Look it up. Rudy himself and other Trump lawyers told judges “this is not a fraud case”. Look that up.
The point of the particular case was that just the differences in how ballots were processed shifted the relative vote total compared to what they would have been if all counties used the (same) legal standard for accepting ballots. A claim of fraud in that case would just muddy the waters.
Actually, I did a little research.
I found a list of the suits filed by the Trump Campaign (or their advocates) in each state (up to a certain date) and was looking for what happened with them. (I’m still trying to find the website I was looking at.)
Anyway, they listed 41 court challenges and of those 4 were for “standing” and 5 were for “laches,” and one case was dismissed because of both of those reasons.
Numerous cases came up with these rulings:
“strained legal arguments” PA
“no wrong doing” NV
“evidence of little to no value to change results” NV
“no evidence” GA
“no basis in fact or law” GA
“no proof” MI — 3 of these
“defendent gave more accurate testimony” MI
“no proof” AZ
“failed to present any evidence of misconduct/illegal votes” AZ
“no proof of hacking” AZ
“little basis in fact” WI
“full of falsehoods” WI
“full of errors” WI
**********
And a few were withdrawn by the plaintiffs
It seems to me that the legal arguments and/or proof were not presented very well.