Posted on 02/16/2021 5:59:00 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
... and now I know... yuck. (The internet is forever)
Kamala lacks Bill Clinton’s intelligence, charisma, and political acuteness, but other than that she is very Clintonesque.
Don does deviant things with his schemper, so anything he says is suspect.
Tell that to President Trump. They impeached him, again, simply for tweets and statements. But ‘rat’s are never held to the same standards. Or any standards really. Recently we’ve learned if you’re a ‘rat you can kill thousands in nursing homes and get off without even a slap on the wrist.
Same thing, genius. Bending over backward to put lipstick on the Biden administration pig
The 'press' would tar and feather that person then work toward destruction of his whole life...
That's what democrats did in the Jim Crow South - and it's what they do today. Different choice of victim - same evil tactics.
Profoundly stupid or profoundly dishonest? Or both? Honestly I don’t know. Maybe it’s both
She didn’t support AFBLM terrorists, she just tweeted support for...
Any truth to the rumor that FOX is in negotiations with ATT to purchase CNN?
I think I’ll tweet that someone ought to steal his car... then stand back and say it’s totally legal
State senator, prosecutor, and now VP advocating violent rioters get bailed out and promoting the fund to do so? Nothing wrong with that at all lol.
If one person contributed because of her, she becomes an accessory. And no one is saying if she contributed to the fund. Just says she didn’t bail someone out.
It works both ways.
-PJ
BINGO
What do you think would happen to an (R) who tweeted about funds to bail out capitol rioters?
At the very least, they would be twitter banned.
It would be far worse. They would be formally censored at the very least from congress, stripped of all committee assignments, and likely condemned by the GOP caucus and national GOP.
AND
They would be labeled a white nationalist domestic terrorist by the media and democrats (pretty much the same entity now).
Harris doesn’t use her own money to bail out terrorists, but only because she’s too greedy. She encourages others to use their money to bail out the numerous terrorists that she loves.
It looks to me like “aiding and abetting.”
The legal term aiding and abetting refers to a person’s action to help, support, or approve of someone else’s illegal act. Aiding and abetting is a crime in itself, held against those who would somehow assist a criminal - short of physically contributing to the illegal act.
Isn't that what Commie Law Harass Us did by setting up a helpline to get the criminals out on bail ?
So what I gather from your statement is that even though she is supposed to a descendant of India... she is considered Black by American standards, whatever that can mean;)
When you’re a Democrat, you can pick what you want — sex, race, etc. It’s what made Obama black when he needed to be...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.