Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: luvie

That seems reasonable. Although I’d give felons of any type their rights back after their sentence/fines are served.


60 posted on 05/05/2021 9:35:10 PM PDT by Shadylake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Shadylake

Unless they are violent felons. Those shouldn’t ever see daylight again. LOL!


63 posted on 05/05/2021 9:40:09 PM PDT by luvie (The bravery and dedication of our troops in keeping us safe & free make me proud to be an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Shadylake
You said: Although I’d give felons of any type their rights back after their sentence/fines are served.

Nope. Far too broad a statement. The issue is recurrent danger. But, there are some felonies that are not related to violence that restoring after penalty is served makes sense. I know people who have not been restored after 15 years, who have never committed another crime. In one case it was at 19 years of age, was not violent or drugs. The law in Texas is 20 years after sentence served. There are other cases that I know of that court action has restored them in much quicker time.

96 posted on 05/06/2021 2:05:15 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson