Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the impeachment trial opens the door for Trump to present ALL voter fraud evidence in court
NOQ Report ^ | 01/29/2021 | JD Rucker

Posted on 01/29/2021 7:46:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind

With the fraudulent 2020 election having been made official eight days ago, the vast majority of Trump-supporters believe there is no recourse. This is not true. The President and his team have a few different options. They’re all longshots as far as returning him to his rightful place in the Oval Office, but they can be used to get the evidence out to the people, evidence of voter fraud that has been suppressed.

If the Senate impeachment trial moves forward, these actions would also give him the opportunity to defend himself in ways the Senate itself will not present. We’ve discussed in-depth how a writ of quo warranto may be his best course of action. We will continue to explore this option until it’s no longer on the table or until it’s actually initiated. But there’s another course of action, a declaratory judgment action, that the President and his team can perform.

In an article meant to position a declaratory judgment action as superior to a writ of quo warranto, Mario Apuzzo, Esq. at ThePostEmail explained why he believes the former is the way to go. After reviewing the article and others, I’m convinced that there’s nothing prohibiting the President from pursuing both courses of action. He should. At this point, we need every legal option in play. They are not mutually exclusive, so why not pursue both?



(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evidence; impeachment; trial; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: SeekAndFind

In which court?


21 posted on 01/29/2021 8:06:34 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Objection Your Honor, Defendant is promulgating misleading information concerning elections.

SUSTAINED. The Defendant will restrict his comments to the inciting violence topic...


22 posted on 01/29/2021 8:06:41 AM PST by epluribus_2 (He, had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The Senate will vote not to allow testimony.

That means that the Q Shaman can't testify? Bummer.

23 posted on 01/29/2021 8:07:45 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In an article meant to position a declaratory judgment action as superior to a writ of quo warranto, Mario Apuzzo, Esq. at ThePostEmail explained why he believes the former is the way to go.

Apuzzo claims Trump can't file for a writ quo warranto because POTUS isn't an office of the United States. That doesn't sound right, but it's been a strange election.
24 posted on 01/29/2021 8:08:03 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
This is essentially a Senate Hearing

A Senate hearing controlled entirely by the Democrats. If they ever need a single Republican vote to help drive the train down this railroad they know that they can count on Romney and the other Republican useful idiots who voted against dismissal.

25 posted on 01/29/2021 8:08:43 AM PST by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Electors elect the president...we don’t!


26 posted on 01/29/2021 8:11:34 AM PST by Don Corleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wont happen.

Since the trail will be presideded over by a Senate Democrat, and since the trial will be only on the charge of insurrection or insightment to riot, the evidence will not be permitted.


27 posted on 01/29/2021 8:11:35 AM PST by taxcontrol (You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

BEEN PRAYING THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN
REVIEW THOSE GEORGIA SENATE ELECTION RESULTS

There were a series of fraudulent voting charges here. Were they enforced and corrected before this election took place ? If they weren’t is not a review called for ?
If the Georgia Secretary of State is in charge of voting he has the responsibility of enforcing the state’s regulations as to who votes. And eliminate those from voter lists who don’t qualify.

Assign prosecutors to personally canvass and investigate. Check if military actually voted by asking them. Identify all voters by checking on legal age their residency and citizenship. If found they do not qualify charge Illegals including state visitors known as snowbirds also include any technical computer fraudulent Italian programming testimony when presenting to the court and get these election results tossed. Try and get it done SAP before the 20th

LINKED HERE ARE REASONS WHY THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3927647/posts#28

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3924076/posts#30
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923435/posts#21
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923157/posts#10
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3922715/posts#18
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3923312/posts#11


28 posted on 01/29/2021 8:12:38 AM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

BEEN PRAYING THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN
REVIEW THOSE GEORGIA SENATE ELECTION RESULTS

There were a series of fraudulent voting charges here. Were they enforced and corrected before this election took place ? If they weren’t is not a review called for ?
If the Georgia Secretary of State is in charge of voting he has the responsibility of enforcing the state’s regulations as to who votes. And eliminate those from voter lists who don’t qualify.

Assign prosecutors to personally canvass and investigate. Check if military actually voted by asking them. Identify all voters by checking on legal age their residency and citizenship. If found they do not qualify charge Illegals including state visitors known as snowbirds also include any technical computer fraudulent Italian programming testimony when presenting to the court and get these election results tossed. Try and get it done SAP before the 20th

LINKED HERE ARE REASONS WHY THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3927647/posts#28

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3924076/posts#30
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923435/posts#21
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3923157/posts#10
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3922715/posts#18
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3923312/posts#11


29 posted on 01/29/2021 8:15:23 AM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Though the evidence is easily at hand, is comprehensive and specific to crimes committed by the Democrat leadership, the fund of evidence has been suppressed. The rule of law is over in the United States. Sure, laws will be quoted, and many will be prosecuted, but the establishment leadership will not actually obey the law as written. No law, no justice.

The Democrats know they are guilty, and know they would lose in court. But they also know that they can block the evidence, and force through whatever they please, as the rule of law is over in the United States. As things get ever more heated and turbulent, this will become ever more apparent to everyone.


30 posted on 01/29/2021 8:23:11 AM PST by Richard Axtell (President Asterisk is an ass to risk the economy and rights of all Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Do you remember all of the witnesses and other evidence that President Trump was permitted to introduce in his own defense during the 2 minute impeachment hearing in the House? Me neither.

The only difference between the impeachment “hearing” in the House and the “trial” in the Senate is that in the Senate all of the Democrat Senators will be given time to deliver speeches to their Democrat supporters back home about the terrible, evil, rotten, horrible, no good, Orange Man Bad.


31 posted on 01/29/2021 8:23:14 AM PST by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Think of the endless hours we here on FR have spent reading the details of the voter fraud - and without the objections of the other side. A thorough airing would take forever, and the Dems would take just as long. It is just too complicated, too easily manipulated by MSM. It would end up a fool’s errand.


32 posted on 01/29/2021 8:27:29 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, yeah, the commies will not allow that. This is going to be a Soviet style show trial - nothing else.


33 posted on 01/29/2021 8:33:27 AM PST by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

With Leahy there to block the open doorway.


34 posted on 01/29/2021 8:39:39 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I feel certain that is exactly what Trump plans to do. Its all part of waking up the public to the truth so they will be accepting of the solution that is coming.


35 posted on 01/29/2021 8:45:36 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The leftist presiding “judge” will never allow this. It ain’t going to happen...


36 posted on 01/29/2021 8:46:45 AM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The information on quo warranto comes from D.C. Law Library-Capter 35, Quo Warranto. Giuliani’s team never had their evidence entered in any court. All cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. The team claims to have sufficient evidence, but in my view this is over.

In terms of insurrection it is similar to inciting a riot. Those who stormed the capitol are being tried with other crimes, probably because insurrection charges wouldn’t stick. And inciting insurrection charges on Trump won’t stick either because he clearly called for people to peacefully and lawfully let their voices be heard. The whole impeachment is kabuki theater.


37 posted on 01/29/2021 8:47:22 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

RE: The leftist presiding “judge” will never allow this.

How is he doing? He was taken ill two days ago and had to be hospitalized.


38 posted on 01/29/2021 8:49:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The other night one of the evening FNC hosts showed the Chicago Teachers Union's interpretative dance (in favor of keeping the schools closed).

Maybe Leahy will have them do an interpretative dance version of Trump's January 6th speech instead of allowing the actual speech to be introduced as evidence.

39 posted on 01/29/2021 8:53:03 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
The democrats will not allow any evidence to be introduced that the democrats do not want introduced.

I am sad to say that you are 100% correct.

This will be a sham.

The demonRATs are corrupt, not stupid, and they will not allow a single shred of evidence that does not help their position.

Since "leaky leahy" is the 'Presiding Judge' the only thing that people will hear is the banging of the gavel, and his "Out of order" screams.

40 posted on 01/29/2021 9:50:17 AM PST by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson