Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Science Says If You're Vaccinated, Enjoy Life Again
Townhall.com ^ | April 28, 2021 | Betsy McCaughy

Posted on 04/28/2021 5:35:24 AM PDT by Kaslin

For 14 months, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended draconian restrictions on Americans' daily lives to combat COVID-19. The CDC made light of the hardships and economic losses the restrictions inflicted. Call the agency the "Centers for Doubletalk and Confusion." Now, evidence is emerging that the restrictions were based on flimsy science or sheer guesswork.

Last week, MIT researchers showed that the CDC's six-foot social distancing rule has no basis in science. If you're indoors, your risk is the same whether an infected person is three feet away from you, or six feet away, or even 60 feet away.

So much for carefully standing six feet apart in the grocery line. It's a joke. On you.

In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the MIT researchers explained that an infected person emits the virus in an aerosol that can waft across indoor space, traveling 60 feet or more. The six-foot rule, which restaurants, churches, schools, gyms and retailers follow, offers no protection. The key determinants are whether you're wearing a mask and how much time you spend in the space.

On Sunday, White House health guru Anthony Fauci pulled the veil off another CDC guideline, wearing a mask outdoors. He admitted the risk of contracting COVID outdoors is "really, really quite low." Scientists have known that for months because outdoor air movement will disperse the aerosol. You'd have to be talking nose to nose with an infected person to catch COVID-19 outdoors.

On Tuesday, President Joe Biden announced that the CDC is eliminating outdoor masking for people who are vaccinated. Truth is, outdoor masking is ridiculous in almost all circumstances. Scientists have known that since they learned how the virus generally spreads.

When the pandemic hit the U.S. in February 2020, scientists suspected the virus was transmitted on surfaces and through droplets emitted when people sneeze or cough. With no knowledge about COVID-19, they applied what they knew about influenza. When a person with the flu coughs, droplets land on the floor or a surface within six feet. That was the origin of the six-foot rule.

It was guesswork. As former Food and Drug Administration head Scott Gottlieb says, the CDC should disclose when they're uncertain about the science behind a recommendation so we can decide "how seriously we want to take it."

By June, "superspreader" events showed that COVID-19 differed from flu. Though COVID can be spread on surfaces and through droplets like flu, it more often floats across indoor spaces and is blown away outdoors.

That's when the CDC should have reconsidered the six-foot rule and the outdoor masking rule. Instead, Americans struggled to comply.

At the Doubletree in Syracuse, New York, hundreds of banquet department jobs depend on hosting big weddings. That's not possible, because New York state is requiring tables be six feet apart, in keeping with CDC guidance.

The same six-foot rule has been "the biggest barrier to getting kids back in school," according to infectious disease specialist Westyn Branch-Elliman. In March, the CDC revised guidelines but only for elementary schools. This week, as New York students return to class, the six-foot rule is still being applied in middle and high school, limiting capacity.

Johns Hopkins' Dr. Marty Makary faults the CDC's "counter-science track record of being late and wrong."

Even less scientific than the six-foot rule is the agency's guidance for the fully vaccinated. The agency tells them to "continue to wear masks, maintain physical distance and practice other prevention measures when visiting with unvaccinated people."

That guidance eliminates a major incentive for getting the shots and will slow America's recovery. Infections among the vaccinated do occur, but rarely, and serious illness is even rarer. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines reduce the risk of developing COVID by 90 to 95%, compared with being unvaccinated. U.S. data show the risk of getting infected after these vaccines is a minuscule 0.008%.

The science is clear: Get vaccinated and enjoy life again.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: covid1984; covidiancult; covidlockdown; covidvaccine; junkscience; looneytunes; planedemic; scamdemic; vaccinations; vaccine; vaxxerganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Kaslin

This is really quite well done, as is the recent jeremiad by Karl Denninger, who, as usual, claims absolute certainty based on his own opinions.

The key to the whole mess is the confusion between droplets and aerosols.

I myself thought, and made in-hospital program planning dependent on, the probability of aerosol spread. This was strongly suggested by Wuhan and was absolutely clear after Bergamo and Manhattan.

This was the one thing the government would not say, or act on, even though it explained almost all of the discrepancies between the proposed droplet spread and the observed superspreading events vs. the many non-spreading events.


61 posted on 04/28/2021 1:51:29 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

LOL. I wish you’d quoted my whole comment: Mods wiped it. I can’t even recall what I wrote.

Guess I’ll have to start copying my comments again, since it seems some jackass enjoys being a censor.


62 posted on 04/28/2021 7:23:54 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

That was brilliant!!! 🤣🤣🤣


63 posted on 04/28/2021 7:27:42 PM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who the hell listens to these people? Ignore them and live your life.


64 posted on 04/29/2021 3:29:11 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

My husband likes to joke they should be more worried about the TB and the looks on their faces are priceless. haha


65 posted on 04/29/2021 3:31:02 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince
There was less than a .5 chance of dying from the virus and probably even less if you didn’t have any pre existing conditions.

A way smaller chance than that if they had used therapeutics at onset and steroids for the autoimmune phase. Getting Orange man, selling product, and cementing fascism was the goal. Not saving lives.

66 posted on 04/29/2021 3:42:24 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
I can’t even recall what I wrote.

We were separated at birth!

67 posted on 04/29/2021 5:41:40 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

I saw nothing in it that would have required removal.


68 posted on 04/29/2021 5:42:36 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am enjoying life without being vaccinated. I am not shaking like a dog trying to shit a peach seed and staying awake all not worrying that I might get Covid 19.


69 posted on 04/29/2021 5:47:12 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

LOL


70 posted on 04/29/2021 6:25:28 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Thanks. I didn’t think so. I usually copy the comments when I’m responding ‘hotly’ to another; a random comment in a thread could only have been targeted by a ‘censor’. But we already knew that one or more mods were just that.


71 posted on 04/29/2021 6:27:26 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson