Posted on 04/03/2021 3:32:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
You seem to be advocating murder.
Are you advocating murder?
LOL to your last statement!
You are correct that not all of them have a correlation of 1.000 that is my error, not theirs. They did not claim that all of the were that I am aware of.
I was referring to have a correlation in one county that approached +1.000 across all age groups
Who said any of that made-up bullshit?
Answer the question.
What does any of this "exposure" actually DO?
Of course it was stolen...as have dozens of other local, state and federal elections the last 40 years.
The “image’ of the Left as an honest political wing in the USA has been driven by the media.
Since 1984 the control of media outlets has dropped from over 50 different organizations to just 6 today. The product of that consolidation is an ILLUSION of a “powerful Left wing”, a manufactured progressive consensus that has usurped political power it has no business with honestly. “honest” votes for Biden/the Left were 30-35 million. At most.
The problems originate in corrupted, local electoral precincts in deep Blue urban centers. These NEED to be cleaned. Nobody desires the dirty job. Part of “redistricting” projects, BTW, is to create regions and social environments permitting unfettered and unhindered electoral Fraud.
Think parts of cities where Republicans fear to tread. No bipartisan voting observers. If any Republican observers, or even voters show up,they are threatened. This is the beginning process of turning a Red state Purple.
This article provides a glimpse into exactly this process going on in Philadelphia in 2009
https://www.heritage.org/commentary/voter-intimidation-new-black-panther-style
There are more of “us” than “them” A whole lot more
Its all kayfabe. Its what they want you to believe, its what they want you to “feel”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayfabe
What the left has done, ever since the 1984 Reagan-Mondale blowout - (and Mondale was a “moderate” Democrat!) - is to start electoral fraud programs in the largest states to turn them from Red-to-Purple-to Blue. They realized they had no future otherwise. It started in California and New York.
This last election cycle local Texans managed to turn it around at the precinct level-their RINO Governor not withstanding.
Extreme involvement in your local precincts and making sure paper balloting on ELECTION DAY, with hand counts and recounts in a transparent fashion and setting with open audit trails available to the general public, among other measures-are key.
Its dirty, tough work and initially confrontational with the existing perps. As the above article illustrates, it will be dangerous. But it beats the heck outta the alternatives -which are bearing down like a runaway freight train
The left has focused on corrupting our local electoral process. They focus on the deep urban centers. This process of corruption is very active presently in Georgia, using Atlanta as its base, the last 2 election cycles. This process is seditious.
We the People have no future otherwise. These people INTEND to “rule”
The benefits of this process created the UniParty which is WHY this has been allowed to mature.
The bias is the ballot manufacturing that came after the election.
That bias.
Ballots were processed without adequate or in come cases any supervision in several states. That included creating new ballots from old ballots that (allegedly) could not be read. That all happened after the election. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were processed after the election overwhelmingly in favor of Biden. That was planned and planned to be cover for the fraud.
There's no need to dream up a biased algorithm, which according to your new theory, was only triggered after the election. The prior drivel from the MIT guy and the physics guy was that the algorithm bias took place during the election. Those were junk so now you nvented a new algorithm, one triggered after the polls close. Of course an algorithm could easily access and use the date. But the counting fraud has a simpler explanation.
The algorithm bias theory serves three simple purposes: make convervatives look stupid, distract from the actual fraud, and enrich voting machine companies in their lawsuits. How are we going to stop midnight ballot alterations? How are we going to securely mark ballots to stop fabrication? How are we going to stop harvesting, bribing, threats, signature forging, non-postmarked ballots, and worst of all, bureaucrats and judges illegally changing the rules?
In your world, we're not. We'll simply accuse the voting machine companies, without evidence, of biased counting and let all that other stuff continue. Because of course it had to be the algorithm.
You don’t even know who you’re talking at.
That’s what you’re doing and it’s fallacious.
I never said Election Theft 2020 was based on any computer ballot theft.
SMH
Great I'm glad we agree.
What good does this do??
There is certainly reason for your skepticism, but my answer is that the American people have a right to know the truth and I sincerely believe that when a critical mass is achieved real change/reform will happen.
Hey TGurl!
This was the factor that Trump himself could not get his head around. I am not on the inside of any of this but what I expect them to answer is that Trump’s numbers were huge, the algorithm only needed to be enough. Was this the only problem you saw in it?
Follow up later.
*
You are correct here. We have an additional data point that shows this as well.
Florida.
Florida typically is the swing States of all Swing States. However, since 2000, Florida has enacted very strict controls on their elections, including some of the best controls in the nation on mail-in ballots.
If the Democrats could have rigged Florida for Biden, AZ, WI, PA and GA wouldn’t have mattered.
If Trump won AZ, WI, PA and GA, but lost Florida, Biden would still have had 278 electoral votes.
Yet Florida wasn’t rigged. Why? Because of the stringent controls on the absentee and mail-in ballots.
In AZ, GA, WI and PA the controls were systematically destroyed. In GA it was by a consent decree. In Pennsylvania, it was done by the PA Supreme Court.
Morons keep chasing the machines when the data doesn’t support that line. The mail-in balloting is where the action is.
*
They don’t count because they’ve sold their souls.
I was talking about you and humptygummer.
“What does any of this ‘exposure’ actually DO?”
What does anything actually do?
Why do you post on this website?
Why do you draw your next breath?
Why do you even bother to think?
At least one of us is in good company.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.