Remove God, remove meaning, and the search for feeling important, regardless of truth, consumes the individual.
Case in point, the sainted Anthony Fauci (PBUH - Poop Be Upon His Head)
Posted on 03/16/2021 4:13:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
If one were to draw up a list of human needs, food and shelter would be at the top.
With great respect to Freudians, sex would not be No. 2.
The need for meaning would be second only to the need for food.
That meaning is more important to happiness than sex is easily shown. A great many people go long periods without sex, and while many of them miss it, if they have meaning in their lives, they can lead quite happy and fulfilling lives. On the other hand, few people who have regular sex but lack meaning are happy or fulfilled.
Third on the list of human needs is the need to feel important. This need is much less often cited than the need for food, sex and meaning. But it is so important that a case could be made that it is tied for No. 2 with the need for meaning.
The infamous "midlife crisis" is a crisis of importance: "I thought I would be much more important at this stage in life than I am." That mostly afflicts men -- just as feeling less important after one's children have left home afflicts mothers more than fathers.
Among the many psycho-social crises afflicting Americans is a crisis of importance. Fewer Americans feel important than did Americans in the past.
Why? What has happened?
What has happened is a steep decline in the number of institutions that gave people a feeling of importance.
Given that work is generally regarded as one of the most ubiquitous providers of purpose, and that, prior to the COVID-19 lockdown, more Americans were working than ever before, one would think that more Americans than ever before felt important.
It has not turned out that way. For many, work has not provided the sense of importance people expected it to, let alone fulfilled the other great need: for meaning. This is especially true for women, but first, we will address men.
Work used to provide many men with a sense of importance. It is simply a fact that being the breadwinner for a family means one is important. However, since the 1970s and the rise of feminism, women have not only become breadwinners, but they have increasingly become the primary breadwinner within a marriage and for a family. That has helped couples financially, but it has also deprived a great many men of their sense of importance. When regarded by a wife and children as important, husbands/fathers felt important. Progressive America mocks the 1950s TV series "Father Knows Best." But when wives and children believed that, men felt important because they were. The price for this, according to feminism, was paid by women, who didn't receive the accolades of breadwinning. And they set about changing it.
However, contrary to the expectations of the well-educated, women becoming breadwinners has not provided most women with a sense of importance, and certainly not meaning in life. Contrary to what feminism, colleges, high schools, progressive parents and the mass media have claimed for decades, men and women do not have the same natures. Just as sex with many partners does not provide most women with the same satisfaction it provides men, most work does not provide women with the same sense of importance or meaning it provides men. For many women, being the breadwinner is financially beneficial but not especially satisfying. Most women would still like their man to be the primary breadwinner. That's why very wealthy women so often marry even wealthier men. It is built into female nature.
Moreover, throughout history, work was rarely seen as a primary provider of importance or meaning -- for either sex. Work was little more than a necessity, and the vast majority of people would have happily abandoned their often back-breaking, drudgery-inducing work if they could afford to.
For the most part, people sought -- and found -- importance and meaning outside of work. This was especially true in America, where "associations" provided both importance and meaning.
Nongovernmental associations, as Alexis de Tocqueville noted in his brilliant analysis of American life in the early 19th century, was the key to Americans' success and happiness. These included, first and foremost, religious associations and religion in general. Most religious people feel important -- to God, to their community, to their family. My father was the president of our synagogue, and my mother was active in the synagogue's "sisterhood." Though both worked full time, those roles provided them with immense meaning and sense of importance.
Add to that: Rotary, Kiwanis and Lions clubs; book clubs; the Masons; bowling leagues; coaching Little League; volunteer charitable work; teaching Bible in Sunday school. These provided people with a sense of importance.
The key to all these associations was their being independent of government. As government has grown, nearly all these associations have shrunk. Therefore, we have a rule: The more government intrudes in people's lives, the less important most people feel -- unless they work for the government.
Yet, to progressives, government is, or should be, almost everything in people's lives. It should take care of as many people as possible. However, at a massive price: The more one relies on the government, the more one will inevitably lack a sense of importance.
This ideal was announced at the 2012 Democratic Party Convention, when the narrator of a specially-created Barack Obama campaign-theme video asserted, "Government is the only thing that we all belong to." The DNC also showed a fictional storybook ad titled "The Life of Julia." It portrayed a woman from childhood to old age, wholly dependent on the government. Despite her having a child, there was not a man anywhere in the story, nor, apparently, was there a man in her life. The result? More and more American women have come to rely on the government, not on a husband. The results have been calamitous.
resident Joe Biden repeated this theme last week: "Put trust and faith in our government," he pleaded with Americans. One could accurately say that we are replacing America's motto, "In God We Trust," with, "In Government We Trust."
The bigger the government, the fewer the institutions in which people can feel important. Therefore, given the deep human need to feel important, people will look elsewhere for their importance -- like fighting systemic racism, heteronormativity, capitalism, patriarchy and transphobia. And, most of all, global warming -- because you cannot feel more important than when you believe you are saving the world.
Government is part of the problem.
I also think media contributes. Heck, everyone on TV and in movies lives in a big house, and works in super fancy offices. They all have really active social lives, hanging out in classy bars, driving hot cars, and having adventures. And everyone I know on social media is always talking about their great vacations, and wonderful accomplishments. How come my life isn’t anything like that?? I just trudge through my day doing boring stuff. I’m such a failure.
I think this sort of feeling eats at a lot of people. It’s jealousy, covetousness. Very human. Modern technology amplifies a failing that has always been with us.
Remove God, remove meaning.
people that need to “feel important” are feeding their ego.
Most folks i know have an inflated sense of self anyhow.
Prager is an idiot. The need to “feel important” ??? You have to be kidding me.
The need to feel important is a big part of why America is on the brink of destruction. We are drowning in egotism and narcissism, the relentless need to feel important.
The rest of what Prager says is entirely lost in his highly distorted analysis.
People with character and integrity have character and integrity under any and all circumstances, especially difficult circumstances.
But Prager needed to feel important, so he wrote a dim-witted article which is based on the same premise as the worst propagandistic and cultural garbage forced on us daily.
I think he chose the wrong word with “important”; “valued” would be a better choice. Otherwise, he is spot on.
Remove God, remove meaning, and the search for feeling important, regardless of truth, consumes the individual.
Case in point, the sainted Anthony Fauci (PBUH - Poop Be Upon His Head)
“Prager is an idiot...”
Prager’s thoughts seem more logical to me than citing rampant egotism and narcissism to refute his claim that the need to feel important is a fundamental need of all people.
I did not cite rampant egotism and narcissism to “refute” Prager’s claim. I cited it as evidence of how idiotic Prager is.
How is what you said evidence that Prager, not you, is an idiot?
.
To the left, nothing matters but sex. Everything they do revolves around what they want to do with their privates. It is an absolute obsession. You would think it was the only toy they had to play with.
Well said. Remove God and He might hide His face and leave you to your own devices. All of this wealth that people think they have is an illusion. It never brings true peace.
Perhaps important is the wrong word. We need to feel that we matter, we count for something,we serve something that matters - our family, our community, we belong.
Actually the deadly sin of vanity is a protective response to not feeling important. It afflicts city dwellers far more than country folks. City dwellers are surrounded 24 hours a day in 3 dimensions by thousands of people more important and wealthier than themselves. Years of unresolved envy turns them into raging Democrats.
Both good and bad, communication technology is bringing city life to the countryside. The good is now country people can work city jobs remotely, and have on demand education, shopping, entertainment, and socializing. The bad is they are now constantly bombarded on social media by exaggerated claims of happiness, wealth, beauty, and success. The worst aspect is the fleeing New Yorkers spreading out across the country like cockroaches.
That’s a key element of Lovecraftian horror. That you’re so small and insignificant you are NOTHING ...
Yes, I too thought it was clear that he was talking about meaningfulness rather than mere celebrity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.