Posted on 03/11/2021 9:59:28 AM PST by gattaca
The House of Representatives on Thursday passed a bill expanding background checks on individuals who are seeking to purchase or transfer firearms as top Democrats have vowed to reintroduce gun control measures.
“This bill is a critical step toward preventing gun violence and saving lives,” Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) who sponsored the measure known as H.R. 8, as Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) introduced the companion bill in the upper chamber.
The bill, titled the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021, passed 227-203, receiving eight Republican votes and one Democrat vote against. Five Republicans co-sponsored the bill along with several Democrats.
According to a summary of the legislation, it will “utilize the current background checks process in the United States to ensure individuals prohibited from gun possession are not able to obtain firearms.” Currently, any firearm purchased at a retail store or online has to go through a background check and has to involve a licensed firearms dealer with a federal firearms license, known as an FFL. Specifically, H.R.8 would require background checks for private sales.
The House recently passed another control measure, H.R. 1446, which allows for the FBI to indefinitely delay background checks. Currently, there is a three-day default transfer window. That measure was introduced by Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.).
It comes as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Thursday said they would reintroduce other gun control measures. President Joe Biden’s administration also expressed support for such measures in recent days.
“No more hopes and prayers, thoughts and prayers—a vote is what we need,” said Schumer in a news conference as he vowed to bring H.R. 8 out of former Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell’s “legislative graveyard” after it stalled in the Senate in 2019.
Republicans have said these measures won’t make Americans safer, with one saying that H.R. 8 would create a possible “national registry of firearms.”
“The idea that this is going to make us safer is laughable,” said Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) on the House floor Thursday. “Criminals looking to get their hands on firearms to use in crimes are not going to submit to background checks. Only law-abiding citizens will follow the law. This is a back door means of setting up a national registry of firearms—something I completely oppose.”
Miller added that the United States has “enough gun laws,” but she said that “we need is to make sure the laws we have are enforced.”
“We need better enforcement—not more laws,” Miller added. “Instead of passing terrible legislation like H.R. 8, we need to do a better job of providing law enforcement agencies with the resources they need to enforce existing gun laws.”
The bills and proposed bills come as record numbers of firearms are continuing to be sold in the United States. According to recent figures from the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), gun sales in January surged by around 9.5 percent month-over-month and around 60 percent as compared with January 2019.
After H.R. 8 was passed by the House in 2019 as well, it was never taken up by the Republican-controlled Senate. Schumer said Thursday that the legislation will be discussed in the near future.
The National Rifle Association (NRA) in its 2019 analysis, said that the bill, if passed into law, would require that “loans, gifts, and sales of firearms be processed by a gun store. The same fees, paperwork, and permanent record-keeping apply as to buying a new gun from the store.”
“If you loan a gun to a friend without going to the gun store, the penalty is the same as for knowingly selling a gun to a convicted violent felon. Likewise, when the friend returns the gun, another trip to the gun store is necessary, upon pain of felony.”
Not like that matters.
bookmark
These people are total IDIOTS.................
I predict a sudden wave of tragic boating accidents.................
What part of "infringed" didn't they understand ?
Almighty then, no more gun violence.
[[“This bill is a critical step toward preventing gun violence and saving lives,”]]
Ny rammed through their unconstitutional “safe act” in the middle of the night, then tried to justify it by claiming that same thing, calling the bill an “imminent need” bill.
“Imminent needs” is double speak for “the made-up right to violate the constitution”
Again, there is no such thing as some euphemistic “gun control.” Guns are inanimate objects. There is only gun OWNER control.
How many times have you heard the phrase, on the local news, about a criminal’s arrest: “Was charged with ‘Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.’”?????.....................
States should pass their own laws to nullify. They can since it’s unconstitutional. Federal law supremacy doesn’t apply for an unconstitutional law.
“Unconstitutional.
Not like that matters.”
Yep. We’re watching a republic die.
Almighty = alrighty
For more commentary on this:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3941391/posts
Sent both our worthless senators message this morning on this (H.R.8) and on “For the People” (H.R.1) screw the voters bill.
Did you look in the:
Wokester’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the Ebonic Language
Law of the land determined solely by those who most ruthlessly us political power.
Well there was some serious flooding on Maui.
And Idaho, Wyoming and Montana...........................
I’m just waiting for the Supreme Court to declare the Constitution unconstitutional.
We had snow last night. Does that count?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.