Posted on 02/04/2021 2:20:43 PM PST by Mariner
The U.S. Navy has patents on weird and little understood technology. According to patents filed by the Navy, it is working on a compact fusion reactor that could power cities, an engine that works using “inertial mass reduction,” and a “hybrid aerospace-underwater craft.” Dubbed the “UFO patents, The War Zone has reported that the Navy had to build prototypes of some of the outlandish tech to prove it worked.
Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais is the man behind the patents and The War Zone has proven the man exists, at least on paper. Pais has worked for a number of different departments in the Navy, including the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAVAIR/NAWCAD) and the Strategic Systems Programs. (SSP) The SSP mission, according to its website, is to “provide credible and affordable strategic solutions to the warfighter.” It’s responsible for developing the technology behind the Trident class nuclear missiles launched from Submarines.
(Excerpt) Read more at vice.com ...
The fabric of reality changed in 2020.
In that case, why would the Navy even bother to file for a patent? Talk about national security concerns!!!
True.
And they are even harder to get to go than DT by huge bunches, unless you believe in the low-energy a-neutronic fusion scam - aka cold fusion in which case you are on an LSD overdose.
If he puts it in a patent anyone on earth can read it. It sounds like he claims to have created and contained a miniature sun. The University of Utah claimed the same about twenty years ago. It could be possible maybe not. At work I have attempted to recreate patent claims on expired patents to make new products. At least one third to half of the claims could not be reproduced.
Thanks for the interesting comments.
I hadn’t expected such a high rate of failure.
perfect...
IIRC, Joann Fabrics sells the fabric of reality for $15.99 a yard.
Cool Movie. Just imagine how badly We could have kicked Japanese butt with just 1 Carrier.
Several companies have a-neutronic reactor designs under research and not a "cold fusion" design amongst'em.
And NASA's Glenn Research Center and the Navy's SPAWAR laboratory both think "cold fusion" (aka LENR) is real and have presented peer-reviewed papers saying so.
Aneutronic fusion is a polite term for the continuation of the Cold Fusion fraud. It’s utter ribbish.
No, it isn't. Aneutronic fusion is any fusion reaction that doesn't give off neutrons. There are MANY different a-neutronic systems involving the light elements:
Deuterium - Helium-3: 2D+He3→He4+1p+ 18.3 MeV
Deuterium - Lithium-6: 2D+Li6→2He4+ 22.4 MeV
Proton - Lithium-6: 1p+Li6→He4+He3+ 4.0 MeV
Helium-3 – Lithium-6: He3+Li6→2He4+p+ 16.9 MeV
Helium-3 - Helium-3: He3+He3→He4+2p+ 12.86 MeV
Proton – Lithium-7: p+Li7→2He4 + 17.2 MeV
Proton – Boron-11: p+B11→3He4 + 8.7 MeV
Proton – Nitrogen: p+N15→C12+He4 + 5.0 MeV
One potential reason for a lunar colony is to mine He3 from lunar dust (the sun emits copious He3).
I hope you have purchased shares in these ventures. Your experience may vary.
That ship sailed long ago. The cold fusion crowd took ownership.
The problem with all of these reactions is that their reaction thresholds [the temperature you need to get a plasma to to ignite] is much higher than it is for DT.
“I think the Chinese are way ahead of the rest of the world in that respect until if it pans out.”
How about their quantum (instantaneous) communication work, too?
Actually, considering the motion of the earth rotating and orbiting the sun, the sun orbiting the galactic core, and the galaxy moving thru the universe...the Nimitz would have most likely arrived in empty space.
Earth is moving thru space at 390 km/sec (242 mi/sec). Earth’s diameter is 7,917 miles. A 32 second time jump moves you one Earth diameter from where (in space) you left.
No, it hasn't. I follow the "cold fusion crowd", and that terminology is NEVER used. Latest science from the Glenn labs using bubble detectors shows that LENR (the CORRECT internal use term for "cold fusion") does indeed give off at least some neutrons.
"The problem with all of these reactions is that their reaction thresholds [the temperature you need to get a plasma to to ignite] is much higher than it is for DT."
And yet, serious research is ongoing to do precisely that.
not if you love silly ass movies
Laughable."
Question is, has China already ripped this tech off? If not, they'll have it before the end of the year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.