Posted on 04/19/2021 7:21:54 AM PDT by GIdget2004
Several months ago Mark Levin stated that the SC had not held one evidentiary hearing on this subject, not one. And, I don't believe, since he stated that, that there has been a hearing of the evidence by the SC.
I remember when the Attorneys General of several States petitioned the Court, they were told that they did not have standing. My reaction was, if duly elected AGs of different States do not have standing, does anyone have standing? Obviously, not We the People.
The Supreme Court appears to be as corrupt and biased as the political branch.
“We know Robert’s the weasel sides with Dems”
We can now safely state that Roberts does not “side” with the anti-Constitutionalists, he*is* an anti-Constitutionalist. We can usually count on Thomas and Alito, and one of The Donald’s picks. We never know in advance which one.
Alito
He issued an injunction but it was ignored
The Court declined to hear the case. It only takes 4 votes to hear a case, but the order has no dissents listed.
Nope, 9-0.
The Court declined to hear the case. It only takes 4 votes to hear a case, but the order has no dissents listed.
.........
Thanks for that clarification. Wonder if they vote independently or in person and read the tea leaves as things progress. In other words it’s not worth dissenting
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.