Posted on 04/10/2021 11:11:44 AM PDT by rktman
On May 4, 1989, Ehrlich warned of "rapid" climate change, that "we could expect to lose all of Florida, Washington D.C., and much of the Los Angeles Basin....We'll be in rising waters with no ark in sight."
They repeated this disaster-movie routine on Jan. 11, 1990. Ehrlich claimed that when the ice sheet melts in Antarctica, the sea level would rise "not...1 to 3 feet in a century but...10 or 20 feet in a much shorter time." He added: "The Supreme Court would be flooded. You could tie your boat to the Washington Monument. And storm surges would make the Capitol unusable."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
Big Tech Gestapo won’t allow Scientific proof to enter the stage.
Checklist for the most accurate climate forecast:
1. Read/listen to ANY media outlet for their latest climate change disaster prediction.
2. Send it to the patented “real science word inverter”
3. Voila, dat’s watz gonna happen!
Always remember the only source for funding climate change research - the corrupt, science inept and slovenly collection of congresscritters who are mostly failed lawyers.
And the altered data and the models that have not worked.
“The Supreme Court would be flooded. You could tie your boat to the Washington Monument. And storm surges would make the Capitol unusable.”
Ridiculous statement, but if this did happen, I’m seeing a downside of the Capitol being unusable.
I’m seeing = I’m NOT seeing
The Court(s) Are Flooded ... with Kangaroos.
You can tie up to the Washington Monument, as the Antifa Barge does so floating on decomposing Criminals of Color.
And the Storm Surges of the Pelosi False Flag January Sixth "Riots" have made the Capitol Unusable to Americans, but not Communist Chinese.
I sternly told him to tell his people to keep the damn dyno turning in the river and concentrate on maintaining the power lines and quit playing leftist extortion racket games by recruiting useful idiots like you to call me with this save the world crap....and hung up
I cannot source this but I read an article just recently that a study of the Sahara Desert showed that the Sahara had actually shrunken by 100,000 square kilometers in the last 30 years and the reasoning was that plant growth in the shrunken areas had expanded due to higher carbon levels in the atmosphere as plants grow better when they have more carbon available to them.
Sounds like someone is begging to be cancelled. :-) “How Dare You!?”
The alarmists under estimate (1) LIFE writ large, to adapt, and (2) human ability in this age to (a) mitigate and (b) adapt. The alarmists also overstate just what on their predictions would change in the human lifetimes of the next 100 200 years, if the most massive “green” changes were done now. The answer to that last point is massive “green” changes soon will do very little over the next 100 to 200 years, by the same science the alarmists use, which is concentrated on how long CO2 lasts in the atmosphere. That part in their “models” calculates the CO2 in the atmosphere and what CO2 additions to the atmosphere would be under various CO2 reduction scenarios. And, under the “best scenarios” (most CO2 restrictive) CO2 in the atmosphere will continue to increase and not move in a decreasing direction for the next 100 to 200 years. Can their own “solutions” stop “the warming” ten generations? No.
But what if over the next ten generations human investment went to adapting to and mitigating “climate change” instead of chasing CO2? We’d be ahead of the game no matter what happened. And if instead human investment was poured into “solutions” that won’t stop “the warming”? We will be poorer, not adapted and suffering for real solutions we have not produced, because our economy was instead spent (made more costly) chasing CO2.
To put a thousand yard stare/deer in the headlights look on a climageddonists face, simply posit the following:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
“How Dare You!?”
Hey, we haven’t heard from Greta in a while.
What’s the little freak up to?
That first wave of climate hysteria began to fade when nature showed that it wasn’t going to be that easy to melt down large ice caps, just because the mid-latitudes were getting a bit warmer. The circulation began to respond to that change in ways that had not been foreseen. Still, the overall question remains on the table, will the greenhouse gas increase eventually lead to this result, or will other factors lead to a different outcome? I think in reality we have no reliable answers. Long term the carbon dioxide increase may end up being in our favour, if the natural climate begins to cool towards glacial levels. The trick will be to maintain those increases at a safe level so as not to tilt the balance too far towards warming. I don’t look at it as an emergency or a crisis, more like a challenge, and one we should be able to meet with reasonable efforts.
As I understand it they want to finance a lot of this by offloading residential loans for solar panels etc with Pace financing, which could be a complete subprime disaster. That might not be a bad avenue for attack.
When dictator Joe runs out of reasons to lock down because of Covid-19 there’s a good chance he will use climate change or gun control and the health epidemic BS to continue his unconstitutional power grab.
Apparently she is not going to some climate summit. Heard over viewpoints but actually someone balked at her compensation demand. Butt, the less 🐎💩 from her, the better. 😂🙌
I thought they were getting to convince us it was bad and should be avoided?
To this very day, some are still making the same old horse sh** predictions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.