Posted on 02/10/2021 8:40:07 AM PST by bitt
100 Percent Fed Up reports – Throughout the election, Donald Trump was battered by CCP Virus statistics in order to hurt the American economy and his political campaign. We know that it was shamelessly wielded as a political weapon to prevent President Trump and his supporters from rallying as Antifa and Black Lives Matter burned progressive poor and minority neighborhoods to the ground throughout the entire year. Now that Biden has been installed into the office of president, he promises to increase Covid lockdown measures and extend them further into your ability to travel and force unscientific mask-wearing for at least 100 days.
But, a new peer reviewed study has been released that finds the CDC numbers to be so wildly unsupported as to be pure propaganda that is based on wholly unscientific practices that were needlessly created on-the-spot.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
It’s OK. It was for a good cause (getting rid of Trump). /sarc
Firings?
Prosecutions?
Politically protected?
Number 3
There must be bodies, or money, everywhere.
So, now they will goo totally opposite so they can hail the miracles of St. Joke THE great physician..............
Here is the link.
Looks like a good article, but it’s not a scientific article.
Oops
https://jdfor2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/adf864_165a103206974fdbb14ada6bf8af1541.pdf
That’s the link.
All part of the coup.
State and local governments must act? What a crock. Even if some state or local government had the spine to do anything at all, just how could they stand up to massive federal corruption at the CDC?
But what reports such as this are doing is adding further verification to the election fraud and corruption that is dividing America.
How can state and local governments act when they were in on it? Its the hospitals and doctors that labeled cancer, heart attack, flu and even suicides as COVID, and need to have the hell sued out of them!
They won’t act on any of this. We have no one to act for us. They are all in on it.
Tell me where it was peer reviewed? They claim the paper is published in "Science, Public Health Policy & the Law". Google it, it is some rando sketch website.
ifinnegan wrote: “Looks like a good article, but it’s not a scientific article.”
Perhaps. But I would want to know the details of the ‘peer’ review before I put a lot of faith in that article. The IPAK is well known for publishing anti-vaccine articles with little of no substantiation.
What is DJT waiting for? He is making many people suffer just to prove a point. Maybe it will be worth it in the long run. All we can do is wait.
“A lie can travel around the world and back again while the truth is lacing up its boots.”—Mark Twain.
The only “action” state and local governments will take is getting on their kneepads and begging for more federal money.
Yeah.
Just look at it.
It seems to review things well.
The article has to speak for itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.