Data? You want data? The WSJ reports that blood clots are ten times more likely in those who’ve had COVID than those who’ve been vaccinated.
“Review by Oxford shows risk of rare, serious blood clotting is eight to 10 times greater in people who caught the coronavirus than among people who received any of the first three Western-developed vaccines”
So, does that mean IF you’ve already HAD THE VIRUS, but were asymptomatic and didn’t know you had it, then get a vaccine, in this case J&J, that your blood clotting is a reaction to the vaccine?..................
Makes some intuitive sense. If you get full-blown China Coof, it is serious. If you get a vaccine, it has it's own issues.
"They cautioned, however, against putting too much stock in the specific findings of the relative risks of Covid-infected and general populations or varying risks among vaccines. They said the data used was too limited for statistically valid comparisons of CVT occurrence among recipients of different vaccines or with the general population. The Oxford scientists said other limits of the data include the rarity of the clotting in all groups and the inclusion of children in the U.S. data set. The data review also didn’t shed light on the cause of clots or mechanisms in the virus or vaccines that might overlap or contribute to clots.
“The issue is the lack of credible evidence to support the anti-vaxxer propaganda. BTW, have you noticed that almost all the anti-vaxxer propaganda comes from videos? If they had credible evidence, they would be quoting peer reviewed medical journals.”
But you’re quoting The Wall Street Journal. LOL.