Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Democrats sneak a ‘religious test for redistricting’ into H.R. 1?
https://freedomfirstnetwork.com ^ | March 14, 2021 | JD Rucker

Posted on 03/15/2021 6:29:40 AM PDT by Red Badger

Article VI, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution is abundantly clear. Why did Democrats defy it in their election-rigging bill, H.R. 1?

The “For the People Act,” the much-ballyhooed scheme by Democrats on Capitol Hill to codify the mechanisms through which voter fraud can become ubiquitous, has received plenty of blowback from the political right. Most of us have argued that H.R. 1 creates a perpetual environment that we first saw in 2020 with Covid-19 lockdowns. We argue that the rules made by legislatures, election boards, and the judiciary were unnecessary through the pandemic and therefore should definitely be unnecessary when lockdowns fully end.

But hidden in the bowels of the bill is a hideous provision that requires a “religious test” for those applying to participate in the non-partisan redistricting agency that would be formed if the bill becomes law. This is blatantly unconstitutional and should allow for an easy route for a Constitution-friendly judiciary to strike it down. According to Travis Weber at the Family Research Council:

H.R. 1 requires states to establish a nonpartisan agency in the state legislature. This nonpartisan agency will establish an independent redistricting commission to organize electoral districts.

Section 2412 establishes eligibility criteria to serve on the redistricting commission. Any individual applying to serve on the redistricting commission must provide personal information, including:

The reason or reasons the individual desires to serve on the independent redistricting commission, the individual’s qualifications, and information relevant to the ability of the individual to be fair and impartial, including, but not limited to—

(I) any involvement with, or financial support of, professional, social, political, religious, or community organizations or causes [emphasis added].

While it may appear minor, this is incredibly problematic because it suggests that religious affiliations may affect an individual’s ability to be impartial, and thereby may make them ineligible to serve on the commission. This is not only discriminatory, but also unconstitutional.

Surprisingly, this little nugget of the bill has not received the attention it is due from conservative media. Hopefully, that will change soon as this article and another by Christian Post from yesterday spread. According to Ryan Foley at Christian Post:

While the For the People Act passed the House, where legislation can pass with a simple majority, its future remains uncertain in the Senate, where legislation requires 60 votes to pass. Democrats have a narrow 50-50 majority in the Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris serving as the tie-breaking vote.

In order for the For the People Act to overcome a filibuster, it would need to secure the support of 10 Republicans. Top Senate Democrats have threatened to invoke the so-called “nuclear option” to abolish the filibuster and enable legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority.

Because Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has reaffirmed his support for maintaining the filibuster, Democrats might find themselves unable to accumulate the votes required to abolish the filibuster and pass H.R. 1.

Article VI, Clause 3 states: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” It immediately follows a clause requiring all federal office holders to take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. This clause contains the only explicit reference to religion in the original seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.

H.R. 1 clearly states that religious affiliation and membership in religious organizations and groups must be divulged to participate with the redistricting agency. This is unambiguously unconstitutional. The “For The People Act” must be stopped.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2021 6:29:40 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Why did Democrats sneak a ‘religious test for redistricting’ into H.R. 1?

Because the Demonicrats are traitors to the United States of America and the Constitution.

2 posted on 03/15/2021 6:32:31 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

Democrats are the party of anti-christ.


3 posted on 03/15/2021 6:44:25 AM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse
"Because the Demonicrats are traitors to the United States of America and the Constitution."

BINGO.!! Give that man a cigar.... :)

4 posted on 03/15/2021 6:45:45 AM PDT by unread (A REPUBLIC..! If you can keep it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They lost me at establishing a nonpartisan agency. No such thing, never was, is or will be.
This will force the republicans (if they ever want to win again), to cheat just as much as the rats. True (if ever there was) elections have ceased to exist. Thanks SCOTUS and all the other courts that refused to hear one case.


5 posted on 03/15/2021 6:47:25 AM PDT by GMThrust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

They hate God, Jesus, and anything Jewish or Christian....................................


6 posted on 03/15/2021 6:48:06 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The only hope for the country is the United States Supreme Court. Yet it is doubtful that they will have the courage to rule this abomination unconstitutional.


7 posted on 03/15/2021 6:49:55 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

“Why did Democrats sneak a ‘religious test for redistricting’ into H.R. 1?
Because the Demonicrats are traitors to the United States of America and the Constitution.”

No, because the Democrats hate God and anything that has to do with God.
God is love, therefore Democrats hate God
God is just, and Democrats are unjust
God is fair, and Democrats are unfair
God desires Mercy, Democrats desire sacrifice
God forbids murder, Democrats murder hundreds of unborn babies each day

So, because Democrats hate God, they want to find out of you are affiliated with an organization that loves God, thereby making you ineligible to serve.


8 posted on 03/15/2021 6:52:42 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; ...
Because they can?

9 posted on 03/15/2021 6:52:48 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s all about the queers. The left will purge religion because traditional religion finds queers to be an abomination.


10 posted on 03/15/2021 6:52:50 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Obama said he did not like the Constitution as it is. They are just following his lead.


11 posted on 03/15/2021 6:56:57 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Jane Long; MinuteGal; jsanders2001; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; stephenjohnbanker; ...
This clause contains the only explicit reference to religion in the original seven articles of the U.S. Constitution:
Article VI, Clause 3 states: “....no religious Test shall ever be required shall ever be required as a Qualification
to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

The House's attempts to embed 2020-style voter fraud in law via H.R. 1 clearly states that religious affiliation and
membership in religious organizations and groups must be divulged to participate with the redistricting agency.
This is unambiguously unconstitutional.

=================================

The unconstitutional H.R 1, a con job dubbed “For The People Act” must be stopped.

Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice
How to file a complaint: https://www.justice.gov/crt/how-file-complaint

US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121

12 posted on 03/15/2021 6:59:03 AM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion; SkyDancer; Sarah Barracuda

Ping.


13 posted on 03/15/2021 7:04:40 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

When there is a choice between a secular party and a Satan party, why do so-called “Christians” choose demoncraps?


14 posted on 03/15/2021 7:10:58 AM PDT by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

... a Constitution-friendly judiciary ...


Where ya gonna find one of those?


15 posted on 03/15/2021 7:18:37 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

WHAT Constitution???


16 posted on 03/15/2021 7:40:59 AM PDT by SMARTY ( "Force always attracts men of low morality. " Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Does HR 1 have a “separability clause”? If not, maybe the obviously unconstitutional inclusion of a religious test for office would be sufficient to throw the whole vile thing out.


17 posted on 03/15/2021 7:45:04 AM PDT by Campion (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

They want to keep Catholics out, along with others who are pro-life.


18 posted on 03/15/2021 7:57:13 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

bump


19 posted on 03/15/2021 7:59:42 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Communism covers a lot of ground with every act and the democrats understand it.


20 posted on 03/15/2021 8:41:53 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson