[NELSON111]

Bovine scat. They went before numerous judges. Look it up. Rudy himself and other Trump lawyers told judges “this is not a fraud case”. Look that up. Stop with your delusion.

[RoosterRedux]

What delusion would that be?

IIRC, not a single court allowed this to go to trial so that Sidney or Lin could present evidence.

I am in a Georgia county as I said upthread which reran the vote count and found that the machines over counted for Biden. My county refused to certify the results, accordingly.

[RoosterRedux]

BTW, I don't think all the proposed cases were fraud-based. Some were arguing that certain Secretaries of State had taken action not permitted under current law or the Constitution and that action rendered the election results null and void.

That's not fraud if I understand it correctly.

[romanesq]

“Rudy himself and other Trump lawyers told judges “this is not a fraud case”.

That’s a legal point and a strategy as Rudy didn’t think a court would dig into the issue of any election fraud as that’s the history of most courts.

The time constraints are short and Rudy correctly knew that was not going to work. That was the point he made in Pennsylvania.

Not that there was not major election fraud but that this point would not be tackled by a judge so they used other arguments to focus on the illegality of how the election in PA was run.

[RoosterRedux]

Why does it bother you that some people hold the opinion that the election was stolen?

Just curious.

[lepton]

Look it up. Rudy himself and other Trump lawyers told judges “this is not a fraud case”. Look that up.

---

You’re referring to the equal protection case in PA...which wasn’t a fraud case.

The point of the particular case was that just the differences in how ballots were processed shifted the relative vote total compared to what they would have been if all counties used the (same) legal standard for accepting ballots. A claim of fraud in that case would just muddy the waters.