Posted on 04/01/2021 11:46:31 AM PDT by Hojczyk
The entire video has been analyzed by George Parry, a former chief of the police Brutality/Misconduct Unit of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office from 1978 to 1983.
It was at that point Officer Chauvin begins to kneel on Mr. Floyd’s neck, which Mr. Parry says, “is entirely consistent with what is taught” at the Minneapolis police department academy.
The video shows Mr. Chauvin’s knee going up each time Floyd attempted to raise his head, indicating, says Mr. Parry, that Mr. Chauvin “was not using brute force.” When officers noticed Floyd deteriorating “they placed another call for an ambulance” with a higher priority code. When it arrived, Floyd appears to have stopped breathing.
The Hennepin County medical examiner determined that Floyd had a “fatal level” of fentanyl in his system. The report also found that “Floyd had a ‘heavy heart’ and ‘at least one artery was approximately 75 percent blocked.’” Floyd also had a history of severe coronary artery disease and hypertension, which, along with the drug and his agitated behavior, likely contributed to his death. Mr. Parry claims prosecutors withheld this information for nearly three months as riots erupted in Minneapolis and elsewhere. Such behavior is normally considered prosecutorial misconduct.
Watch the video, read the medical examiner’s documents and see how the original narrative was wrong. Will jurors succumb to political pressure and the threat of more rioting, or will they examine the entire video and make their decision based on evidence?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I think they see a knee on a person’s neck and decide they have all the information they need.
There is no such thing as ‘context’ anymore; every phrase and every single image can take on any meaning regardless of what else caused or explains it.
If you have care, custody, or control of a person, many courts will hold you liable for anything that happens past that point.
same thing. based on the evidence I am aware of, a not guilty vote. But I would also be taking steps to protect from family.
George Floyd’s toxicology report:
4-ANPP . . . . .65 ng/mL . . . . Blood
11 Hydroxy Delta THC . . . 1.2 ng/mL . . . Blood
Delta 9 Carboxy THC . . . 42 ng/mL . . . Blood
Meth . . . 19 ng/mL . . . Blood
Fentanyl . . . 11 ng/mL . . . Blood
Norfentanyl . . . 5.6 ng/mL . . . Blood
Cannabinoids . . . Positive . . . Urine
Amphetamines . . . Positive . . . Urine
Fentanyl/Metabolite . . . Positive . . . Urine
Morphine - free . . . 86 ng/mL . . . Urine
Other findings:
Floyds lungs were 2-3 times the normal weight. They had filled will fluid as a consequence of fentanyl in his blood.
Floyd’s behavior indicated Excited Delirium Syndrome which puts one in danger of sudden cardiac arrest.
The amount of Fentyanyl to cause an overdose is 3 ng/mL. Floyd had 11 ng/mL which is three times the limit for an overdose
The communists will dox any juror that votes to acquit so the mob can destroy them.
The stupid people promote mob rule and will resort to anarchy to get what they want.
If I were on the jury I would have no hesitation in voting Not Guilty. This whole thing just seems stupid and unnecessary.
.......................................................
Unfortunately you and I aren’t on the jury.
Anybody know the racial composition of the jury?
It matters............... A lot!
I can't breathe...If you're talking, you're breathing.
Floyd was a BIG dude. He's the bad guy...not the cop.
Try and keep the story straight.
Maybe they quietly brought in the OJ jury.
Spot on.
The real prob with the vid of the knee on the neck is that there is no gauge to indicate how much pressure is being applied. That indication is only in the imagination of those seeing it.
Given that NYT is doxxing the jurors, and given that the leftists are threatening violence to intimidate the jury, the jurors may be too scared to render a just verdict.
Where do we go from here?
Under such circumstances is it possible to seat a jury that will not be intimidated and feel threatened?
Look at how or Supreme Court avoided their duty in connection with voter integrity issues for the swing states to avoid the wrath of the left.
But the chief prosecutor is MN AG Keith Ellison, so you know that he will not be criticized because he is a black Dem pol. They can do no wrong in the newsmedia's eyes.
The issue is never the issue.....
IIRC "with prejudice" means that the prosecutor isn't allowed to take the case to trial again.
It makes no difference what verdict is reached, Minneapolis will again be burning. Even conviction on the second degree murder charge will be used as proof there is systematic racism and an excuse to riot, loot and burn. Conviction on lesser charges will be the catalyst for rioting and heaven forbid an acquittal..
Minneapolis will be a combat zone. The milquetoast mayor of Minneapolis and our feckless Governor will let the rioters run amuck just like last year and certainly Biden will just blame white supremacists and do nothing.
Bookmark
Probably.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.