Arizona Republican-led Senate previously hired four out-of-state firms to carry out the audit, which are Wake Technology Services, CyFIR, Digital Discovery, and Cyber Ninjas.
The state Senate has said that the “broad and detailed” audit “will validate every area of the voting process” and includes, but is not limited to, scanning all the ballots, a full hand recount, auditing the voter registration and votes cast, the vote counts, and the electronic voting system. This includes examining some 2.1 million ballots, as well as voting equipment that includes 385 tabulators.
Bennett told The Epoch Times on Monday that the audit may last longer than originally planned. An analysis of the equipment used in the 2020 election was completed over the weekend, but reviewing other materials will need more time, he said.
President Joe Biden was the first Democratic presidential nominee to win Maricopa County in decades.
Zachary Stieber contributed to this report.
George Soros has spent a large part of the last decade funding campaigns for secretaries of State who oversee elections and state attorneys general.
These funds are laundered through several “nonprofit” organizations. These offices are usually not funded with very much in the way of campaign money. Soros’ strategy is paying off big time for leftists.
I think all nonprofit status should be eliminated. People will still donate to valid charities that they want to support without the special tax deals and oversight deals that nonprofits have.
Letting Katie Hobbs weigh in on this is like having Al Capone interfere with his tax audit. She is a long time Democrat politician and was “elected” as Arizona SoS in 2018. Did she really receive the most votes, or was her own “election” also based on fraud? This audit might well reveal:
1) that means and methods of election fraud that have been evolving for years;
2) that there is reason to conduct another audit to ascertain whether Hobbs was legitimately really elected to her current office.
3) that she utterly failed to follow the law in 2020, failed to keep clean voter rolls, and failed in her duty to ensure a clean election.
Katie Hobbs has a LOT TO LOSE and a massive conflict of interest. The State Senate and Courts should ban her from any involvement with the audit, and gag her from even speaking about it.
The Arizona Democratic Party filed a last-minute lawsuit against state Senate leadership to try to stop the audit from going ahead but their bid to immediately halt it was rebuffed by a judge. The settlement means the case has concluded.
“The settlement in ADP v Fann requires the Senate to have procedures to protect our ballots, election equipment, and data. Today, I put the Senate on notice that security shortfalls remain and must be addressed under the agreement,” Hobbs said in a statement.”
The article then speaks of Hobbs taking this back to court. The Arizona Democrat Party is the Plaintiff. Hobbs theoretically represents the State of Arizona as SoS. How does Hobbs have standing to go back to court over an agreement she is not a party to? Is she is coordinating with the ADP, that would seem to indicate partisan collusion. She seems dangerously confused on whether she represents the Citizens of Arizona, or the ADP.
Maybe the US Supreme Court will stand for JUSTICE?
Katie Hobbs is the far left AZ Dem Sec of State. Too bad, Katie, the audit will be done in 8 days and there is no line of partisan crap you can spew that will stop it. Hopefully, they’ll find your fingerprints on the fraud and we can get rid of you
dems are fighting against this audit like they’re fighting for everyone to get the jab
Because of that, I’m suspect of both
Bump that!
Actually they have already said all that will happen on Msy 24 is they will pause for 4 or 5 days
And then they can start back up
“Hatie” Hobbs, Democrat NaziCommie of Arizona.
This is the brilliance of the Soros machine - installing Democrat secretaries of state in swing states...
In the 2018 elections, she ran against local businessman Steve Gaynor in the contest. On November 6, 2018, the Associated Press prematurely called the race on election night for Gaynor, despite 600,000 ballots left to count statewide.
With the race as close as it was, neither Hobbs nor Gaynor initially claimed victory.
In the days to come, Gaynor's lead narrowed as more and more ballots were counted. On November 16, 2018, Hobbs was officially declared as the winner by a margin of 20,000 votes.
She is the first Democrat to hold the post since 1995 and is holding the post as a Democrat under a Republican Governor.
“At minimum, a bipartisan team of at least two individuals should aggregate the tally sheets...”
I agree, they should have one person from the MAGA party and one person from the America First party to make it truly bipartisan.
Her “degrees” are in social work.
Tells you all you need to know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.