" 
Posted on 04/16/2021 12:03:26 PM PDT by Red Badger
For your interest.
Why anyone believes any of the “Pandemic/Vaccine” data presented by any government agency or resource is beyond me.
None of them can be trusted. Not a one.
You either are an idiot or have an agenda if you are presenting data from a Government Agency on anything COVID related as the basis of your argument.
the same reason it is hard to evaluate any new drug, the manufactures want to make money.
In this case lots of money is at stake, and collateral damage is acceptable.
They have all been linked to clotting disorder ( one of the earliest widely reported was the death of a Dr in FL who took the Pfizer)...and developed symptoms in 3 days
But only JnJ is being targeted
wow thanks!
None of these concerns would matter if COVID were a truly dangerous disease like smallpox or Spanish Flu. When these diseases were rampant, people gladly assumed vaccine risks.
Data? You want data? The WSJ reports that blood clots are ten times more likely in those who’ve had COVID than those who’ve been vaccinated.
“Review by Oxford shows risk of rare, serious blood clotting is eight to 10 times greater in people who caught the coronavirus than among people who received any of the first three Western-developed vaccines”
2 reasons. The facts say ONE thing BUT the money says another.
So, does that mean IF you’ve already HAD THE VIRUS, but were asymptomatic and didn’t know you had it, then get a vaccine, in this case J&J, that your blood clotting is a reaction to the vaccine?..................
Makes some intuitive sense. If you get full-blown China Coof, it is serious. If you get a vaccine, it has it's own issues.
"They cautioned, however, against putting too much stock in the specific findings of the relative risks of Covid-infected and general populations or varying risks among vaccines. They said the data used was too limited for statistically valid comparisons of CVT occurrence among recipients of different vaccines or with the general population. The Oxford scientists said other limits of the data include the rarity of the clotting in all groups and the inclusion of children in the U.S. data set. The data review also didn’t shed light on the cause of clots or mechanisms in the virus or vaccines that might overlap or contribute to clots.
Red Badger wrote: “So, does that mean IF you’ve already HAD THE VIRUS, but were asymptomatic and didn’t know you had it, then get a vaccine, in this case J&J, that your blood clotting is a reaction to the vaccine?..................”
It means that blood clots are ten times more likely in those who’ve had COVID than those who’ve been vaccinated.
Yes, and if you get the vax, it’s probably 10X THAT!...............
What would it take to get Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the FDA for HCQ and Ivermectin?
rhetorical
Big Brother wants mRNA delivery.
Because they don’t want us to know the truth.
A Red Sea sized miracle.
"
Why is it so hard to find what is in the $1.9 T bill?
Why is it so hard to find what is in the $1.9 T bill?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.