Posted on 04/24/2021 11:55:49 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
There is not going to be any funny business taking place with this audit. This amount of transparency is exactly how every election should take place.
We reposted this video because many people have not watched it, and we need to ensure everyone is armed with the facts on how this is taking place.
My greatest fear is that they will look honestly, and find nothing wrong.
I have no doubt there was fraud. But I’m afraid they had plenty of time to cover it up.
Looks pretty good...
With the information obtained by this audit about the corruption methodologies used in 2020, the communists will immediately go to work to patch up their corruption-system weaknesses in time for the 2022 election...
I agree But the Dems are trying so hard to stop it they must be afraid all the cheating did not get covered up.
My concern is the Dems will physically destroy the building
Watch the video. It shows how ballot counting should be done everywhere. Cameras and more cameras, cameras everywhere watching everything that goes on.
Las Vegas casinos can do it with cards at the poker and black jack tables.
I guess doing it with ballots is "rayciss."
If there are manufactured votes and illegals voting and out of state people voting, it’s tough to cover that. The numbers won’t add up.
I think that Arizona audit is going to have a lasting impact on how ballots are counted.
The technology they are using allows the public to be virtual poll watchers to verify election counts
My greatest fear is that they will look honestly, and find nothing wrong.
The real fraud takes place at the front end of the process because the main source of( provable at this point) is the illegal and fraudulent ballots that were accepted, especially in the mail in voting
Good point. I bet they’ve removed all the fraud votes, but unless they managed to replace them with credible replacements... the numbers will tell the tale.
They won’t be able to cover this up. It is not just a recount. What is happening is about 6 steps beyond a basic recount. That is why it will take 43 days.
They are looking for evidence that mailed ballots were put through postal machines. This can, evidently be seen with a low power microscope. It would be difficult to fake that, or the postal franking.
If they change the machines, the totals will not match the ballots. They couldn’t really change the ballots as they were in a warehouse under video surveillance and it would be a huge job.
They can also look at ballots microscopically and determine if it was fed through the tally machine multiple times.
They are also matching signatures (I think) and checking for dead, duplicate or nonexistent voters.
The ballots have a serial number, those are being checked for duplicates, or numbers out side the range that were printed.
Each ballot should, for example have at least two, probably three or four distinct sets of finger prints; the voter, and one or two vote processors from election night. You’d expect the second two to be on many ballots. But, if you have say 1000 from an unidentified person, you have fraud. The way a ballot was handled when being filled out would differ from the way it was fed through the machine so discerning the who was who is easy. Additionally they could get finger prints of the processors to rule them out. If you have ballots with only one set of prints, it is fraudulent. (I do not know if they are going this far.)
They are looking for photocopies, wrong paper weight, wrong font, missing watermarks, mechanically filled in ballots, and type of paper, if those are wrong. there is fraud as the real ballots were printed by known printers on certain paper stocks.
All of those things would be extremely difficult to fake or change. The better option for the dems would have been to shred everything cry foul like they did in Georgia.
This is either going to bring down the democrats or the republicans.
thanks for all the info; very encouraging that we have a chance at really hearing the truth soon.
Good to hear.
I am sure it was major fraud.
If they find after all this that there was not, I will accept it.
What I wonder is what is our remedy. Suppose it’s proven that major fraud occurred here and in Georgia and in Michigan. Does Biden get removed and Trump installed? That would be the only fair thing
I wonder if they can identify a faked ballot, such as ballots completed by someone at the election counting center. This appeared on video at one of the eastern state centers.
The ballots that were delivered from Long Island to Pennsylvania and described by the truck driver who came forward—were those blanks or completed ballots? How might those be id’d?
I do hope this audit contributes to a better voting system. I wonder if the Dem opposition to the audit is to avoid detection of fraud in Ariz or to slow the process so fraud cannot be detected in the states where it was most sloppily conducted, or where ballots were destroyed and can’t be recreated?
“Does Biden get removed and Trump installed? That would be the only fair thing”
Pure speculation, but this is what I think. None of the disputed states sent alternate sets of electors that would have allowed Mike Pence to choose between them. If that had happened, maybe President Hairass and VP Bidet are replaced. But, I could see how the Supreme court said, “Well those electors were accepted in good faith, there is no constitutional provision for a redo so there is nothing we can do.”
However, members of the house and senate are elected directly. If it can be shown that some of those races were run by republicans, I can see those people being replaced. The democrats have a two seat majority in the house and the senate is 50/50 If as a result of these efforts the republicans pick up, say, 5 members of the house and 3 senators, it is a huge deal. That is sort of what I am hoping for. I can see that happening.
Eminently doable. Any citizen should be able to link in to a camera at ANY vote-counting location and watch the doings, and all of that counting and ballot-handling should be recorded in real time, as well.
“I wonder if they can identify a faked ballot, such as ballots completed by someone at the election counting center. This appeared on video at one of the eastern state centers.”
If the ballots were supposed to go through the USPS mail processing system, yes, they can tell if it did not. You can, under relatively low magnification, see the indentations of the rollers.
BTW, my MLIS is in rare books & archives. I am trained as a preservation librarian. I am not a complete expert in what they are doing in Arizona, but I know something about this, it is a related field.
thanks
Ballot bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.