I’m confused as to just what the controversy is.....
Some think it relays a message that blacks can’t get up the ladder without white help.
They’re leftists. They think a Black entrepreneur is a bad role model and part of “the problem.”
Any traditionally white institution, founded by whites, can never be sufficiently “woke” to systemic racism.
Only the members of BLM can fix them.
Here are our demands:
1. No descendant of the African slave trade (Irish honkies are EXCLUDED) will need to comnplete an admission application or test.
2. No descendant of the African slave trade will be required to register for or attend any classes.
3. An on-campus residency will be provided, free of charges. As will meals.
4. Music students and student athletes will get a per diem (to be determined by the student) paid daily in cash.
5. All descendants of the African slave trade are either athletes or music students.
6. Students will determine their graduation date.
7. Students will assign their Pass/Fail grades and determine their degree level, regardless of the handbook definitions.
Apparently, this activist group objected to the idea that black people could be rescued by white people:
“The video promotes the ideology of white saviorsim [sic], white supremacy and most of all a lack of addressing structural racism!” the page said.
::::::::::::::
I am guessing some “saviorsim” is needed to help these dolts learn English. Apparently, their instruction in rhetoric and composition ended after second grade.
As for Loyola, it’s heartbreaking to see what it has become. I know people
who graduated from there when it was a fine school.