Posted on 04/12/2021 12:26:59 PM PDT by Red Badger
Catholic leaders in the state of Michigan are warning the public that Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines are made from the tissue of dead, mutilated fetuses.
Archbishop Allen H. Vigneron and a coalition of six other Catholic leaders throughout the state have been sounding the alarm about these vaccines. They are demanding for public officials to be honest and transparent with the public about the troubling origin of these experimental vaccines.
“It is morally permissible to receive the vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna. Neither of these vaccines have used cell lines originating in tissue taken from aborted babies in their design, development and production,” a statement from the regional Catholic church stated.
“However, both the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccine did use such a cell line in the confirmatory testing. This connection to the abortion is very remote, however, and it is important to keep in mind that there are varying levels of responsibility. Greater moral responsibility lies with the researchers than with those who receive the vaccine,” they added.
The church noted that other vaccine researchers, such as Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, are using the chopped up fetal parts more directly in synthesizing their vaccines, and this is becomes untenable from a moral perspective.
“The vaccines developed by Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca are more morally problematic, however. They utilized in the design, production, development, and confirmatory testing a cell line that originated from tissue taken from an aborted baby. These vaccines may be received only if there are no other alternatives,” the church wrote.
Big League Politics has reported about the many negative side-effects from these vaccines that were rushed into production at warp speed:
“Facebook fact-checked a woman’s post about her adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine one week before she unexpectedly passed away.
Desiree Penrod complained of multiple side effects on the evening of March 10: “The vaccine is killing me today. My arm hurts, beyond exhausted, headache, stomach cramps and earaches. Multiple people told me that I looked pale today. Yesterday, I was fine but today it’s taking a toll on me.”
Facebook then had the chutzpah to tag her post with the following disclaimer: “COVID-19 vaccines go through many tests for safety and effectiveness before they’re approved. Source: World Health Organization.”
… As of this writing there are nearly 1,500 comments on Penrod’s post. Many commenters have expressed their condolences while some are at each other’s throats over whether or not the vaccine side effects killed her.
Penrod’s obituary states that she passed away at home “unexpectedly” on March 17. She was only 25 years old and had been working as a preschool teacher.”
The actual long term effects of these shots will not be known for years, and Big Pharma will have already soaked up trillions and possess immunity from liability for whatever those effects may be. In this way, the globalist system is rigged and represents a far bigger threat to public well being than any virus.
Ping!
Is it true? I have no idea. But many people seem to believe it.
I have friends who believe that as well; from aborted fetus’ that were stored from the late 1960’s:https://www.cga.ct.gov/2020/PHdata/Tmy/2020HB-05044-R000219-Wrinn%2015,%20Chris-TMY.PDF
It’s nonsense.
Red Badger wrote: “If true, this is a game changer for me...............”
BS! You’ve been against these vaccines from the git-go.
Not really, I HAVE to get one or the other. Now It’s looking like Moderna is the only one left....................
Little late for the warning, but ok. I doubt the “vaccine” takers care anyway.
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
For your interest.
It’s the chimpanzee-origin factor that I find strange about the Astrazeneca viral vector.
We need more Catholic minded virologists and epidemiologists etc...Can’t just be in the sidelines critiquing science.
“It’s nonsense.”
It’s nonsense if someone says there are aborted baby parts in the vaccines. There aren’t. It’s most certainly NOT nonsense to say that the fetal cell lines were used in the development, testing, and production of some of the vaccines. Read the company’s own reports. The lines are referenced extensively. The only covid vaccine I’m comfortable with for that reason is NovaVax, not a go yet but soon. Novavax came up with a clever way to use insect cells instead.
Thanks so much - see post 11.
And what I’ve read, the J&J vaccine has many problems. The revenge of the babies? My physician said it’s not true, but offered nothing to support his statement.
“ Novavax came up with a clever way to use insect cells instead.
But then you grow 4 extra legs and antenna… so there’s that.
From what I’ve read, this is true. J&J don’t deny it. Not sure about AstraZeneca.
Red Badger wrote: “Not really, I HAVE to get one or the other. Now It’s looking like Moderna is the only one left....................”
My apologies, i must have confused you with another Badger.
“It!s nonsense if someone says there are aborted baby parts in the vaccines. There aren’t.”
Yes, which is what the headline says.
“It’s most certainly NOT nonsense to say that the fetal cell lines were used in the development, testing, and production of some of the vaccines.”
Yes, this is also true.
What is also nonsense is saying two vaccines are ok but one is not when all three used the HEK cell line.
> If true, this is a game changer for me... <
I struggle with this as well.
If the J&J vaccine uses cell lines from many aborted children, that’s one thing. But if they’re using just one cell line from one long-ago aborted baby, that’s another thing. (And why was that baby aborted in the first place? That matters to me. Was it a desperate attempt to save the life of the mother? Or was it just because the mother didn’t want another child?)
From what I’ve read, the J&J vaccine is safer than the alternatives. I’m a “What Would Jesus Do?” kind of guy (seriously). Would Jesus say take a riskier vaccine to avoid the cell line issue? We must each decide that question for ourselves.
And here’s something else to consider. Suppose a medical breakthrough was accomplished through horrific experiments conducted on concentration camp prisoners. Should such a breakthrough be shunned because of its origins? Again, we must each decide that question for ourselves.
60s - 80s. There is reason to believe that they continue development using current and continuous supplies. However even if they were only from the 60s-80s, doesn’t that make Baby Sourdough? Cells continually harvested from the original hundreds of abortions? Does this make it any less wrong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.