Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karliner

“This was no accident,” the statement said. “This was an intentional, deliberate, and unlawful use of force.”

From the family’s lawyer. Scum bag.


7 posted on 04/14/2021 12:29:30 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ChicagoConservative27

If that’s the bar he wants the defense to find reasonable doubt for, so be it.


30 posted on 04/14/2021 12:42:22 PM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Scumbag is right.

The authorities have given these folks so much rope, they’ve
got plenty enough to hang all of us with it.

This is unquestionably a fatal error, but the idea she
intended to kill this guy doesn’t pass the sniff test.

I’ve seen former officers talk about just hitting the target
under pressure situations. Under pressure, their mind didn’t
always work as efficiently as they had hoped for.

I think that dynamic was in play here.

I can’t imagine picking the gun rather than the taser, but
I’m not convinced it couldn’t happen.

For all the talk of what officers should or shouldn’t do
in these situations, I don’t see/hear any talk about what
suspects could do to contribute to their own safety.

They own part of the responsibility for their own death,
but not the media, the families, or BLM types pick up
on the idea that compliance is the best chance of
survival.

Too bad really...


38 posted on 04/14/2021 12:50:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Folks, if you haven't yet, please start an automatic monthly for Jim and his crew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson